Global Warming Poop

Climate Change Report Is Sabotage from Inside the White House RUSH: Look at CNN’s little headline there: “Trump dismissals of science, intelligence community, and Russia move –” Trump is not dismissing science! Trump is dismissing deep state efforts to sabotage his administration. We had a call up here a moment ago. The caller went away. The caller wanted to know if Trump was going to be having to fight every day, multiple times a day, for every little thing he wants to get done. The answer is yes. SCROLL Nov 26, 2018 https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Listen247.pnghttps://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Watch.png RUSH: Look at CNN’s little headline there: “Trump dismissals of science, intelligence community, and Russia move –” Trump is not dismissing science! Trump is dismissing deep state efforts to sabotage his administration. We had a call up here a moment ago. The caller went away. The caller wanted to know if Trump was going to be having to fight every day, multiple times a day, for every little thing he wants to get done. The answer is yes. https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/APP-062518-CNN-Fake-News-1.jpgNow, this climate report that the Trump administration put out, folks, it’s caca. I’m gonna give you an example. One of the parts of this report talks about the devastating flooding in Houston from the hurricane that went through there as an example of climate change. This climate change report, people have asked me, how can the Trump administration put out a report like this, which is diametrically opposed to Trump and what Trump believes? The answer is that there are all kinds of deeply embedded deep staters in Washington. Whenever somebody’s president, everything in the executive branch is called the “name of the president’s” administration: the Trump administration, which implies that everything happening is related to the president because the president wants it to happen. Well, not so in this case. The deep state has people all over — in the intelligence community, got ’em in the FDA, they’ve got ’em in the EPA, they’ve got ’em at the FDA, they’ve got ’em at NASA, they’ve got ’em everywhere! Trump hasn’t been able to weed out everyone. In fact, David Bossie and Corey Lewandowski have a new book out. This is their second book in two years. You know, they were ranking members of the Trump election campaign staff. And their book is devoted to the examples and the existence of people in the White House who are trying to undermine Trump, in the administration. Not at some bureaucracy, but actually in the White House. White House staff, West Wing staff. I saw Lewandowski on TV today being interviewed. And this is an ongoing problem. And let me ask you if you remember something. Do you remember when the first impetus existed for Trump to declassify all of the FBI documents that would finally reveal what the actual beginning of the Trump-Russia investigation was, what actually triggered it? Remember, there were all kinds of different explanations. George Stephanopoulos telling the Australia ambassador that he had heard that the Russians had Hillary emails, and that turned out to be bogus. And the FBI has provided three or four different explanations of starting points. But we don’t really know what the starting point was. Those documents would tell us. So everybody’s been saying to Trump, reveal ’em, declassify ’em and release these documents. And he hasn’t. And I have posited that one of the reasons why is that Trump may think that he profits from being seen by his supporters as a political victim. So maybe, in his mind, he profits or helps keep his support group tied to him by being seen as a victim of the deep state. And I’m wondering if that’s not a factor in this book. Because it’s one thing for six months into an administration to have the story that there’s all kinds of saboteurs in there, saboteurs maybe held over from the previous administration. But the West Wing, the West Wing, the president’s office, that’s his people. How in the world can there be saboteurs in there? Trump hires everybody in there, or delegates the hiring of those people. So who are these saboteurs? Now, for the same story, now we’ve got a book about the saboteurs in the administration? Why are they still there? Why haven’t they been identified and rooted out? The book — I haven’t read it. I’m gonna assume that the book knows who these people are. Maybe they don’t. But how do you write a book if you don’t know who they are? You’ve gotta know who they are if you know what the sabotage is. So I’m thinking maybe there’s an ongoing political theory within the White House that Trump seen as a victim of unseen saboteurs helps him stay solidified with his voters. I don’t know this to be the case, but I’ll tell you, I — you tell me — I may be on thin ice with some of you here. But after two years don’t you think you might have made some headway in getting rid of some saboteurs? We’re talking West Wing. I’m not suggesting that they should have been able to get rid of every saboteur and every deepest lifer that’s at the FDA or OSHA. I mean, there’s so many damn agencies that you couldn’t get rid. And it’s increasingly tough to fire federal employees anyway. But in the West Wing, in the actual administration, the fact that there’s still saboteurs running around in the White House on Trump’s staff? I don’t know. If that’s true, it’s time to get rid of ’em! Go and write books about the fact they exist and how they’re trying to undermine the president, but get rid of ’em at the same time. There’s no reason for this. There’s no reason the president just sit there and tolerate or deal with saboteurs or deep staters or people participating in a silent coup, which is exactly what is happening. There’s no question that a silent coup began and is ongoing. And this climate change report is a classic example. So back to CNN. Now, you people say, “Rush, you sound” — what was the word, disheartened? I’m not disheartened. You know, I’ve told you, some days I can’t take it either, watching the media some days I need to follow my own advice and turn it off. I’m watching CNN this morning, moments ago, actually, Tom DeLay, who lives in Sugar Land, Texas, which is suburban Houston, was being interviewed about the devastating climate change report put out by the Trump administration. https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/APP-012318-Climate-Change-Global-Warming-Hoax-1.jpgIt was released the day after Thanksgiving, last Friday, and the media is off there saying, “They tried to bury it, they tried to bury it by releasing it on a slow news day, but we were too smart for ’em, we’re not gonna let them bury it.” It was precisely released by the proponents on the day after Thanksgiving in collusion with the news media to make it a big deal because it is a slow news day, so it could be the focal point! So people are supposed to sit here and believe the Trump administration is warning us of climate change while Trump personally doesn’t believe in it. And it’s meant to convey that Trump doesn’t even know what’s going on in his own administration, that Trump is so detached, that Trump is so distant, that Trump is so disinvolved, so stupid, that he doesn’t even know what his administration’s doing! That’s the message. That’s the purpose. When in fact a bunch of deep staters put this thing together, and it’s a crock like every other climate change projection story has been. It’s back to warning us we’ve only got 10 more years, the final 10 years to fix it, and if we don’t, we’re toast by the end of the century, meaning another, what, 84 years, 82 years. That’s all we’ve got, folks. We’re toast. If we don’t fix it in 10 years, by the next 82 years, we’re done. And they cite the floods in Houston after the hurricane. And Tom DeLay was trying to tell this brain-dead infobabe — are these people this dumb and stupid? Which is infuriating if they are. Or are they just this activist engaged? And half of them I think are this stupid, I think they’re just plain dumb. They’re not curious, and they just buy hook, line, and sinker everything in the leftist agenda. And it might have been the case here. I’m not gonna name the anchor. I don’t want to create hate mail, none of that. That’s not the point here. It doesn’t matter who on CNN it was. They’re interchangeable. And this babe was asking DeLay, “Well, what about all of the floods, the climate change report says the flooding had never been seen before in Houston for any kind of a hurricane, and it’s an example of what we’re headed for.” And DeLay kept trying to tell her, “No, no, no, no, the hurricane didn’t cause the flooding. It was some bad levees, like in New Orleans, a lot of money had been appropriated to build up some levees and some flood walls and the money was not spent, they were not in a strong state, they gave way.” She wasn’t even open to the possibility. She immediately thought DeLay was lying to her or was full of it or what have you, and was prepared to buy hook, line, and sinker this report. This report, like every other climate change report, promising doom and gloom is nothing more than a made-up, pseudoscientific document. There is no consensus in science, and yet they continue to rely on what a consensus of scientists say. The truth is, global temperatures — Investor’s Business Daily has it today in an editorial — global temperatures the past two years are plummeting. There isn’t any warming. Now, the left will say, “Well, yeah, that’s ’cause of all the smoke from the fires that are brought about by global warming. And the volcanoes brought about by global warming.” You know, there’s even a story that we’re causing climate change on the Moon? Because we’re aiming so many satellites and missions to the Moon that we’re causing climate change. It’s gotten out of hand, it’s so ridiculous. But the point is there are ongoing efforts within the so-called Trump administration to undermine and sabotage him and his staff multiple times a day. And this climate change report is just one example of it. Damian Housman I'm a Democrat I Loot the Treasury Thank You For Your Support MORE: Global Warming: Another Doomsday Climate Model Flunks A Math Test More from Archives

Borrrrring

Global Warming Poop

Wait.  Why am I even acknowledging this story? Friday’s CBS This Morning eagerly picked up on the defense of the climate change agenda, as co-host John Dickerson declared: The Washington Post says that in a fast-warming world, the recent cold wave was “exceptionally weird.” Scientists say the recent crushing cold will become increasingly rare. They say that given how much the climate has warmed, the cold blast was 15 times less likely than it would have been a hundred years ago

Gift this to someone that needs it

a major award

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever's speech at the Nobel Laureates meeting 1st July 2015. Ivar points out the mistakes which Obama makes in his speeches about global warming, and shares other not-well known facts about the state of the climate. How the Global Warming Scare Began A great scientist named Roger Revelle had Al Gore in his class at Harvard and the Global Warming campaign was born. Revelle tried to calm things down years later, but Gore said Revelle was Senile and refused to debate. John Coleman documents the entire story and shows how our tax dollars are perpetuating the Global Warming alarmist campaign even though temperatures have not risen in years and years. Climate Scientists Laugh at Global Warming Hysteria Respected Australian scientists laugh at Julia Gillard, David Suzuki and other climate change drama queens. Professor Bob Carter of James Cook University is a Marine Geologist. Global warming Is a Blatant Lie & this Short video proves it . I am confident that once you watch this video you will see exactly what we are all up against. Global Warming Debunked at Senate Hearing There was a Little Ice Age a few hundred years ago that we were warming from. And there was a cooling period in the 1970's that we were warming from. This was also when climate scientists were declaring that an Ice Age was to occur within 10 years. Al Gore's Inconvenient SCAM, Lies versus Lord Monckton Truth and Logic Journalist and filmmaker Phelim McAleer (Mine Your Own Business, Not Evil Just Wrong) attempts to ask Al Gore a question about 'Climategate' emails at the UN Climate Change Conference. Al Gore's Press Secretary grabs his McAleer's microphone and UN security guard pulls the cable from the microphone. Hey, I'm a missionary.  This is what missionaries do.  I hate liars.

another Alarmist

Another Climate Alarmist Admits  Real Motive Behind Warming Scare Skoonj

Top Physicist Bolts from AGW ....

Global Warming Crap

Top Physicist Bolts from Man Made Global Warming ‘Consensus’ And Says Obama Backed ‘Wrong Side’ .... * Freeman Dyson is a 91-year-old theoretical physicist who was a contemporary of Einstein at Princeton, has received multiple international awards for his scientific efforts, and has published numerous books and papers on a wide range of topics. “That is to me the central mystery of climate science. It is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious facts? ... I’m 100 per cent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this issue, and the Republicans took the right side.” Dyson is criticizing scientists who advance what he describes as an ‘agenda-driven’ perspective on global warming. In an interview with The Register, Dyson responded to questions about the forward he just wrote for a scientific paper that confronts the “overrated” concerns about CO2 in the atmosphere: “That is to me the central mystery of climate science. It is not a scientific mystery but a human mystery. How does it happen that a whole generation of scientific experts is blind to obvious facts?” Dyson, who describes himself as 100% Democrat, strongly disagreed with President Obama: “It’s very sad that in this country, political opinion parted [people’s views on climate change]. I’m 100 per cent Democrat myself, and I like Obama. But he took the wrong side on this issue, and the Republicans took the right side.” Part of the issue, according to the interview and the CO2 paper, is that the scientific models that have been used to predict climate outcomes have been wrong: “What has happened in the past 10 years is that the discrepancies between what’s observed and what’s predicted have become much stronger. It’s clear now the models are wrong, but it wasn’t so clear 10 years ago. I can’t say if they’ll always be wrong, but the observations are improving and so the models are becoming more verifiable.” For example, NASA has admitted that it is unable to explain a 17-year hiatus in an average global temperature increase, which has led to 95% of manmade global warming projections being false. Explaining why this refusal of scientists to adjust their opinions when confronted with facts that seemingly refute their manmade global warming hypothesis, Dyson gives a couple of reasons. He suggests that there has been a confusion between “pollution,” something definitely man-made and solvable, and “climate change,” a feature of nature and mostly beyond the control of humanity. Furthermore, he also asserts that there’s not only a “large community of people who make their money by scaring the public,” but an element of groupthink at play, as well: “Real advances in science require a different cultural tradition, with individuals who invent new tools to explore nature and are not afraid to question authority. Science driven by rebels and heretics searching for truth has made great progress in the last three centuries. But the new culture of scientific scepticism is a recent growth and has not yet penetrated deeply into our thinking. The old culture of group loyalty and dogmatic belief is still alive under the surface, guiding the thoughts of scientists as well as the opinions of ordinary citizens.” Dyson concluded with an assertion and an appeal to dispassionately evaluating facts: “Climatic effects observed in the real world are much less damaging than the effects predicted by the climate models, and have also been frequently beneficial. I am hoping that the scientists and politicians who have been blindly demonizing carbon dioxide for 37 years will one day open their eyes and look at the evidence.” If anything, Dyson’s disputation of manmade global warming just adds to the list of scientific voices who are bucking the received “consensus” on temperatures.   (cuzzin ricky) At 91-years of age, the very idea that " a whole generation a fair percentage of climate science academia" could be corrupted—as they so utterly have been—by the lure of (Liberal) government grant money (with their acquiescence hinging on it), is too new school for Mr. Dyson to contemplate. Hell, I still have a hard time getting used to it.   * No, Mr. Dyson, Obama is backing his group's side of the AGW gambit.

More Climate Science Scandel

Global Warming Fade-Out   CLIMATE ALARMIST CAUGHT IN ‘LARGEST SCIENCE SCANDAL IN U.S. HISTORY’

The plan by climate alarmists to have other scientists imprisoned for their ‘global warming’ skepticism is backfiring horribly, and the chief alarmist is now facing a House investigation into what has been called “the largest science scandal in US history.”   Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX),  Chairman of the House Committee on Space, Science and Technology, has written to Professor Jagadish Shukla of George Mason University, in Virginia, requesting that he release all relevant documents pertaining to his activities as head of a non-profit organization called the Institute of Global Environment And Society. Smith has two main areas of concern. For many readers, though, perhaps the biggest take-home message of this extraordinary story is: Who do these climate alarmists think they are? First, the apparent engagement by the institute in “partisan political activity” – which, as a non-profit, it is forbidden by law from doing. Second, what precisely has the IGES institute done with the $63 million in taxpayer grants which it has received since 2001 and which appears to have resulted in remarkably little published research? For example, as Watts Up With That? notes, a $4.2 million grant from the National Science Foundation to one of the institute’s offshoots appears to have resulted in just one published paper. But the amount which has gone into the pockets of Shukla and his cronies runs into the many hundreds of thousands of dollars. In 2013 and 2014, for example, Shukla and his wife enjoyed a combined income in excess of $800,000 a year. Steve McIntyre, the investigator who shattered Michael Mann’s global-warming ‘Hockey Stick’ claim, has done a detailed breakdown of the sums involved. He calls it Shukla’s Gold. In 2001, the earliest year thus far publicly available, in 2001, in addition to his university salary (not yet available, but presumably about $125,000), Shukla and his wife received a further $214,496  in compensation from IGES (Shukla -$128,796; Anne Shukla – $85,700).  Their combined compensation from IGES doubled over the next two years to approximately $400,000 (additional to Shukla’s university salary of say $130,000), for combined compensation of about $530,000 by 2004. (continue) Skoonj This is Climate Nazi's Planned Parenthood moment. Common sense dictates that both movements become pariahs and disappear under the shame.  That this will not happen is testament to how utterly contemptuous ... ACH! No wonder the barbarians are at the gate.

Goodnight Chet ...

Washington, D.C. — Today, the Energy & Environment Legal Institute (E&E Legal), a 501 (c) (3) watchdog group, released an investigative report, Private Interests & Public Office: Coordination Between Governors, the Obama White House and the Tom Steyer-“Founded and Funded” Network of Advocacy Groups to Advance the “Climate” Agenda (and anappendix of source documents), revealing a vast, coordinated, three-track effort by public officials and private interests to promote EPA’s expansive, overreaching and economically devastating greenhouse gas rules, specifically the section 111(d) regulation to shut the nation’s fleet of existing coal-fired power plants, as well as the December Paris climate treaty President Obama is expected to sign to replace the Kyoto Protocol. “Our report pulls the curtain back on a carefully planned and heavily funded ‘orchestration’ by individuals who have placed their personal interests ahead of the public interest,” said Chris Horner, E&E Legal’s Senior Legal Fellow and the report’s author. The scheme took shape at a meeting in the White House in December 2013, after which the Obama administration launched coordinated with the “core group” of activist Democrat governors to design one of what we see are three tracks to promote the climate agenda The report is the product of open records requests over the course of a year at the federal level and nearly 30 offices in over a dozen states. The exposé contains appendices with over a hundred pages of source emails and attachments. It details a campaign to use public offices, in very close collaboration with wealthy benefactors, to advance and defend President Obama’s climate change regulatory and treaty agenda. This quasi-governmental campaign involves more than a dozen governors’ offices, with a parallel advocacy network and political operation funded and staffed by activists paid through ideologically , economically and politically motivated donors. The report released today points to emails obtained by E&E Legal’s campaign without litigation, but also in federal district court; others are the subject of oral arguments made last week in court in Richmond, Virginia, and a new suit just filed against the Governor of Kentucky. The latter complaint objects to a false “no records” claim — about records that this report proves do in fact exist, and even quotes from, but which are being kept from the public by a governor who claims to be appalled by EPA rules his office was quietly a “core group” promoter of for the past two years. This report is timely given President Obama’s ongoing tour to promote the same EPA rules that these governors and “major environmental donors” scheme to promote in the correspondence released today. This includes a stop today at Harry Reid’s “clean energy economy” conference, curiously also sponsored by the same donors as those playing a leading role in today’s report. Indeed these emails E&E Legal uncovered also show this campaign was developed with the early, active support and participation of the White House, which went beyond enthusiastically embracing the plan and follow up meetings and calls, to even directing the governors to what one green trade-press outlet calls a “shadowy group” affiliated with then-Chief of Staff John Podesta. The White House’s followup actions , as one governor’s aide praised them, were “moving dials”. Podesta also convinced the governors’ offices that their plan should be broken into separate, complementary pillars. The latest email obtained, from May of this year, shows the governors’ campaign arranging to coordinate with the State Department. The scheme took shape at a meeting in the White House in December 2013, after which the Obama administration launched coordinated with the “core group” of activist Democrat governors to design one of what we see are three tracks to promote the climate agenda. One was run by the Steyer network and left-wing foundations. Another is run by governors with green groups, which are “useful” but whose “standard NGO shaming strategy might not deliver”. A third, run by the White House includes, in the words of a senior aide, “a few other tracks with private sector and unusual allies”. Nearly every aspect of this effort, from the key early players to the funders and even the director the governors’ campaign hired — housed by some state’s taxpayers in the Hall of States in Washington, DC, overhead paid for by as-yet unknown means — has direct ties to a scandal involving “clean energy” donors and conflicts of interest, one which felled Oregon’s sitting governor earlier this year. In what is possibly the most intriguing element, seemingly out of an episode of “House of Cards”, Democratic governors’ aides repeatedly reference a plan of “creative engagement” to “compel” certain electric utilities — those subject to their jurisdiction whose businesses cross lines into states led by Republicans — to bring “red state” governors around to support the EPA rules: “[B]ecause there are key utilities whose service territories cross red and blue states Governors in these states could quietly engineer a breakthrough strategy that compels utilities in key red states to lead the charge to win over a key Governor, rather than rely on a standard NGO-shaming strategy that might not deliver.” The “core group” of governors also coordinated with Democratic mega-donor Tom Steyer and his managing partner, Ted White, who directed them to “affiliated groups that we founded and fund (such as NextGen Climate Action, or Next Generation, or AEE [Advanced Energy Economy]” . Those groups in turn underwrote consultants and activists to hand-hold governors through implementing the Obama EPA’s rules, keeping them from the clutches of the “just say no” states. This core group soon expanded to more than a dozen states, coast-to- coast, embracing a four-point plan which they soon called the Governor’s Climate Compact or GCC, which was ultimately rebranded as the Governors’ Climate Accord or GCA and now goes by the name of the Governors Clean Energy Initiative (none of which have any internet footprint whatsoever, and begging the question who is indeed paying for its director and other overhead). The emails do reflect an awareness that the agenda’s lack of popularity in the “flyover states” necessitated a flexible timeline and keeping some offices’ involvement quiet, specifically citing elections as a concern. “This is the 5th transparency report in a series that E&E Legal has published on the ‘green movement’ and its network of public, private, and business interests, and what is clear is that 1%-ers are using ‘climate’ policies to destroy politically disfavored industries in order to transfer wealth to the politically preferred,” said Craig Richardson, E&E Legal Executive Director. “The campaign by self-serving individuals must be made known to the public as policymakers consider this plan that will destroy parts of our economy and ruin the most efficient, affordable, and clean energy system ever created.” [WATTS Full  Megillah] Bear with me here.  That story documenting more Climate Change fraud is almost hum-drum for us who monitor the green turds climate activists litter the landscape with.  For some mysterious reason, the first parallel that came to mind this morning was Bobby Baker, because this is symptomatic of real cancer. In August 1963 when Bobby Baker, the Secretary to the Majority Leader of the Senate and a protégé of Johnson's, came under investigation by the Senate Rules Committee for allegations of bribery and financial malfeasance. One witness alleged that Baker had arranged for the witness to give kickbacks for the [then] Vice President. Baker resigned in October, and the investigation did not expand to Johnson. (Compare to Spiro Agnew's experience) If you lived through the LBJ era, and especially if you've read Robert Caro's magnificent four volume LBJ biography, you know that he's the third most corrupt president in our history (or thereabouts).  The Bobby Baker scandal was nightly news fodder for what seemed like forever back then.  It bored me silly, and I didn't look into the particulars.  All I knew was that, like IKE's Chief of Staff's Vicuna Coat, that cost him his job, the smallest impropriety could topple the powerful (I had yet to read Caro).  It's what we all expected. So today we have—what?  The, 4th? or 10th? revelation of major fraud by radicals intent on foisting new taxes and controls on energy, and in the process gain control over our every movement?   We have a government, this government, that even by LBJ standards is so over the top corrupt that we, who once watched black and white televised, 15 minute long  nightly news, are in shock.  It's useless to compare how Huntley-Brinkley might have reported on things Obama back then, because Obama could never—ever have been nominated with his nebulous background—even of he was Irish Catholic!  So, that's the journey I've taken.  Hell, it's the journey taken by every American since 1776, up until 1992ish. You are what you eat. As for me, I will find some comfort in these words from Thomas Jefferson, as I interpret them, and realize how fortunate a life I've had. "Every constitution, then, and every law, naturally expires at the end of nineteen years. If it be enforced longer, it is an act of force, and not of right."  If this means that the populace are reduced to being hedonistic twats, so be it.  They have the right to go fuck themselves. Goodnight America.  Unless ... .

An ignorant man name Brown says stupid stuff

and other goofy bastards

California Gov. Jerry Brown said in an interview with NBC's "Meet the Press" that Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz's position on climate change makes him "absolutely unfit to be running for office." Responding to comments made by Cruz on "Late Night with Seth Meyers," Democratic Governor Brown said of Cruz, "That man betokens such a level of ignorance and a direct falsification of the existing scientific data. It's shocking and I think that man has rendered himself absolutely unfit to be running for office." Unhappily, as a result of the mediocre quality of science education, many people do not know how to evaluate either a scientific hypothesis in general, or AGW in particular -- and irrespective of whatever anyone might think, because of how it is framed and evaluated, AGW is no more than a hypothesis. Let's be clear here, for the umpteenth time.   Gov Moon Beam is talking about AGW (Anthropogenic Global Warming).  That is, he claims man causes global warming by using hair spray, fossil fuels, and blowing farts (I am not making that up), and that is scientific fact. Bullshit.  His is science without Scientific Method.  It's pop science, and not true.  It is bunch of old communists trying to use the issue to gain absolute control of any economy.  This left-wing movement is populated by some very dangerous ass-holes too (Google "kill climate change deniers");  so Jerry Brown is, at best, a smug but ignorant Liberal twat playing with fire.  At worst, he makes false and incendiary statements for political gain and ought be arrested.  That's also true of anyone you know who pushes AGW. Tell them.  Call them now, and tell them. Unless it's someone you're trying to seduce, then wait until that thrill is gone.

And that's the way it was ...

And That’s the Way It Was: In 1972, Cronkite Warned of ‘New Ice Age [...] Some winters are “bone-chilling,” like this one has been, others are mild, and some like the 1972-1973 winter started early and harsh, but grew surprising mild. That was the same year Walter Cronkite was “the most trusted man in America” in 1972, according to polls. A 2009 CBS obituary for the journalist said, “Cronkite was the biggest name in television news, the king of the anchormen; in fact, he was the reporter for whom the term ‘anchorman’ was coined. On Sept. 11, 1972, Cronkite cited scientists’ predictions that there was a “new ice age” coming. He called that prediction from British scientist Hubert Lamb “a bit of bad news.” [...] “But now -- unearthed from bowels of media archives -- comes none other than Walter Cronkite reporting on fears of a coming ice age in 1972. Having Cronkite's image and face discussing global cooling fears reveals the fickleness of the climate change claims.” “Climate fear promoters switched effortlessly from global cooling fears in the 1970s to global warming fears in the 1980s. In the present day, the phrase 'global warming' has lost favor in favor of 'climate change' or 'global climate disruption' or even 'global weirding,’ Morano added. “'Settled science' has never seemed so unsettled.” - See more: - Students of Ho-Chi-Cronkite's political agenda know that, had he lived longer, he would today be standing four-square with statist climate liars.  But he's dead. Say amen.

Fiddling with temperature data for fun and profit

... and other lying bastards                          "[garbled] If they ever hit you with it just say 'no' and go on, there's nothing they can do." Bill Clinton,1992.  The father of the modern Democrat Party

FULL How does this climate fraud fiasco survive?  Forget focusing on climate data studies.  Concentrate instead on the number of lies, and inaccuracies  exposed over more than 30 years.  Who was it doing the lying? Who used faulty data?  The answers exclusively point to the AGW lobby, and that makes them unreliable at best, and many of them flat-out liars. When did we stop holding liars accountable? Sheesh Related:  ON GLOBAL WARMING, THE SCIENTIFIC BATTLE RAGES

Real Science and AGW Science

and other lying  bastards

“ Scientists abandon highly publicized claim about cosmic find Brian Keating-Real Scientist NEW YORK- Scientists who made headlines last March by announcing that they'd found long-sought evidence about the early universe are now abandoning that claim. "It's disappointing," he said in a telephone interview Friday after the European Space Agency publicized the results. "It's like finding out there's no Santa Claus. But it's important to know the truth." That signal is what the researchers claimed they had found in observations of the sky taken from the South Pole, in a project called BICEP2. But now, in a new paper submitted for publication, "we are effectively retracting the claim," said Brian Keating of the University of California, San Diego, a member of the BICEP2 team. Read more here: “ Phony climate scientists trade empirical processes for cash and communism. Phony scientist Michael Mann and another liar Climategate Files Climate Fail Files Climate Liar Files Climate Reference Files ” ”

But 38% is close enough ...

Nasa climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record... but we're only 38% sure we were right  cuzzin ricky Evidently, Yes

Beating Dead AGW Whores

and other goofy bastards

“ Climate change PROVED to be 'nothing but a lie', claims top meteorologist THE debate about climate change is finished - because it has been categorically proved NOT to exist, one of the world's leading meteorologists has claimed. For the umteenth time skoonj The Climate State Okay, the BIG LIE is still being propagated by the media, if only by neglecting to report the myriad scandals plaguing the AGW scam.  And, yes, too many dull-witted activist school teachers are still shilling for the movement, and plumping their charges' brains with climatecrap—and have been for so long that many of them are now of voting age. Still, at some point,  people who still buy into the leftist, man-caused climate change scam must be held accountable for what is nothing less than their willful ignorance, which if not stopped will bring a nation to economic ruin, and enslavement on the Liberal plantation.  Yes moms and dads, it's time FOR YOU to tell your brats that climate change is ongoing, natural, and unchangeable! And anyone who says differently is evil, which will come out from under their beds at night and and eat them. Because  they will.  Sheesh! ”