Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hillary. Show all posts

Thursday, June 28, 2018

Oh my. Arrest her.

IG Report: Hillary Clinton Has Committed 'Sexual Crimes Against Children' Inspector General's report reveals horrific crimes committed by Clintons and Foundation
Read more at: http://www.neonnettle.com/news/4310-ig-report-hillary-clinton-has-committed-sexual-crimes-against-children
© Neon Nettle

Monday, April 24, 2017

Heavy Seize Ahead





                                           





A New York Times report on Saturday claimed that FBI Director James Comey decided to reveal that he was re-opening the investigation into Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton because he suspected Attorney General Loretta Lynch was covering up for her — and because an email found by Russian hackers seemed to support those suspicions.

Now, according to the Times, another hacked document, purportedly stolen by Russians, may have revealed collusion between the former Attorney General and the Democrats to ensure Hillary Clinton’s victory in the general election.



Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton because he suspected Attorney General Loretta Lynch was covering up for her — and because an email found by Russian hackers seemed to support those suspicions.

The Times’ investigative report suggests that a U.S. intelligence agency managed to intercept some of what Russian hackers were stealing — and that one document, “described as both a memo and an email, was written by a Democratic operative who expressed confidence that Ms. Lynch would keep the Clinton investigation from going too far.”

Now, according to the Times, another hacked document, purportedly stolen by Russians, may have revealed collusion between the former Attorney General and the Democrats to ensure Hillary Clinton’s victory in the general election.
According to the Times, Comey feared that Lynch — who had insisted the Clinton probe be referred to as a “matter” and not as an “investigation,” and who suggested it the investigation was not criminal when, in fact, it was — would declare the case closed, and then Russian hackers would leak the document to undermine the FBI’s image of independence.

The Times notes: “Mr. Comey’s defenders regard this as one of the untold stories of the Clinton investigation, one they say helps explain his decision-making.” And if a local news reporter in Phoenix had not caught Lynch meeting with former President Bill Clinton, she might have succeeded in sheltering the Clintons even more effectively than she had.

When Comey’s letter to Congress about the re-opening of the investigation was revealed on October 28, it changed the contours of the presidential race — arguably by uniting reluctant conservatives around Donald Trump’s candidacy. [FULL]


Thank you Skoonj!

Monday, October 31, 2016

"HALLO WEINER"





                                           





WHAT THE "HALLO WEINER"
skoonj
"And he would have known if any of those e-mails were incriminating to Hillary and Huma."



This is a compilation of notes I've been posting around the net concerning the re-opened Clinton investigation by the FBI.

We need to consider two factors if the Weiner theory holds up, and they go to his motivation. First, Huma is a tool of the Muslim Brotherhood. She has an assignment here, and has been accomplishing it very well.

1)We need to consider two factors if the Weiner theory holds up, and they go to his motivation. First, Huma is a tool of the Muslim Brotherhood. She has an assignment here, and has been accomplishing it very well.
2) Weiner is a Jew. He finally realized that for a good looking (as she once was) tool of Muslim Brotherhood to marry a hated Jew, she must have done it as part of her assignment.
Second, Weiner is a Jew. He finally realized that for a good looking (as she once was) tool of Muslim Brotherhood to marry a hated Jew, she must have done it as part of her assignment.

Everyone was asking why, after all the embarrassment in the past, Anthony Weiner would risk more behavior like sexting and posting genitalia photos he sent to underage girls. The answer may never be known, but he could have been so angry at Hillary and Huma that he decided to do in both of them. He knew that if he was investigated for a federal crime, his phone and computer would be seen, along with any Huma and Hillary e-mails on them. And he would have known if any of those e-mails were incriminating to Hillary and Huma. Had he just turned the e-mails over to the cops or FBI, he knew they would disappear and his life would be in jeopardy. But this way, those e-mails seem like collateral damage. What they are is planned revenge by Anthony Weiner.

We need to consider two factors if the Weiner theory holds up, and they go to his motivation. First, Huma is a tool of the Muslim Brotherhood. She has an assignment here, and has been accomplishing it very well.

Second, Weiner is a Jew. He finally realized that for a good looking (as she once was) tool of Muslim Brotherhood to marry a hated Jew, she must have done it as part of her assignment.

No matter what else Weiner has felt, he has been supremely embarrassed after thinking through the implications. Further, his hatred of Huma, the enemy agent who used him, must now be utmost in his mind. He has done something that will destroy Huma as an enemy tool, and with her, Attila The Hen.
One of the things we may never know is whether there are any e-mails between Huma Abedin and her Muslim Brotherhood controllers. If so, that could put a whole new wrinkle into this case, though it might be kept quiet.

There might be something there, since a lot depends on how stupid Huma thinks Weiner is. That may be pretty stupid, since there are said to be tens of thousands of e-mails pertaining to the Clinton case. She may have simply felt that he was so stupid that he wouldn't open the cache himself, nor stumble on any password or other protection. Will the FBI tell us if there is something like that in the e-mails? I'm not sure.

Huma is said to be in hiding since this broke. Indeed. And if there is serious communication between her and the Muslim Brotherhood of a mission-oriented character, she may well be getting ready to flee the country.

OK, now here's a question. We know Comey wasn't willing to stand up to AG/DOJ, Lynch. Now he comes out with another investigation that presumably would go through her to prosecute. What has changed? Has she given her OK? Is this a ruse to suck in Republicans? Has he decided to run out the clock till 20JAN, when Lynch leaves office but he remains at the FBI?

skoonj

Very good questions skoonger.  What adds a bit of credence to yours,  is "Vice President Biden calls James Comey ‘a straight guy,’ despite being a Republican. Tells CNN’s Michael Smerconish the FBI director will be fair in the Clinton email investigation"

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Trump DUET


Hilarious!

Monday, September 26, 2016

The Big Yawn ...



 
           People are always asking. "Say, Rodge .. 

.
FWIW, Mother Superior (MoSup) has some renown in her circle for ability to diagnose medical stuff.  A few weeks ago she offered that Hillary's problem is consistent with Myasthenia gravis with Narcolepsy. 


If so, she is absolutely disqualified for, not just the presidency, but  driving a car!  That, on top of her other pathologies ... Ahem.  BTW, it would seem certain that her physicians are aware of this, and patient confidentially be damned, ought be ringing alarm bells.

Wednesday, August 03, 2016

...getting your political news from The New York Times








.




NY Times Public Editor (dumbed-down name for an ombudsman) Calls Out The Paper Over Hillary Clinton Cover-Up

As the general election unfolds, it’s essential that whatever doubts linger about the candidates, these voters believe that The Times will give them the information they need to answer those questions. [and they haven't] -Liz Spayd, Public Editor, NYT



Hillary Clinton, in a rare interview on Fox News last Sunday, claimed that the F.B.I. director, James B. Comey Jr., had called her statements about her private email servers “truthful” and said she has been consistent with the American people in her accounts about the controversy. As it turns out, Clinton’s contentions in the interview were misleading, bordering on false.

The New York Times is just one outlet, but this is going on across the media landscape. Hillary is getting away with murder while Donald Trump gets raked over the coals for stupid stuff like the Khan spat and jokes about Russian espionage. Credit where credit is due: It’s good that this even appeared in the Times, but shame on them for allegedly trying to bury it by not sharing it on their social accounts.
If you’re getting all your political news from The New York Times, this may be the first time you’re hearing this. Clinton’s remarks were covered by several major news organizations, several of which pointedly challenged the Democratic nominee’s candor. But nothing on the interview ever appeared in The Times, either online or in print.

In the Fox appearance, Clinton was asked by Chris Wallace, the anchor, about previous statements she’s made when questioned on the email controversy, while he played tapes of her past remarks to the public.

“After a long investigation, F.B.I. Director James Comey said none of those things that you told the American public were true,” Wallace said.

Clinton pushed back. “Director Comey said my answers were truthful, and what I’ve said is consistent with what I have told the American people: that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails,” she said.

The Washington Post, NPR, NBC News and PolitiFact all challenged Clinton’s claims, saying they appeared to be based on a selective and misleading interpretation of Comey’s remarks. The Post warded her “Four Pinocchios,” the worst truth-telling rating it gives, for statements it classifies as “Whoppers.”…

I asked Carolyn Ryan, The Times’s political editor, about the decision not to cover Clinton’s remarks about the email controversy. Here’s how she responded: “It is a subject we have covered aggressively — especially how her comments compare to what the F.B.I. found — and will continue to do so.”…  [Full report]

La-La--La-La-La-La-La-La-La-La ....

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

When you wish upon a star ....

Res Ipsa Loquitur 




Ron Metzger

5:14 PM (14 hours ago)

When your favorite dreams come true:
Only problem is that Peloosey isn’t in there with ‘em.

And Lynch.

And Boxer.


Unplugged
ROLLOVER

Sorry Ron; Boxer never laughs

Monday, July 25, 2016

MEDIA JOB #1



MSNBC ALL-STARS
and ilk






Media Job #1
Protect Hillary from #DNCLeak fallout


The Wikileaks release of hacked Democratic National Committee emails threatens to set the Democratic National Convention on fire this week.

Whether the leaks prove the election was fixed is one thing; that it is perceived that way is beyond doubt. Already Debbie Wasserman Schultz has resigned as DNC Chair.

Not enough.

Bernie supporters are furious, and are demanding he withdraw his endorsement of Hillary. That’s highly unlikely to happen, which will shut close a possible relief valve.

The left wing of the left wing of the Democratic Party is ready to bust a gasket, and go full #NeverHillary and mean it. It will only take a few percent of Democrats to stay home or run to Green Party candidate Jill Stein for Hillary to be damaged in the general election.

The media cannot let that happen. So expect several narratives to permeate the convention coverage.


The first and easiest narrative of the DNC leak will be that Hillary had nothing to do with the anti-Bernie shenanigans, she didn’t know about it, and she can’t be blamed. But that will not be enough.

So the media will have to portray Hillary as the real victim of the DNC leak, just like she’s the victim of her home server scandal and every other scandal that has tainted her career.  “Hillary as victim” is a time tested remedy which has worked so many times in the past. [FULL In-sur-rec-tion]

In other words, buisness as _ _ _ _ _ . 

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Impeachment and other things


"If you're trying to change minds and influence people it's probably not a good idea to say that virtually all elected Democrats are liars, but what the hell." TRKOF
[...] Worse yet, Barack Obama has taken the position that he can rewrite any law he chooses, any way he chooses, for any reason he chooses. In other words, although Obama is not a dictator, he IS CLAIMING THE RIGHT TO EXERCISE DICTATORIAL POWERS for himself. This is extraordinarily dangerous to our republic.

As Congressman Trey Gowdy has pointed out, if Obama claims he has the power to change Obamacare or illegal immigration law at his whim, why couldn't he do the same with election law? In other words, Obama has no more right to give illegal aliens work permits or delay congressionally mandated parts of Obamacare than he does to ban handguns by decree or reduce the number of electoral votes in Republican leaning states.

That's why it's so incredibly dangerous to allow Obama to be "above the law." It's because the abuses committed tomorrow by Obama or even future Presidents are likely to build upon the ones that we're allowing to go unchallenged today. [FULL]

John Hawkins touched all the bases in his 2014 Town Hall article. However, in 2016 the winds are blowing the other way, thank God.  I mean, did we ever think the Associated Press would print "8 YEARS AFTER HOPE AND CHANGE, VOTERS ARE ANGRY, ANXIOUS," about the 'Magic Negro?   NFW.  Impeachment?

Think about this.

  • Obama and his appointed cronies have good reason to worry that a Trump DOJ will look into myriad felony acts committed  over the last 8 years.
  • Despite the desperate attempts by media to show Hillary actually having a chance to beat Trump, The DNC know that holding the presidency is not possible (if Trump can stay alive long enough). 
  • But, it can be so much worse for Democrats.
  • A Reaganesque victory could cost the Dems historic losses in congress.
  • But, what if  ..
  • ... Obama was no longer the POTUS (two ways this can happen, one faster than the other)?
  • And Joe Biden was?
  • And President Biden instructed the DOJ to indict Hillary PDQ? And Joe Biden was tapped to replace her?
  • They might not beat Trump, but Dem voters, who would otherwise stay home, may decide to vote. Dem "Poll Workers" would then have a chance to work their magic in key races. 
I know thes people.

Thursday, July 14, 2016

Lynch-Hillary

Holder's Mustache                           







New York Post: FBI Agents Tell Us Lynch and Clinton Struck a Deal on That Plane
[...]
In an unusual move, FBI agents working the Hillary Clinton e-mail case had to sign a special form reminding them not to blab about the probe to anyone unless called to testify.

Sources said they had never heard of the “Case Briefing Acknowledgment” form being used before, although all agents must initially sign nondisclosure agreements to obtain security clearance.

“This is very, very unusual. I’ve never signed one, never circulated one to others,” said one retired FBI chief.

Meanwhile, FBI agents expressed their “disappointment” over FBI Director James Comey’s decision not to recommend charges against Clinton, sources close to the matter told The Post.

“FBI agents believe there was an inside deal put in place after the Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton tarmac meeting,” said one source.

Another source from the Justice Department was “furious” with Comey, saying he’s “managed to piss off right and left.” [FULL]

As Congress moves forward with impeachment of IRS CommissionerAhem.

Wednesday, July 06, 2016

Coup








Overthrowing the Government


Really sinking in now.  How monumental in our nation's history.  By letting Hillary Clinton walk, despite mountains of evidence, about mountains of illicit acts, the Obama administration have served us.  This in-your-face declaration, that they will do what they want when they want it, and are willing to take on any consequences is, in effect, the overthrow of the United States government. The Reichstag's burning.

Tuesday, July 05, 2016

Donald Trump's support


At least some are beginning to hedge their bets. The answer (not contained in the Daily Grind column) is puh-leeeeze.  The "progressive" media have, since ca. 1984, used their stranglehold on print and televised media to shape elections. They use their own  exit polling (like the infamous V.P.S.) to discourage  conservative voters.  They print rigged polling results.  They heap ridicule on anybody deemed too conservative. But this is a new ball game.

The "silent majority" that swept Reagan into office have always been there, but until now they haven't despised the nation's leadership enough to seethe.  And there's Trump's opponent, Hillary.  A poll just taken by a CBS news station in Virginia shows an astounding  82% want "Hillary Clinton criminally prosecuted."  I will not be the slightest surprised if, before her nomination, she "stars" in another of the myriad "strange deaths" that are a Clinton hallmark. Ahem.

Right now you can make book on President Trump.  What's up in the air is: will voters punish those in congress (every Dem and quite a few Republicans) that have marched in Obama's army of destruction?


Thursday, June 23, 2016

Ask Chelsea


On Point 

Damned good point

Sunday, June 12, 2016

When history bites you in the ass

Obama: "Hillary Clinton is a LIAR"


metzger hat dance

Thursday, June 09, 2016

Tweet Wars

This is Going to be Epic Fun


Monday, May 23, 2016

And that, my friends, tells you all you need to know









Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton Go Ice Fishing…



How do you settle a presidential election when the vote is too close to call?

With an ice fishing contest, of course!

After the first round of votes were counted, Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were deadlocked.

Instead of going through a recount, the two agreed to a week-long ice fishing contest to settle the election. Whoever caught the most fish at the end of the week would be the President.

The candidates decided a remote frozen lake in northern Wisconsin would be the ideal place. No observers on the fishing grounds, but both candidates would need to have their catches verified and counted each night at 5pm.

After Day 1, Trump returned with a total of 10 fish, Hillary came back with nothing.

Day 2 finished, and Trump caught another 20 fish, but Hillary once again came back with nothing!

That night, Hillary and her cronies got together and accused Trump of being a “low-life, cheatin’ son-of-a-gun.” Instead of fishing on Day 3, they were just going to follow Trump to spy on him and figure out how he was cheating.

Day 3 finished up and Trump had an incredible day, adding 50 fish to his total!

That night, Hillary and her democratic buddies got together for the full report on how Donald was cheating. Hillary stood up to give her report and said, “You are not going to believe this, he’s cutting holes in the ice!”

And that, my friends, tells you all you need to know about the intelligence on the left side of the aisle!
Angry Patriot via MoSup

Friday, May 20, 2016

I'm thinking Trump-Sanders

Today's Nostradamus

Hillary will not be the nominee

I'm seeing lots of talk from Dem insiders that super delegates are beginning to talk switching to undecided. The specter of 1968, only worse, has everyone spooked. Obama will give DOJ the okay to indict her, if necessary, which in itself will start a war of recrimination
Too bad the earth is going to flip n it's axis this year.

Thursday, May 12, 2016

Lydie Denier former fiancée ....


When asked by Malzberg if she believes Clinton is getting a pass, Denier noted that the Clintons are “very powerful.”
In her article, Denier provides an emotional account of the moment she learned her fiancé was murdered:
I was at home in Laguna Beach, California when Matt Lauer’s voice filled the air around me. I had barely had time for my first sip of morning coffee while sitting in bed watching the Today Show.

A chill ran through my body as I stared at the television, unable to absorb the information and the face I had just seen flash across the TV. The man pictured had blond-gray hair, blue eyes, and a big white grin I knew only too well. In disbelief I walked to the television screen to get a closer look at his photo, his name clearly visible underneath. I didn’t have my glasses on, but still the blindness that I felt was not normal, I was in shock. His photo was replaced by images of flames in the background.

Matt Lauer continued to report. “Reuters and AFP are reporting that the American ambassador to Libya, along with three other State Department workers have been killed in an attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi. A Greek contractor with the US Mission in Benghazi is telling NBC that he identified the body of Ambassador Chris Stevens in a Benghazi street earlier today.”

I wanted to run or to scream but I couldn’t. My knees were shaking and unable to move. I felt a sharp pain pierce my heart. My blurry vision was getting worse as I thought “Oh God, what is going on?” A wave of nausea washed over me but I sat, frozen to my spot on the bed, staring intently at the television screen.

“It couldn’t be him,” I tried to convince myself. “It has to be a mistake; it must be another Chris Stevens.”

Then his picture reappeared. I grabbed my glasses and now I could see without a doubt that there was no mistake; It was my Chris, my skinny chicken and he was gone… forever.

[Full & Video]

Rape Synop


Synopsis

Hillary knew what her husband was doing and yet, over and over again, she helped him cover it up and destroy the women, portraying them as stalkers, blackmailers and loons. As one of Bill's mistresses, former Miss Arkansas Sally Perdue, told the Daily Mail (U.K.), Hillary has a "vengeful, spiteful ugliness ... And she's championing women's causes?"

Under Hillry





Hillary Clinton laughed as the person introducing her omitted “under God” from the pledge of allegiance.

Wednesday, during a campaign rally at Camden County College in New Jersey, the woman said,

“Only Hillary can bring us together as one nation und, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.”

After the woman said “one nation,” she can be heard beginning to say under, but then caught herself.


The Daily Caller, through which I found this story, threw in this (Do you think 'under God' ought be admitted) poll. Generally speakingwhy bring it up, unless you want to revive an idea promulgated by professional atheists?  I'm just saying.