Clowns are Scary

"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell, they are" TRKOF

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer in 2013: "We much prefer the risk of up or down votes and majority rule [on judicial nominees], than the risk of continued total obstruction. That's the bottom line no matter who's in power." Schumer now: "The irresistible, immutable logic is, if the nominee doesn't get 60 [votes], you change the nominee, not the rules." Senator Tim Kaine in October 2016: "If [Republicans] think they're going to stonewall the filling of [the SCOTUS] vacancy or other vacancies, then a Democratic Senate majority will say, 'We're not going to let you thwart the law.' And so we will change the Senate rules to uphold the law." Kaine now: "The way I look at it is the Supreme Court is the only position that requires you to get to a 60-vote threshold, which means it mandates that there be some bipartisanship and that is appropriate. Life tenure. Highest court in the land. Should have to get to 60 votes." And, "I will oppose his nomination." Senator Elizabeth Warren in November 2013: "If Republicans continue to filibuster these highly qualified nominees for no reason than to nullify the president's constitutional authority, then senators not only have the right to change the filibuster, senators have a duty to change the filibuster rules." And she also said, "We need to call out these filibusters for what they are — naked attempts to nullify the results of the last presidential election." Warren now: "I believe Judge Gorsuch's nomination should be blocked." Not that reporting any of this matters; the USofA having jumped the shark.

It's a fact ...

T-2 CUZZIN RICKY "[B]owing to pressure from the Hillary Clinton campaign and the liberal media by 'fact-checking' Republican nominee Donald Trump..." By the way, this whole fact-checking business? It's not what it is.  You know what fact-checking is?  Fact-checking is nothing more than an opportunity for the Drive-Bys to opinionate in the news by calling it fact-checking.  There's are not fact checks. These are bogus, opinion-oriented assertions. But of course the low-information voters that read this stuff and even some, well, relatively intelligent people think that what we're getting here is legitimate fact-checking. Now, here's a piece from Kelly Riddell.  I didn't print where this comes from.  This might be McClatchy. It's not McClatchy.  It might be Breitbart.  I don't think it's Breitbart. I'm sorry, I didn't print out the website. (interruption) They say it's a popular one. I know that. I just don't remember what it is.  But there are "Eight Examples Where 'Fact-Checking' Became Opinion Journalism." This is the whole point.  In fact, James Taranto -- who is a great blogger, The Best of the Web blog, part of the Wall Street Journal empire. James Taranto actually tweeted that fact-checking "is opinion journalism pretending to be some sort of heightened objectivity." That's even better because that's exactly right.  The Drive-Bys do their fact-checking under the guise that they have no bias whatsoever, that they're totally objective and they're looking at these claims and they're being the final arbiter with no bias whatsoever, and it's patent BS.  And so what Kelly Riddell has done here is give eight examples of supposed fact-checking which are really nothing more than attempts at opinion journalism.  The first one is from the New York Times [...] Amen I say unto you ... keep the faith.

... and liar too!

Tom Mann thinks the photograper was fired ....

When Her Filthiness speaks ...

“ Hillary Clinton: I Support Obama’s Decision To Take Executive Action On Immigration WASHINGTON (CBSDC/AP) — Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave her stamp of approval on the executive actions President Barack Obama will take on immigration. “I support the President’s decision to begin fixing our broken immigration system and focus finite resources on deporting felons rather than families,” Clinton said in a statement following Obama’s Thursday night address. In the statement, Clinton blamed Republicans’ “abdication of responsibility” for forcing Obama to take executive action. “Their abdication of responsibility paved the way for this executive action, which follows established precedent from Presidents of both parties going back many decades,” Clinton said. “But, only Congress can finish the job by passing permanent bipartisan reform that keeps families together, treats everyone with dignity and compassion, upholds the rule of law, protects our borders and national security, and brings millions of hard-working people out of the shadows and into the formal economy so they can pay taxes and contribute to our nation’s prosperity.” Mind boggling  layers of calumny, chutzpah, misdirection, and self-serving poppycock here. Bravo. ”

GRUBBY GRUBER in 2 Munutes

OBAMUNISM, The Party, All of #GruberGate, Explained in 2 minutes  Leon H. Wolf Over the past few weeks I've thought about doing this several times.  Once I'da had the video made in 20 minutes, but now it takes me 2-3 days to read my mail. That was good, but maybe better is this below.    Because it takes just 1 minute to portray Obama and the Democrats all at once. Lie like hell, cause once it's law, screw-em.

So Satan and a - WHO?

It's KARMA, Lantos

“ "One is the old corrupt party of thieves and crooks. Its politicians, black and white, are the products of political machines. They believe in absolutely nothing. They can go from being Dixiecrats to crying racism, from running on family values to pushing gay marriage and the War on Women. They will say absolutely anything to get elected."—the Sultan Knish; The late California Democrat Tom Lantos falls into the first category of Democrats, as defined by Sultan Knish.   His LANTOS FOUNDATION survives, and funds MEMRI (Middle East Media Research Institute).   I  stumbled on  the site and found Satan and a Jewish Woman Give Birth to ISIS satire (which is bizarre).  I'm struck by how these Iraqis substitute a Jewish woman (huh?) for the obvious Satan-Radical Muslim connection.   That emulates Lantos's Democrat Party tactic of shifting blame to political enemies (Obama: Conservatives Are Greatest Threat To Nation) for their failures.  Let's just say evil begets evil, Tom. RIP. ”

Tom Harkin Builds Legacy

“

HARK!  A CHARGE REPROACHES! leftist liar and phony war hero Tom Harkin takes the money and runs LOL Dems fume as Harkin takes the money and doesn't run Retiring Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, has angered his fellow Democrats by keeping the nearly $2.4 million in his personal campaign account rather than donating it to the campaign of Bruce Braley, the party's nominee to succeed him. Harkin, who is retiring after five terms in office, plans to instead donate most of the funds to Drake University to help create a political institute in his own name.... [Examiner]

”

Alison Lundergan Grimes is lying

“

"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell." U.S. Senate candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes is lying about her support for the state’s coal industry according to Kentucky Democrats, including members of her campaign team, who were captured on a hidden camera video.

”

Agents provocateurs

I should make a sign that says Democrats for Romney. Just as truthful. Reminds me of when GHWBush was speaking at a college as an ambassador to the UN that Noam Chomsky suggested that instead of protesting his presence that they should instead dress up as KKK and have signs that say they support Bush and sit in the audience. It was effective. thoR~!

When Jay Carney Speaks

Today's Metaphor

Jay Carney

Mary Landrieu of Louisiana-Liar

“

Mary Landrieu is one Democratic senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana is in a tough reelection battle because of her support for Obamacare. So its not surprising her latest TV ad focuses on the one high-profile fight she's had with the Obama administration, over oil and gas exploration. The 60-second spot features people watching Landrieu arguing for expanding energy exploration in Louisiana and criticizing Barack Obama for its restrictionist policies. Watch the video below: Most of the clips the ad features are from her appearances on local and cable TV news. But watch the clips of Landrieu around the video's halfway point. They feature the senator speaking in what looks like a congressional hearing, excoriating a faceless witness. "They have to sit here and listen to the federal government say, 'We can't share a penny with you'? I will not rest until this injustice is fixed," Landrieu says. "Do you think there are a bunch of fairy godmothers out there who just wave a magic wand?" The clips feature a chyron at the bottom of the screen for a program called "Eye on Washington." Below that is the headline, "Obama administration says it won't support increased oil and gas revenue sharing." The problem is that the video clip doesn't come from C-SPAN or any other real TV show. In fact, the clip is a reenactment of a real committee hearing from last year, viewable here. The relevant lines that Landrieu recreated for the campaign ad begin at about 2 hours and 30 minutes into the video. Weekly Standard

”

The Left Unhinged

“ Does anyone else smell panic gas? And there's this .... During a contentious congressional hearing on Tuesday, Attorney General Eric Holder disdainfully told Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) “good luck with your asparagus.” “When somebody started attacking his integrity, he stood up and said, ‘I object, he’s casting aspersions on my asparagus!’ Many, including TheBlaze, assumed Holder was mocking Gohmert for seemingly fumbling his words back in 2013 when he said, “The attorney general will not cast aspersions on my asparagus!” Gohmert was ridiculed at the time by Comedy Central’s “The Colbert Report,” the Washington Post, the U.K. Guardian and more for the “famously embarrassing” moment. But Gohmert told Glenn Beck on Wednesday that he did not fumble his words back in 2013, and was in fact using a quote that goes back decades. “Percy Foreman was a very, very liberal criminal defense attorney, but he was incredible in the courtroom,” Gohmert said on Beck’s radio show. “When somebody started attacking his integrity, he stood up and said, ‘I object, he’s casting aspersions on my asparagus!’ And people would scratch their heads, but it brought down the level of the rancor. I was using a Percy Foreman line from criminal trials back probably 50 years ago.” Other research confirms that the line was used in decades past. A 1973 book by John Dos Passos includes a letter where an individual says, “don’t think that I’m ‘casting asparagus’…” And in “The Three Stooges,” a chef even parodies the line by demanding, “Are you casting asparagus on my cooking?” FULL - ".... buddy!' U.S. Circuit Judge William Pryor Jr., a member of the U.S. Sentencing Commission, expressed his unease with Holder directive to federal prosecutors on reducing prosecutions and sentencing for drug crimes, thus bypassing the regular commission process. “The law provides the executive no authority to establish national sentencing policies based on speculation about how we and Congress might vote on a proposed amendment,” Pryor said. aSIDE PALIN WARNS HOLDER ON GUN BRACELETS: 'YOU DON'T WANT TO GO THERE, BUDDY' ”

Harry Reid, you know. Liar.

Harry Reid March 23, 2014  Harry Reid February 26, 2014 "Mr. President, the junior senator from Wyoming has come to the floor several times recently talking about the fact that examples that he and other Republicans have given dealing with ObamaCare, examples that are bad, I've called lies. Mr. President, that is simply untrue. "I have never come to the floor, to my recollection, I've never said a word about examples that Republicans have given regarding ObamaCare and how it's not very good." "We heard about the evils of Obamacare, about the lives it's ruining in Republicans' stump speeches and in ads paid for by oil magnates, the Koch brothers. But in those tales, turned out to be just that: tales, stories made up from whole cloth, lies distorted by the Republicans to grab headlines or make political advertisements. "There's plenty of horror stories being told. All of them are untrue, but they're being told all over America."   Harry Reid is 74 years old.  It's fair to say that anyone over the age of, say 16, who habitually lies is a liar.  So there's that.  Why then would anybody believe a word Harry (or any elected Democrat, and some Republicans) say about anything that would effect their life?   Why in an age where the past can be summoned with a wave of the Google wand think they can get away with lying?  The answer of course is the Progressive's  arrogance allows them to invoke Churchill's "Bodyguard of Lies " in any case where the truth is disadvantageous. So it's not lying; it's protecting their country—from us.

A Call for Help

“ HELP! Ppl post this shit on FBook. I don't know how to refute it. Merrily We Go Along Yes you do Merrily Statistics are used much like a drunk uses a lamppost: for support, not illumination. (Vin Scully)   First,  it's an irrefutable truth that all elected democrats are liars.  These  message factoids are targeted at the dismally Lo-Fo consumer.  Additionally, there is irrefutable truth that the very genetic structure that create Liberal receptors, tangentally  make it impossible to understand national defense, economics, or right from wrong.  I personally think it's caused by Monsanto.  Obama continues to set new records for mendacity.  First, and most importantly, he and his congressional lickspittles front-load all legislation so that true costs will not kick in until he's out of office.  In the case of Obamacare, for example, after miscalculating the true disastrous consequences of that legislation, he's used his magical pen to extralegally change the dates when piper is to be paid. Anyway, don't worry about it; we'll have to kill all of them (in the good way) at some point anyway. They are a cancer.

Sen. Feinscam

“ The Two Faces of Elected Democrats  ... it's probably not a good idea to begin by asserting that virtually all elected Democrats are liars. But what the hell. Mr. Ron Metzger Which brings to mind— I naively thought Congress wanted to get rid of the bad apples. Boy, was I wrong. I thought we were doing a good thing here, but it turned out Congress didn't agree with that. They were angry Francis 'Bud' Mullen former FBI assistant director .While prosecutors won 19 Abscam convictions, Congress sought assurances that a similar investigation would never happen again. Then-U.S. Attorney General Benjamin Civiletti approved new guidelines in 1981 that governed "sensitive" undercover investigations involving politicians.  [Full] Of the thirty-one targeted officials, one US senator (Harrison A. Williams (D-NJ)) and six members of the US House of Representatives (John Jenrette (D-SC), Richard Kelly (R-FL), Raymond Lederer (D-PA), Michael "Ozzie" Myers (D-PA), Frank Thompson (D-NJ), and John M. Murphy (D-NY)) were convicted of bribery and conspiracy in separate trials in 1981. John Murtha (D-PA) was one of the Congressmen videotaped[16] in an encounter with undercover FBI operatives.[17] Although never indicted or prosecuted, he was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the scandal.[18] .... Murtha was given immunity and testified against his colleagues, and remained in Congress Until fairly recently, most discussions of Abscam misdirected his party affiliation with (Harrison A. Williams (R-NJ)   ”

Baghdad Debbie

D Wasserman Schultz ‏@DWStweets  Mar 11 The GOP underperformed tonight in the #FL13 - a district they've held for decades. Here's why: http://demrapidresponse.com/post/79311928359/dnc-chair-debbie-wasserman-schultzs-statement-on … “ Republican David Jolly was victorious over Democrat Alex Sink 48.5 percent to 46.7 percent, with Libertarian Lucas Overby collecting 4.8 percent of the vote. It was the first major test of the Obamacare effect on an election, with both sides spending millions of dollars rehearsing national campaign strategies. Wasserman Schultz, whose Twitter handle is @DWStweets, sent out a brief tweet, stating: “The GOP underperformed tonight in the #FL13 – a district they’ve held for decades.” It provided a link to a longer comment, in which she noted: “Republican special interest groups poured in millions to hold onto a Republican congressional district that they’ve comfortably held for nearly 60 years. Tonight, Republicans fell short of their normal margin in this district because the agenda they are offering voters has a singular focus – that a majority of voters oppose – repealing the Affordable Care Act that would return us to the same old broken health care system. Ahem-FAIL ... the evenly divided district (a district Barack Obama carried in both 2008 and 2012) had been considered a toss-up. “ Clinton recorded a phone call last week seeking local volunteers to help with Sink's campaign, and a half dozen House Democrats emailed fundraising appeals to their own supporters on her behalf. “  Sink outspent Jolly by more than 3 to 1 on television advertising, though outside groups aligned with the GOP helped narrow the overall Democratic advantage. -myway.com/ UPDATE  Listen to Mark Levin's Account of this race ( Mile 66 n commente) ”

Dueling Ass Clowns

saw this in three 4 different places today; Metzger

The Duck That Got Way

When Democrats are in charge                                                Duck Dynasty: The Show That Got Away “ [...] This is what happened.  The whole idea of the show was to parade these nouveau riche Christian hillbillies around so that we could laugh at them. "Look at them," we were supposed to say.  "Look how backward they are!  Look what they believe!  Can you believe they really live this way and believe this stuff?  See how they don't fit in? HAHAHA" When the producers saw the way the show was shaping up, different than they envisioned it, they tried to change course.  They tried to get the Robertson's to tone down their Christianity, but to their eternal credit they refused.  They tried to add fake cussin' to the show by inserting bleeps where no cussword was uttered.  At best, they wanted to make the Robertson's look like crass buffoons. At worst they wanted them to look like hypocrites. They desperately wanted us to laugh at the Robertsons.  Instead, we loved them. [Full] Tangentially related .. this reminds me of the Clarence Thomas affair.  Aftermath polls showed that 66%—across the board; Blacks, Whites, Women, Men, Democrat and Republican—66% thought Clarence Thomas was being truthful and Anita Hill the liar.  Hollywood kicked in with references on TV sitcoms and stand up comedy about what a liar Thomas was, and before you know it, the polls reversed themselves.  Which of course demonstrates just how dedicated to the Liberal cause our media are.  And why we have this government.  Sir H ”

Two B-Bags; Kuster and Clinton

“ Just Because ... WATCH Ann Kuster is a - wait; are there any elected Democrat women who do not appear to be stupid, clueless, script reading chatterboxes?  Maybe Di-Fi (she does manage to project a false air of competence.  I can't think of another).  I don't care that they are for the most part quite unattractive, I do mind that they are dull witted. PS - Kuster could not have been elected dog catcher before the NH was over-run by Massachussettscum trying to escape the mess they made. WATCH Rand Paul strip her smirking ass naked Hillary Clinton is a gangster, pure and simple.  She's a liar, a crook. a traitor to her country, a murderess, and without a single landmark accomplishment to her name during way too many years in public life.  Her testimony here is enough to send her to prison. ”

Last name's Emanuel. From Chicago.

LIARS and Other Democrats                   "If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected or active Democrats are liars, but what the hell." -  TRKOF&S “ One Example (out of 65,276→) "The president never said you were going to have unlimited choice of any doctor in the country you want to go to," said the Obamacare architect. "No. He asked a question. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Did he not say that, sir?" "He didn't say you could have unlimited choice." "It's a simple yes or no question. Did he say if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor?" "Yes. But look, if you want to pay more for an insurance company that covers your doctor, you can do that. This is a matter of choice. We know in all sorts of places you pay more for certain -- for a wider range of choices or wider range of benefits.The issue isn't the selective networks. People keep saying, Oh, the problem is you're going to have a selective network--" "Well, if you lose your doctor or lose your hospital-- [etc]" Answer. He's a Liberal Democrat He's Rahm Emanuel's Brother He fashioned the Obamacare legislation People want to find him alone in an alley ”