Showing posts with label Corrupt Government. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Corrupt Government. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 24, 2018

FISA Surveillance









FISA Surveillance Shows Abuse of Power 'Far Worse Than Watergate'


"I wish people would stop saying 'worse than Watergate.' Watergate was literally pissing in the sink compared to the abuses that have happened since." - Meritorious video site comment



Of all the  uncompromised (yes, there are some)  journalists out there, few have unearthed more root news re: criminal activity by the Obama/Clinton machine than Sean Hannity.  And I include the still unexplained Seth Rich murder.

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Corruptocrat Taken to Woodshed



 






Senator Bob Menendez’s corruption trial starts in a couple of weeks, and his legal team has requested that this particular potential swamp draining be put on hold on certain days so Menendez can attend Senate votes. The response from federal prosecutors is a solid gold old-school ass kicking. Here’s a portion (via Phil Kerpen): <snip>

This Court has consistently recognized that defendant Menendez is not entitled to special treatment because of his status. It should maintain that principle here. This Court has already denied the request that defendant Menendez advances here. Specifically, this Court ruled that “with regard to adjourning the case, no, I am not going to adjourn the case. If the Senator wishes to absent himself at times for purposes of vote, that is his prerogative and I have no problem with that.” Aug. 22, 2017, Tr. at 15-16. This Court remarked, “I think that’s a very practical resolution of your concerns.”<snip>


Alternate headline: Area Corruptocrat Taken to Woodshed.

Even if Menendez is convicted of corruption he could remain in the Senate for some time, because hey, we’re talking about Congress. It should also be noted that the Democrats have a great interest in dragging this out as long as possible, because if Menendez were to leave the Senate, the N.J. governor would pick his replacement, and the Left’s hoping the next governor will be a Democrat.


This story is a few days old, but it just tickled the crap out of me.

Saturday, July 29, 2017

...investigate the actions of James Comey, Loretta Lynch, the Clinton email ...




 






Knock Knock
Who's There?

Opportunity


"Attorney General Jeff Sessions was handed two important lifelines by the Senate and House Judiciary Committee's respectively in the last two days.

"On the Senate side, Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley made it clear that there would not be room on the calendar for consideration of a replacement for General Sessions until 2018, a direct message to the President that he might go a full year without an AG if he acts against Sessions.

"On the House side, things got really interesting as the House Judiciary Committee majority issued a letter to Sessions urging the appointment of a second special counsel to investigate the actions of James Comey, Loretta Lynch, the Clinton email scandal, as well as the unmasking of Trump campaign officials in what appears to have been the political use of our nation's intelligence resources.

"As a strong supporter of Attorney General Sessions, I strongly urge him to accept the House Judiciary Committee's recommendation and appoint a second special prosecutor to investigate the gross malfeasance that occurred during the Obama Administration. America needs to know, once and for all, if our nation's intelligence services were commandeered for political purposes and whether Hillary Clinton's offsite housing and subsequent destruction of more than 30,000 emails constituted a criminal act.  [FULL]

Tuesday, June 27, 2017

Sheriff Joe v. Rat Bastards


Obama's  Mustache                           






Sheriff Joe, Unlike the Obama Cartel,
is backed by the Constitution so wtf?
There are only two Law Enforcement officers in America; The County Sheriff and the US Marshal.

A common complaint from Sheriffs is, “I cannot arrest a judge without first getting the prosecutor to agree otherwise the prosecutor may refuse to prosecute.” The question that begs answering is where did the prosecutor get such power? Certainly We the People did not give it to them in the Constitution and certainly congress can make no Law that we did not give them the power to make. We the People did not ordain the prosecutor “Chief Law Enforcer”, but the Sheriff! Solution: if the prosecutor refuses to prosecute they should be arrested for “felony rescue”.



The Sheriff and the U.S. Marshal just like We the People have lost their way. We have forgotten who we are and by what authority we act upon and therefore our servants rule over us.

There are only two Law Enforcement officers in America; The County Sheriff and the US Marshal. The sheriff is the only elected law enforcer whose duty it is to protect the unalienable rights of the People both in the court room and within the county. While the U.S. Marshal is responsible for protecting the unalienable rights of the People in the Federal Court room.

The Sheriff is the only person able to call for the posse comitatus (Latin, Power of the county) Referred at Common Law to all males over the age of fifteen on whom a sheriff could call for assistance in preventing any type of civil disorder. Today, under a national emergency the Sheriff is both the first and last line of defense should our government go rouge; since congress has been derelict of duty in the providing for the militia.

The Sheriff and the U.S. Marshal just like We the People have lost their way. We have forgotten who we are and by what authority we act upon and therefore our servants rule over us.
There are forces within our government that are doing everything they can to prevent that from happening.
U.S. Constitution Article I Section 8 clauses 15 and 16: "The Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"

U.S. Constitution Article I Section 8 clauses 15 and 16: "The Congress shall have power to provide for calling forth the militia to execute the laws of the union, suppress insurrections and repel invasions; To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United States, reserving to the states respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training the militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"

The Bill of Rights makes clear two (2) things (1) A well regulated militia is an unalienable right and (2) a well regulated militia is necessary to our security.

Amendment II "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Today all seats of government have unlawfully incorporated and therefore all police forces (city, town, village, state, etc.) work for corporations and owe their allegiance to the corporation, therein “code enforcement officers”; whereas Sheriffs and Marshals are “constitutional officers” owing allegiance to the People. There exists no Constitutional authority for police forces.

U.S. Constitution Article VI clause 2: "This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding."

The Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights are founded under common law, a/k/a the Supreme Law of the Land. ALL CASES AT LAW: Black's Law 4th, "within constitutional guaranty of jury trial, refers to common law actions as distinguished from causes in equity and certain other proceedings." Breimhorst v. Beck-man, 227 Minn. 409, 35 N.W.2d 719, 734.

The Sheriff and the U.S. Marshal just like We the People have lost their way. We have forgotten who we are and by what authority we act upon and therefore our servants rule over us. The purpose of this site is to help us find our way back to the Liberties our founding fathers discovered and pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor to establish for themselves and their posterity. It is now our turn, our duty, to re-discover our roots for ourselves and our posterity. There are forces within our government that are doing everything they can to prevent that from happening. These people are called progressives and over the years they have taken control of both major parties and thereby methodically removed civics, God and constitutional studies from our education and through the media, entertainment and education have demoralized us.

What We the People and our Sheriffs need to know is that:

"We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America." Preamble to the U.S. Constitution.

When we the People ordained Common Law, U.S. Constitution Article VI, the Supreme Law of the Land We the People took control of all decision making within the courts through Grand and Trial Juries and the Common Law Sheriff became the only Law Enforcer of the court and the county. The common law court is well established and defined in history, Blacks Law and Bouviers Law.

“The Sheriff is the “Chief Executive and Administrative Officer” of a county chosen by popular election. His principal duties are in aid of the criminal and civil courts of record [common law courts]; such as serving process, summoning juries, executing judgments, holding judicial sales and the like. He is also the chief conservator of the peace within his territorial jurisdiction.” Harston v. Langston, Tex.Civ. App., 292 S.W. 648, 650.

The word "Sheriff" is a contraction of the term "shire reeve", meaning a royal official responsible for keeping the peace throughout a shire or county on behalf of the king(s). We the People “Ordained” the Constitution for the United States of America which puts the People as the said kings above the Constitution and our elected servants under the Constitution, therein the great American experiment. Our servants have no more power than that which We the People gave them and any law they write to the contrary is null and void as if it has never been passed; as we read:

"All laws, rules and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." Marbury v. Madison, 5th US (2 Cranch) 137, 180

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them." Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 491

<SNIP>

A common complaint from Sheriffs is, “I cannot arrest a judge without first getting the prosecutor to agree otherwise the prosecutor may refuse to prosecute.” The question that begs answering is where did the prosecutor get such power? Certainly We the People did not give it to them in the Constitution and certainly congress can make no Law that we did not give them the power to make. We the People did not ordain the prosecutor “Chief Law Enforcer”, but the Sheriff! Solution: if the prosecutor refuses to prosecute they should be arrested for “felony rescue”.

The Sheriff is not to go begging the prosecutor for an indictment, he shouldn’t even be going to the prosecutor at all, but to the Grand Jury directly and ask them for an indictment. The problem is that the Judge and the prosecutor deny Sheriffs and the People access to the Grand Jury. After six years of practicing law without a BAR degree we found out that many judges and prosecutors have something to hide so they protect each other by blocking access to the Grand Jury, they fear what you may ask of the Grand Jury.

So, if the Sheriff needs to ask permission, he’s not the Chief and he passes his duties to others, and any Sheriff that does that is in “Bad Behavior”. If the Sheriff cannot get access to the Jury Administrators (a/k/a Commissioners of Jurors) directly he has the power and authority to summons 25 People, out of any pool (phone book, etc.) to the courthouse jury room and ask for an indictment.

We the People did not give prosecutors power to negotiate deals with People under indictment. Prosecutors may propose the deal to the Grand Jury for decision; but the arrangement must offer a plan for restitution acceptable to the injured party or due process, trial by jury, must run its course. "The Full Deck"

TODAY


WASHINGTON, D.C. – After failing to clean the DOJ swamp of attorneys still loyal to President Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Attorney General Jeff Sessions and President Trump are standing silent as former Sheriff Joe Arpaio begins a criminal trial in Maricopa County, Arizona, that could send the 85-year-old famed law enforcement officer to prison for contempt of court.

I cannot begin to understand  how this happening. In a nutshell, Obama's DOJ  (Eric Holder) fired the first shot in the plan to defy United States immigration  law by flooding AZ with new voters illegal aliens from Mexico. Sherriff Joe said "no way Jose."  In March 2009, Holder's DOJ notified Arpaio that they were investigating him for civil rights violations, in unfairly targeting Hispanics and Spanish-speaking people , and subequently found "reasonable cause to believe that MCSO engages in a pattern or practice of violating the Constitution and laws of the United States" 

 In 2013, U.S. District Court Judge Murray Snow ruled in a civil lawsuit in which a number of Hispanic individuals represented by the ACLU alleged racial profiling by the Sheriff's Office. Among other remedies, Judge Snow appointed a court monitor to oversee compliance with his orders that included video cameras in every police car, and training of staff. Further controversy erupted when department training videos surfaced in which Judge Snow's orders were trivialized, so now 
Arpaio faces a bench trial before  U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton – a federal judge appointed by President Clinton.

Which is  WHY TRUMP WHITE HOUSE AND SESSIONS DOJ MUST HELP SHERIFF ARPAIO

Monday, April 03, 2017

Vault of Horrors, But Who Cares





Wikileaks dump on the CIA: Vault 7




Friday, November 04, 2016

Going After Loretta

Loretta's Mustache                           







“Just think of the FBI as the Vietcong.
Agents within the Federal Bureau of Investigation want to take down the personnel at the top of the Justice Department, according to a former D.C. based U.S. Justice attorney.

“Just think of the FBI as the Vietcong. That’s what they are. They are digging tunnels under the Justice Department. They are going to sink that place,” Washington attorney Joe DiGenova told The Daily Caller Thursday.

DiGenova, who has bureau sources close to the FBI investigation, named Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, Assistant Attorney General Peter Kaznick, Assistant Attorney General John P. Carlin, and Assistant Attorney General Leslie Caldwell as senior level staff at DOJ have who have “done something that they are going to regret.”

FBI agents pushed forward, against the wishes of the Justice Department and without the support of bureau leadership, to investigate the Clinton Foundation, according to a Wall Street Journal report.

Read more:

Wow, Actual Justice?

Monday, October 31, 2016

Loretta's Fraud

Loretta's Mustache                           





I've previously opined that Obama's engineered election in 2008 means government has already been overthrown.  So, was I wrong? What's happening now seals the deal, IMO.   Clinonistas will/are claiming Comey's action may cost her the election.  That's crap.

Harry  Reid says FBI chief may have violated law by disclosing review .  

Nice try Harry, but no cigar. The public perception of the FBI's mandate was born by years of  J. Edgar's fight against the  "communist menace."  These scandals show just how serious are the Left's attempts to undermine our democracy; so same difference. Too late to spin.

One other note.  Like most of you I visit Drudge at least once a day, and it seems to me that every day, for the last 3-4 months, I've seen this.  "HILLARY LEAD DOWN TO +1"

Pul-eeeze.

One other note.  The House should  convene immediately and start impeachment proceedings against Loretta Lynch.

Thursday, October 13, 2016

The survey says ....





In addition to the set of fears examined in previous waves, the survey team took a closer look at two fear related phenomena: Americans’ beliefs in conspiracy theories and fear of Muslims, sometimes referred to as “Islamophobia.”

The greatest fear however was "President Hillary."  That wasn't actually recorded, but trust me.

Thursday, September 29, 2016

Loretta Lynch, of Course

Hey There!

Friday, September 16, 2016

How corrupt are they?


Hey There!

Tuesday, September 06, 2016

Never mind everything ...





                                           






The FBI interviewed Hillary for 3.5 hours on July 2 at its headquarters in DC. Three days later, Comey announced his shocking decision, despite listing all the ways Clinton and her aides were careless with classified materials on her private email server. For example, she had NO IDEA how to classify information. .. [FULL]
Never mind.  At this point it's undeniable.  She's a liar.  She's incompetent. She has a brain implant that's keeping her alive and animated, just enough, to get her enough votes via early voting by e-mail ballots to wrap up a victory by the end of September,  at which point her campaign will announce that she is so pissed-off by negative campaigning that she has decided to remain in seclusion until her inauguration ( which will be be broadcast from her bunker because of threats by Donald Trump to strafe the event using his personal B-2 bomber).  Everyone knows this is true.

Aside: I am in fact convinced that the "combine" are determined to disrupt this election by setting predicates (e.g.U.S. investigating potential covert Russian plan to disrupt November elections -WaPo)  for an election nullification.  Is it because I have zero faith in the integrity of our election process?  Damn tootin'.

Monday, August 29, 2016

Call it "Hubris"







                                                                                       










PHOENIX (AP) - The investigation and possible prosecution of metropolitan Phoenix Sheriff Joe Arpaio will be handled by the U.S. Justice Department after federal prosecutors in Arizona asked to be removed because of unspecified conflicts of interest, according to a court filing made public.

The U.S. Attorney's Office for Arizona said in its brief filing Friday in U.S. District Court in Phoenix that the case has been assigned to the Justice Department's criminal division, public integrity section.

The filing cited "existing conflicts of interest or the appearance of conflicts of interest pertaining to the matter" for Arizona's federal prosecutors, but it did not provide details.

Snow also said there was probable cause to believe Arpaio intentionally failed to turn over records that he had promised, under oath, to give to a court official.
Mel McDonald, an attorney for Arpaio, said he was disappointed by the decision.

"It's their call," McDonald said. "If they have a conflict ... I'm not one to second-guess that decision."

U.S. District Judge Murray Snow ruled last Friday that another judge should decide if Arpaio and others should be held in criminal contempt-of-court for ignoring court orders in a racial profiling case. Snow also said there was probable cause to believe Arpaio intentionally failed to turn over records that he had promised, under oath, to give to a court official.

The records were from a secret investigation that Arpaio's foes say focused on Snow in an attempt to discredit him.

Arpaio, a Republican who is running for a seventh term this year, has vigorously insisted that he didn't investigate Snow and instead said the probe was focused on widespread identity theft.  [More, if you can stand it]

  Like in a Greek play, Obama's DOJ is the crane with cable that lets him drop into and resolve any  political problem in a flash.  My contempt for this — this, call it  brigandage,  is boundless.  In my play, Sheriff Joe will be President Trump's Attorney General.

Wednesday, July 06, 2016

Mashup of Hillary’s Lies


 




 Mashup of Hillary’s Lies vs. Comey’s Press Conference
Hilary is a cnut




Looks like the Trump campaign just got handed the best ad ever.

HT John Hinderaker. Follow him on Twitter: @jhinderaker
Via Powerline.

Leave it to the good (and quick) people at Reason TV to mashup Hillary’s claims about her email use and the FBI’s findings….

(Tammy Bruce)



ASIDE: It Looks like FBI chief 'Homey' (confirmed by the Senate on Monday, with only Rand Paul dissenting) will set the record for shortest term ever after Trumps inauguration.

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

We have met the enemy, and...

101 Years Ago ... No Change


Friday, September 04, 2015

SCOTUS-OGARKY







                                                                                       
'GARKYS


When five largely unrepresentative and unaccountable people can decide to impose their moral values on a nation of 320 million, we really are not a nation of laws, but a nation of men.

When clerks in Washington, D.C. can deny citizens access to guns, despite there being an individual, constitutional right, we really are not a nation of laws, but a nation of men.

When Barack Obama can ignore court rulings and bypass Congress on a whim and be cheered for doing so, we really are not a nation of laws, but a nation of men.

When mayors and other leaders can be cheered for ignoring the marriage laws of the nation and issue same sex marriage licenses at a time doing so is prohibited by state law, we really are not a nation of laws, but a nation of men.

When jurors lie to get on death penalty cases to ensure the death penalty cannot be issues and they are heroes for doing so, we really are not a nation of laws, but a nation of men.

So when Kim Davis refuses to issue marriage licenses, she’s just behaving as all the others have done. Only she’s the bad guy because the secular loud voices of the country disagree with her ignoring the law.

But again, we are nation of men, not a nation of laws.

Anthony Kennedy decided to insert his will and morality into the discussion and shut up everyone else. He thought he could shut down the conversation. He only made it angrier.

We are not a democracy, but an oligarchy. And we are not a nation of laws. The republic may continue, but without the moral leadership necessary to bind the leaders and citizens to the same laws. [RED STATE]

The Roman Empire lasted  approximately 500 years.  You would think that had Roman citizens had  an internet with 24/7 news about how corrupt the system had become that they'd ... nah.  They'd be just like us; erm, were just like us.

Monday, February 09, 2015

Loretta Lynch Holder Jr.

Holder's Mustache                           











“
WHISTLEBLOWER: AG NOMINEE IN $1 BILLION OBAMA COVER-UP
Loretta Lynch played role in scandal leading back to White House


OTAY!

NEW YORK – New revelations are emerging that could implicate Loretta Lynch, President Obama’s attorney general nominee, in the world’s largest banking scandal.

HSBC also used its power to temporarily shut down WND.com as the news site was breaking a series of stories on the mega-bank’s money-laundering practices.
As WND reported, Lynch, as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, oversaw the investigation in 2012 of drug-related international money laundering allegations against London-based HSBC Holdings LLC.

As a result of HSBC agreeing to a settlement requiring the international bank holding company to pay the U.S. government more than $1.2 billion in fines for money laundering, Lynch’s office agreed in return not to press criminal charges against any bank employee of the U.S.-based HSBC subsidiary.

The federal government’s unwillingness to prosecute HSBC was exposed by a former HSBC vice president and relationship manager in New York, John Cruz, who called the bank a “criminal enterprise.” Cruz was ignored by law enforcement authorities until he brought to WND 1,000 pages of customer account records that document his claims.

HSBC also used its power to temporarily shut down WND.com as the news site was breaking a series of stories on the mega-bank’s money-laundering practices.

[...]

Lynch has never explained why the New York U.S. Attorney’s Office in 2012 chose to ignore the 1,000 pages of customer account records Cruz pulled from the HSBC computer system before he was fired by HSBC senior management uninterested in investigating his claim to have discovered illegal money-laundering activity at the bank.

“The official response of the IRS Whistleblower Office doesn’t say there was no fraud or tax evasion committed by HSBC in the money-laundering case,” Cruz explained. “The IRS simply says, ‘In this case, the information you provided did not result in the collection of any proceeds.’”

Cruz began working at HSBC on Jan. 14, 2008, and was terminated for “poor job performance” on Feb. 17, 2010. [Full]



I'm aware that some here discount WND as an unreliable source.  I believe that goes back to their almost single handed coverage of Obama's birth certificate scandal, where they were sandbagged, in my opinion, a few times by false accounts that I believe were put into play by pro-Obamas.  Nevertheless, WND is the closest thing this nation has to novelist Émile Zola who, alone among France's media, went after the truth in the Dreyfus affair. WND is a national treasure.

”


Wednesday, January 28, 2015

Loretta Lynch's Mustache


"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell." TRKOF
Attorney General Nominee to Say She Wants Better Relations With Congress