Showing posts with label Lynch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lynch. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

The Tarmac



DEEP STATE                

                     





A Quiet Meeting ...
The tarmac meeting being only small talk does make sense if it was the end point, not the starting point.

Lynch Meat

SCROLL
We now know a lot more about the sequence of events, which now strongly suggests that the tarmac meeting was not the start of events that led to the exoneration. Rather, it now appears that the tarmac meeting was the end of that process, the signal to the Clintons that all was taken care of.
The key facts we know now but did not know then are:
  1. The tarmac meeting was planned, not spontaneous, as we covered on August 5, 2017, ACLJ: DOJ Document Dump Shows Lynch-Clinton Tarmac Summit Planned, Media Coverup.
  2. The conduct of Lynch in trying to conceal details was not consistent with it being an innocent meeting, as we covered on August 7, 2017, Loretta Lynch used alias “Elizabeth Carlisle” to email about Bill Clinton tarmac meeting and August 10, 2017, Why did Loretta Lynch need DOJ Talking Points about a meeting she alone attended?
  3. The FBI has tried its best not to produce documents regarding the tarmac meeting, and when it did, those documents focused heavily on how the meeting was discovered, as Judicial Watch reported on November 30, 2017.
  4. The FBI decided, sometime by early May 2016, not to charge Hillary. The drafts of the exoneration statement now are public, and show a concerted effort to reword the language to support exoneration. These drafts took place prior to the tarmac meeting and prior to the interview of Hillary on July 4th weekend.
  5. Senior FBI agent Peter Strzok, who was part of the team investigating Hillary, was removed from the Mueller investigation of supposed Russia collusion in the summer  of 2016 for sending anti-Trump text messages (though the removal was not disclosed for several months). Strzok was involved in editing and softening the Comey draft exoneration statement.
  6. Strzok was having an affair with FBI lawyer Lisa Page, Based on text messages recently released, it appears they believed Hillary would not be charged and suggested Lynch Knew the Outcome of FBI Hillary Probe in Advance.
So what significance does the tarmac meeting take in this new context?
So the tarmac meeting very likely signaled to Hillary through Bill that all was good, that there was nothing to worry about regarding her upcoming FBI interview.

How would that signal take place? It could have been stated verbally, but more likely was the proverbial nod and wink. If anyone understands body language, it’s Bill Clinton. He didn’t need to be told in words, though we can’t rule that out.
[FULL]

Sarah Carter, for one, asks this burning question:

 Why Are Strzok and Page Still With The FBI?

Monday, October 23, 2017

A Fine Lynching



OBAMUNISM, The Party
,





Will you choose the rope, or lethal injection Miss Jynch?

Buckwheat LorretaLynch
O-TAY!


Why did you threaten the FBI informant on the uranium deal with jail if he told Congress and the public what he knew?

Should Eric Holder, Hillary and the Obama administration have approved the uranium deal to Russia knowing that they were under Federal investigation for corruption and kickbacks?  Mueller was involved in the investigation, so do you think he should be investigating the supposed Russian collusion today?

Buckwheat LorretaLynch
Is there any way that Bill Clinton should have been allowed to accept $500,000 from Russia for a speech and meet with Putin while Hillary was Secretary of State? Doesn't over $100 Million in donations to the Clinton Foundation after the uranium deal was completed have all the appearances of kickbacks? What else could they be?

If the Obama Administration, CIA, FBI and others were actually worried about Russian collusion in the election, wouldn't they have also spied on Hillary and her team because of their many Russian connections?

Why did Obama change the rules right at the end of his term to make it easier to unmask people? Weren't there any inadvertent conversations between Democrats and Russian officials picked up if the targets of the recordings actually Russian officials and not Trump people?

Isn't it a great threat to democracy when a President and his supposedly independent justice department clearly targets their political opponents, before and after the election?

Was there ever any actual evidence of collusion on the election?


Oh, There's more,  much MORE,  from Jack Hellner.
Buckwheat LorretaLynch
Somewhere; sometime (and I think we're getting close);  the cork will be pulled from out of this barrel of Obama SH*T.




Monday, July 24, 2017

Where is the indictment ?


I've watched this Lorettea Lynch seg 4-5 times.  I suggest that every WaPost and NYT attack on Trump be responded to, in comments,  with just this link. https://youtu.be/u85UfrKMhkY

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Zippety Doo-Dah

Tuesday, June 13, 2017

DEEEEEEEEP State


8

Christopher Sign said the FBI told local reporters they could not take in photos or video of the meeting:

Hillary Clinton told “Meet the Press” later that week that the controversial meeting between her husband and Attorney General Loretta Lynch was “purely social.” Hillary insisted they talked about their grandkids and golf during their meeting on the tarmac.

Now this…
The NSA now says it will not release details of the meeting between Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch due to the “national security” risk.
Via Freedom Outpost:

Monday, October 31, 2016

Loretta's Fraud

Loretta's Mustache                           





I've previously opined that Obama's engineered election in 2008 means government has already been overthrown.  So, was I wrong? What's happening now seals the deal, IMO.   Clinonistas will/are claiming Comey's action may cost her the election.  That's crap.

Harry  Reid says FBI chief may have violated law by disclosing review .  

Nice try Harry, but no cigar. The public perception of the FBI's mandate was born by years of  J. Edgar's fight against the  "communist menace."  These scandals show just how serious are the Left's attempts to undermine our democracy; so same difference. Too late to spin.

One other note.  Like most of you I visit Drudge at least once a day, and it seems to me that every day, for the last 3-4 months, I've seen this.  "HILLARY LEAD DOWN TO +1"

Pul-eeeze.

One other note.  The House should  convene immediately and start impeachment proceedings against Loretta Lynch.

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

When you wish upon a star ....

Res Ipsa Loquitur 




Ron Metzger

5:14 PM (14 hours ago)

When your favorite dreams come true:
Only problem is that Peloosey isn’t in there with ‘em.

And Lynch.

And Boxer.


Unplugged
ROLLOVER

Sorry Ron; Boxer never laughs

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Lynch-Hillary

Holder's Mustache                           







New York Post: FBI Agents Tell Us Lynch and Clinton Struck a Deal on That Plane
[...]
In an unusual move, FBI agents working the Hillary Clinton e-mail case had to sign a special form reminding them not to blab about the probe to anyone unless called to testify.

Sources said they had never heard of the “Case Briefing Acknowledgment” form being used before, although all agents must initially sign nondisclosure agreements to obtain security clearance.

“This is very, very unusual. I’ve never signed one, never circulated one to others,” said one retired FBI chief.

Meanwhile, FBI agents expressed their “disappointment” over FBI Director James Comey’s decision not to recommend charges against Clinton, sources close to the matter told The Post.

“FBI agents believe there was an inside deal put in place after the Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton tarmac meeting,” said one source.

Another source from the Justice Department was “furious” with Comey, saying he’s “managed to piss off right and left.” [FULL]

As Congress moves forward with impeachment of IRS CommissionerAhem.

Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Loretta Lynch;Worse than Holder



BLACK RACISTS                            


Loretta Lynch: White guilt forever;
Muslim guilt never

[....] Catherine Engelbrecht's take on Loretta Lynch's virulent anti-white words and interpretation of law is spot-on.  Loretta Lynch will not name ISIS for the same reason she did not name or prosecute any of the criminals from the riots in Ferguson or Baltimore.  She redacted the word "Islamic" – and any intimation of it – from the murderer's own words for the same reason black-on-black crime will always be caused by lax gun laws.  It's so simple: white guilt forever; black guilt, Mexican guilt, Moslem guilt never.  [FULL]

Sunday, May 03, 2015

Black Panther Monkey Shines

   HELTER SKELTER                          
Provoking Racial Unrest
                                                               
 
NEW BLACK PANTHER HEAD: LIKE FOUNDING FATHERS, WE ARE WILLING TO KILL FOR BLACK NATION


WARNING: Profanity/Strong Racial Language

This Week on the New Black Panther Party’s “Black Power Radio,” national chairman Hashim Nzinga said since America has “declared war on us,” evidenced by “military police in the black neighborhood” protecting the rich, the New Black Panthers should be looked upon as Founding Fathers who declare war and are “willing to die or kill to save our babies and to save a black nation that is dying before our eyes.”

Nzinga said, “America is about protecting the rich and the powerful.”

He added, “We pay taxes. They have declared war on us and it’s nothing but state racism.”

“So if we say we are at war, we should be applauded like George Washington,” Nzinga continued. “We should be applauded like Thomas Jefferson. We should be applauded like the Founding Fathers of the country.” [full]

“This is not the hate hour, this is the love hour,”he added. “We have to love ourselves enough to be willing to die or kill to save our babies and to save a black nation that is dying before our eyes.”TEXT

Our Founders goal was to establish a "Black Nation?"