SMART PILL STOCK NOSE DIVES!

D'UH!

‘Nearly All’ Recent Global Warming Is Fabricated, Study Finds

Algore; Poop Corn

GREEN NAZIS   An inconvenient review of Gore’s “An Inconvenient Sequel”

“Hey Al,” I asked, “I just saw your sequel ‘Inconvenient’.” Gore: “Oh great, thank you!” Question: “My friends make fun of me about the 10-year tipping point, what do I tell them?” Gore: “Well, we gotta keep working.” Gore then gave me a momentary stare, ignored the question, entered his “Executive Car Service” Chevy Suburban and drove off. I read the WaTimes' "Al Gore warns that Trump is ignoring weather apocalypse" this morning.  This takedown of Man Bear Pig  is better than anything I'm up to doing. January 23, 2017    by CFACT Undercover,  An Inconvenient Sequel to Al Gore’s An Inconvenient Truth premiered Thursday night at Sundance. I joined the crowd at the film festival’s Eccles theater where my reaction ranged from bored, to emotional, to appalled that I let this film manipulate my emotions even for a moment. The film is not aimed at thinking people. If there’s a legitimate case to be made for global warming, this is not it. It doesn’t even try. Instead Gore abandons science in favor of tired global warming talking points that have long been debunked. It’s shameless. It’s also all about Gore, whom the film portrays as someone anyone can walk up to and chat with in depth. He tries to come off as an average person with a heroic passion. Sadly for Gore, whenever his climate advocacy gets momentum he hits barriers: A satellite he didn’t get to launch, the Bush administration, the terrorist attacks at Paris’s Bataclan, India abandoning renewables for coal, and now Trump. If you’re not careful you actually feel sorry for him. Gore blames fires, droughts, tornadoes, etc. on “climate change,” but for much of the film remains fixated on floods, the solution to which he tells us, is converting to one hundred percent renewable energy. The film did a good job of taking the famously stiff Gore and (when he’s not showing PowerPoint slides) presenting him as likable, funny and tireless. Not, however, humble. Gore is the hero of his own film, which works hard to chalk up any gains the warming campaign has made to Gore himself. We see Gore after the UN adopted its Paris climate agreement walking down a hall alone in a way that implies that he has just accomplished the great feat of his life. He loosens his tie as if to say, “I did it and now I’m going home.” In scenes where Gore’s eyes start to water, you could hear and see sniffling and tears in the audience. A man of at least 6 foot 3 sitting in front of me began to cry while his lady partner rubbed his back.  Of course (excepting me and few others) this was an audience of true believers. It remains to be seen whether this film can gain a mainstream audience and whether they will be similarly affected. In scenes where Gore whips outs his iPhone and starts talking to various people in an attempt to coax India away from from coal, you can clearly see that his phone’s screen is black.   I’ve had an iPhone for six years and my phone’s face is never black unless it’s off. Those scenes appeared fudged and poked a few little holes for me in their credibility. In a scene at Gore Farms, where Gore looks at photos in a house built by his parents, I was surprised that the “farm” is decorated with white carpets, white furniture and white bedspreads. None of my friends’ working farms would go all-in for white. These are nothing, however, to the whoppers the film tells about the climate. The film shamelessly exploits examples of extreme natural weather (as climate campaigners are wont to do) and the human suffering that comes with them. When the science doesn’t support the warming campaign’s argument they scare, scare, scare. “Every night on the news,” Gore tells us, “is like a nature hike through the Book of Revelations.” In a scene Gore is so proud of that he released it on the internet, he somberly opines that, “ten years ago when the movie An Inconvenient Truth came out, the single most criticized scene in that movie was an animated scene showing that the combination of sea level rise and storm surge would put the ocean water into the 911 memorial site which was then under construction. And people said, ‘that’s ridiculous, what a terrible exaggeration.’” They then cut to scenes of water from Hurricane Sandy inundating the subway station near the memorial.  Next we see New York Governor Andrew Cuomo loudly attributing this to “climate change” and proclaiming that this makes the warming argument “undeniable.” Gore shows us crosses in the Philippines marking the graves of those who succumbed to Typhoon Haiyan. He shows us melting ice in Greenland and asks his audience where all the water went; Miami of course, as he predicted in his first film. If Gore has an explanation for how the water made it from Greenland to Miami while bypassing the rest of the Eastern Seaboard, he doesn’t share it. Nor does he tell the audience that Antarctica, Earth’s serious ice chest, has inconveniently failed to melt with southern ice hitting record highs. Gore blames fires, droughts, tornadoes, etc. on “climate change,” but for much of the film remains fixated on floods, the solution to which he tells us, is converting to one hundred percent renewable energy. The fact that sea level is only rising a tiny one to three millimeters per year, as it has since before the industrial revolution, is not the sort of thing Gore feels a need to share with his audience. Nor will you come away from the film informed that climate computer models have been predicting warming that hasn’t occurred since their creation. I had a chance to question Gore himself.  As the former Vice-President and Nobel Prize winner was trudging through the snow to his oversized Chevy Suburban SUV, I asked him an inconvenient question. “Hey Al,” I asked, “I just saw your sequel ‘Inconvenient’.” Gore: “Oh great, thank you!” Question: “My friends make fun of me about the 10-year tipping point, what do I tell them?” Gore: “Well, we gotta keep working.” Gore then gave me a momentary stare, ignored the question, entered his “Executive Car Service” Chevy Suburban and drove off. An Inconvenient Sequel aims for your heart, not your brain.  If you’re prepared to unquestionably accept what the climate establishment tells you on faith, or the kind of person ready to believe that windmills and solar panels could have protected Miami from king tides, ground subsidence and plate tectonics, Al Gore made this film for you. If you’d like a deeper understanding of the techniques Gore’s film employs to manipulate the facts and its audience give CFACTs Climate Hustle, available on disc or to stream immediately, a try. SOURCE - C-Fact

Filed under 'Ignorant, hateful, twats"

Montana Democrat Rob Quist Encourages Climate Skeptics to Consider Suicide Rather than refuting the Republican nominee’s argument, he encouraged climate skeptics to consider ending their lives. He said, “To me this a cumulative thing, you cannot just say closing one plant or not is going to make a difference. This is something that the entire world needs to address and you know what, if any of you that feel like this is not a problem, I challenge you to go into your car in your garage, start your car and see what happens there.” Let's assume his Republican opponent had an appropriate response.

Eat My Shorts

Trump denies climate change, but could one day be its victim Authority:CNN NEWS Data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration show that Trump's Mar-a-Lago Club and his condominiums in Hollywood, Florida, would be partially submerged if sea level rose three feet by the end of the century. Already, Hollywood experiences more incidents of tidal flooding. [FULL]

Kamala Harris tries to burn ‘science deniers’

Global Warming Fade-Out

Senator-elect Kamala Harris tries to burn ‘science deniers’ by torching a MONSTER straw man California Attorney General and soon-to-be U.S. Senator Kamala Harris is entering national politics leaving no doubt where she stands on “climate change” and those who disagree: however .... ASIDE: Andrew Zimmern's Bizarre Foods is a favorite.  Recently he was in Romania, or some such, where villagers were slaughtering hogs for a traditional communal pig roast.  The head dude said they were worried because the EU were about to ban this sort of "home cooking," in favor of licensed controlled operations.  That's what came to mind just now with this story about Kamala Harris.  The gold ring for one worlders (supports or believes in any of various movements to establish a world government or a federation of nations stronger than any individual nation, for the purpose of promoting the common good.) is climate law.  Because under it's aegis a government  agency can control every aspect of  human endeavor.  Can trump legislation.  Can tax or ban anything that produces heat. Today's Democrat Party are all-in one worlders. And they were soooooo close to subjecting the United States to various "treaties" that would, in effect, give the UN dominion over our economy.  Trumps election then was like losing a  winning mega-buck lottery ticket. Oh.  There's this ... Trump Picks Scott Pruitt, Climate Change Denialist, to Lead EPA

Scott Pruitt to head the EPA

Trump’s EPA pick is causing green heads to explode It’s like Pearl Harbor Day for them, like somebody made a sneak attack.. Some reactions on Twitter: “The naming of a climate denier like Scott Pruitt to head the EPA is nothing less than an effort to undermine the agency’s core mission to safeguard our environment. On the campaign trail President-elect Trump vowed to break America’s commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement, to open our public lands to drilling, and to dismantle the EPA. By nominating Scott Pruitt he’s making it clear he intends to follow through on those promises. UPDATE: as I (Anthony Watts) was writing this, I got this press release: CLCV Statement on Pruitt’s Nomination for EPA Administrator Oakland, CA – In response to news reports that Trump will nominate Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt as EPA Administrator, California League of Conservation Voters CEO Sarah Rose issued the following statement: “The naming of a climate denier like Scott Pruitt to head the EPA is nothing less than an effort to undermine the agency’s core mission to safeguard our environment. On the campaign trail President-elect Trump vowed to break America’s commitment to the Paris Climate Agreement, to open our public lands to drilling, and to dismantle the EPA. By nominating Scott Pruitt he’s making it clear he intends to follow through on those promises. “Pruitt has sued the EPA, has fought environmental protections enacted by President Obama, and has denied the science of climate change itself. He represents the very threats the EPA should protect against, not be headed by. The California League of Conservation Voters calls on our Senators to reject this wrong-headed nomination which puts our families and communities at risk. “California has a unique role to play. We are the sixth largest economy in the world. The decisions we make here, the policies we create, and how we respond to Trump’s attacks on our environmental protections will determine the pace of progress these next four years. We must organize to defend our hard-fought victories because every Californian deserves clean air to breathe and clean water to drink.” 259 thoughts on “Trump’s EPA pick is causing green heads to explode” (Here's one) Obama’s EPA thinks we should sacrifice ourselves for climate change. But ‘climate change’ is leftist manufactured bs. NASA with NOAA has engaged in data manipulation of the highest order, whose sole intention is to produce a narrative opposed by the evidence. And in fact there is ZERO evidence that CO2 affect climate temperatures at all. CO2 does not lead but *follows* changes in temperatures. This outstanding 4 minute video makes that point about CO2 clear as day: Thank You President Trump!

Douchbags Suck

Should We Be Having Kids In The Age Of Climate Change?

Ferorelli, 33, and Kallman, 32, are both in committed relationships, and in the throes of this problem. Ferorelli recently helped her widowed mother pack up her house, saving cherished items with the unspoken assumption that they are for a next generation. And yet, when she imagines raising a child, Ferorelli says she can't help but envision the nightmare scenarios that have dogged her since she first heard the term "global warming" in elementary school. "Knowing that I gave that future to somebody is something that just doesn't sit very well," she says. At the New Hampshire meeting, 67-year-old Nancy Nolan tells two younger women that people didn't know about climate change in the 1980s when she had her kids. Once her children were grown, "I said to them, 'I hope you never have children,' which is an awful thing to say," Nolan says, her voice wavering. "It can bring me to tears easily." She adds that of course people are driven to procreate, and you can't really tell them not to. One woman looks a little stunned. She's not a climate activist — just tagged along with a friend — and says she had no idea that deciding not to have kids because of the climate was even a thing. These aren't the first would-be parents to ask whether it's fair to bring a child into the world. U.S. birth rates plummeted during the Great Depression. Many also must have thought twice amid warnings of overpopulation in the 1960s and '70s, and under the threat of nuclear holocaust. [NPR BABBLE CONT] Per usual, what's particularly galling is this pap is being distributed using public funds.  See Mr. Watt's rebuttal: Climate Philosopher Demands a Tax on Children.  Wait.  The very fact that you would consider reading actual climate science means there is no way in hell that you pay attention to the cloistered mind rants of the NPR set to begin with.  Yikes.  It seems I have unintentionally subjected you to climate porn.  Sorry.

Oh My. Al Gore is disappointed with Trump

It just keeps getting better! Trump on Climate Change - He's even worse than we thought.  Al Gore?

The Big SUCK!

Global Warming Fade-Out

The Terriific Storm That Will Unfreeze the North Pole! WILL SUCK AIR OUT OF MIAMI TODAY!!! OMFG!!!! Women and Children Suffer Most "But later this week (today) , something extraordinary will happen: Air temperatures at the Earth’s most northernly region, in the middle of winter, will rise above freezing for only the second time on record.  It will bring strong winds and pressure as low as is typically seen during hurricanes. That low pressure will suck air out of the planet’s middle latitudes and send it rushing to the Arctic. " [...] " .... 2015 is the warmest year ever recorded. !" [The ATLANIC] Claim: "will rise above freezing for only the second time on record." You'd think the author would tell us what the first was, but no. Jumping to comments, this beauty " lost in the stars • 18 hours ago Somebody should warn Congress that this is happening, so it can do something to fix it. Here's an  antidote By the by, I will speculate that 90% of people who believe any of this also want Bernie Sanders for president.

Pasty Face Tactics

Under pressure, Miami-Dade gets new climate-change chief Miami Herald Weeks after bowing to environmentalists’ demands that he create the post, Miami-Dade Mayor  Carlos Gimenez named a veteran planner to coordinate the county’s response to climate change. (See "Piss for Climate-Change?" )

Global Clots

and other goofy bastards                          It was satisfying, and pompous of me, to think that I was the first to recognize that it would only follow the logic of  AGWers to blame the automobile for our Sun's (and Algore's favorite planet) cooling period. I mean, what else could it be?  There goes my Nobel for Best AGW Bitch Slap. The conceit that human production of carbon dioxide is capable of driving the earth’s climate is running smack into the sun. CO2 accounts for a mere 0.039% of the atmosphere, while the sun accounts for 99.86% of all of the mass in our entire solar system. And Ol’ Sol is not taking the insult lightly. Vencore Weather reports: For the past 5 days, solar activity has been very low and one measure of solar activity – its X-ray output – has basically flatlined in recent days (plot below courtesy NOAA/Space Weather Prediction Center). Not since cycle 14 peaked in February 1906 has there been a solar cycle with fewer sunspots. Bad news for warmists: Sun has entered 'weakest solar cycle in a century' - American Thinker

Some Salon guy ....

TEXT

“ Tea Party spawns GOP nightmare: How it’s already ruining the party’s ’16 strategy GOP elites want Americans to think the party's boring and safe again. Maybe someone should notify the Tea Party Salon article.  The author Elias Isquithrevels in the discomfiture the Tea Party are causing the Democrat Party wing of the GOP.  He makes some good points, but his bias is obvious as this Algorish "scientific consensus" blather shows.  [...] Or if you’d rather look at the Senate, where the aforementioned McConnell is nominally in control, think about Wednesday’s vote on climate change — namely, whether it exists and, if so, to what degree it’s humanity’s fault. While it’s true that only one senator, Mississippi’s Roger Wicker, felt compelled to disagree with the contention that the Earth’s climate is warming, most Republicans voted against a provision that would credit human mankind with “significantly” contributing to the problem. That is, needless to say, wildly at odds with scientific consensus across the globe (Ahem); and dismissing the conclusions of essentially all of the world’s qualified scientists is yet another thing your nice neighbor-accountant would be unlikely to do. To be fair, the Senate vote on climate change wasn’t something Republicans in the Senate forced on McConnell. Instead, it was an example of the kind of thumb-in-the-eye procedural move that the Senate’s now-minority Democrats will be able to pull off every once in a while that has no legislative significance but can, at its best, make the difference between the parties crystal clear. All the same, whatever short-term damage Democrats were able to inflict on the GOP paled in comparison to that which it brought on itself, in the form of Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe’s contention that those who think anthropogenic climate change is a reality are disrespecting God. Which is, again, not the kind of talk the GOP establishment wants to hear during this current, boring-is-best rebrand. ”

But 38% is close enough ...

Nasa climate scientists: We said 2014 was the warmest year on record... but we're only 38% sure we were right  cuzzin ricky Evidently, Yes

More Body Count

Please Sir, May I Have Another Climate change supporters suffer losses Despite millions spent to make climate change a wedge issue during the midterms, environmentally friendly candidates didn’t fare well on Election Day. Green groups funneled an unprecedented amount of money into top Senate races that determined control of the upper chamber but fell short. The nation’s top environmental groups including the League of Conservation Voters, the Sierra Club, the Environmental Defense Fund, the Natural Resources Defense Council, and billionaire Tom Steyer’s NextGen Climate spent at least $85 million on six Senate races. Out of those six races, only two candidates willing to take action on climate change won their races. Second Amendment Crushes Gun Control Candidates in Midterm Elections As the election returns came in on November 4 one thing was evident—the Second Amendment crushed gun control candidates in Senate and gubernatorial races around the country. In so doing, the Second Amendment annihilated the left's relentless claim that 90 percent of Americans support more gun control. Hollywood Reeling from Bitter Election Defeats... Tennis Channel chief Ken Solomon said he and his fellow Hollywood fundraisers realized in recent weeks that their candidates were in trouble. As Barbra Streisand sent out a donation plea to Democratic fundraisers across the country, industry politicos began to prepare themselves for a losing battle. "It was the worst election map since Eisenhower," Solomon said. "We all put on our body armor and were waiting for this explosion. Now we just need to move forward." via Drudge

South Florida wants what?

Staggeringly Stupid People

“ South Florida Wants to Be the 51st State Because of Climate Change Worries The Everglades are in danger of drowning! [...] Harris has a particular bone to pick with Republican Gov. Rick Scott, who he says won't pay attention to Floridians' concerns about the climate. "This is a reality, even though our present governor doesn't think so," Harris says. "Other than the governor of this state, it's an issue that everyone recognizes." Scott is currently in a tight, ugly race against former Republican Gov. Charlie Crist, who is now running as a Democrat. Reached for comment, the governor's spokesman pointed to an comment Scott made at a gubernatorial debate Tuesday night. Although Scott refuses to acknowledge that climate change is man-made, he said that he spent $350 million to address sea-level rise in the Miami area, and mentioned other large spending packages aimed at protecting Florida's coral reefs and springs. Scott's office did not comment on southern Florida's moves toward independence. [Full Nonsense, via Helly] While it's not only possible that Florida can disappear under the sea, it's likely inevitable as witness 4 billion years of mother nature rearranging her furniture, so to speak.  And, anybody who thinks a vote for Charlie Crist can make a difference is either certifiable, or a godless Progressive asshat. In either case, staggeringly stupid. ”

Robert "Snoozy" Hunziker pulls the Koch pin

and other goofy bastards                          Is America’s radical, underground climate change countermovement threatening the nation’s pivotal national interests? Is this debatable? Or, is their behavior prima facie evidence of a radical terrorist threat? -Robert "Snoozy" Hunziker

“ A progressive's case for climate change, a.k.a. bunch of made-up shit " .... one has to wonder how the future will play out, assuming America’s radical, underground climate change countermovement prevails, especially considering how they bully Congress, blocking any semblance of a national renewable energy policy.  After all, in their eyes: The “visual pollution” of wind turbines and solar panels lowers property values! But, this story is much deeper than the selfish interests and infamy of the Kochs and much deeper than what appears on surface. For example, the climate deniers are so paranoid that they go so far as to intimidate scientific journals that publish relatively innocuous articles vis a vis their countermovement, and on occasion, successfully, by way of threatening legal action, they cause retractions of peer-review scientific papers that they find offensive. This is symptomatic of a paranoia-plus personality type, very similar to the mentality of terrorists cell members found throughout Al-Qaeda’s network. It’s not new news that a well-funded effort to destroy the sanctity of scientific evidence of climate change has persisted in America for many, many years. It is out in the open and written about in countless articles, the Koch brothers and too many others to name, highjack the news and plant stories wherever and whenever possible, all funded by deep pocket billionaires. It’s a blatant right-wing sell-out of everything democracy ever stood for. And, it’s remarkable that everybody knows all about it! It’s absolutely remarkable, but caution is in order because it’s the unknowns behind their intentions that’s most threatening.  (Oh, there's more) I've been 30+ years following climate alarmists.  It's T.O.E. may generally be described as  (1)Communists, (2) True Believers, and (3) Lo Info's who tend to be students, or college dropouts.  Since Hunziker (MA, economic history, DePaul University) is a noted fellow of the Progressive (Communist) coalition, I'd say he's one of the mule drivers.  What I find interesting here, is the introduction of the Koch Brothers as the new (to me anyway) bogey-men responsible for ... what?  All the (too many to count) exposes that haunt these so called "Climate Sciencers?"  I'm guessing they're trying to transfer results from their long-running Koch smear campaign to help the ailing climate science grab. If Hunziker wants honest debate,  start here.  If you can win a debate there, you'll have my attention.  As it is, I can find no reference of his ever challenging the Watt's guys.

Euros Wise Up

Global Warming Fade-Out Europe to Ditch Climate Protection Goals “ Keister Island Europe Come To Their Senses. The EU's reputation as a model of environmental responsibility may soon be history. The European Commission wants to forgo ambitious climate protection goals and pave the way for fracking -- jeopardizing Germany's touted energy revolution in the process. The climate between Brussels and Berlin is polluted, something European Commission officials attribute, among other things, to the "reckless" way German Chancellor Angela Merkel blocked stricter exhaust emissions during her re-election campaign to placate domestic automotive manufacturers like Daimler and BMW. This kind of blatant self-interest, officials complained at the time, is poisoning the climate. But now it seems that the climate is no longer of much importance to the European Commission, the EU's executive branch, either. Commission sources have long been hinting that the body intends to move away from ambitious climate protection goals. On Tuesday, the Süddeutsche Zeitung reported as much. At the request of Commission President José Manuel Barroso, EU member states are no longer to receive specific guidelines for the development of renewable. The stated aim of increasing the share of green energy across the EU to up to 27 percent will hold. But how seriously countries tackle this project will no longer be regulated within the plan. As of 2020 at the latest -- when the current commitment to further increase the share of green energy expires -- climate protection in the EU will apparently be pursued on a voluntary basis. [Full] So let me get this straight.  The EU, having finally decided that "Climate Protection" is so much frippery, will nonetheless continue the assault on their economies with the "green commitment for six more years?  And, will green-twat Obama exercise the power of his  magisterial pen and  declare war on  Brussels; a nation he may feel he can beat; and one certainly populated by pale white people?  All this is rhetorical since I really don't care what Euros do.  Now that we have our own National Socialist government, will any of them come to our aid?  I don't think so; we're on our own. PS - I haven't made my mind up on fracking, but I lean toward seeing a problem with it.  I'll let you know if I wake up to find myself living at 90.0000° N, 0.0000° W one morning. Thanks to What's his name - Damien.  I'm having an Alzheimers moment. Skoonj! ”