Showing posts with label John McCain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John McCain. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 05, 2018

McCain is Dead




*SPIT*                                








John McCain’s lack of character was further demonstrated when he voted not to repeal Obamacare.  He ran his 2016 Senatorial race under the banner he would lead the fight to repeal Obamacare!  But, he hates Donald Trump so very much .. 




[...] John McCain was a far more interesting, colorful and controversial man than most Americans and no journalists know.   If you saw the Sunday political shows you would think a saint had passed on.  John McCain was a man driven by two ghosts:  His father and grandfather.  Both were four-star Admirals in the US Navy so John’s appointment to the US Naval Academy was his destiny, but John McCain graduated 894th in his class of 899 students. He was known for being wild, chasing young women.  He was in a student group calling themselves “The Bad Bunch.”

John married Carol Shepp, a swimsuit model who had been married to one of his classmates with whom she had two children. She and McCain were parents of a daughter in that marriage.  At heart a playboy, John was soon bored with domestic life and as advancement was more likely in the military services in combat he requested active duty in Vietnam. While there Carol faithfully stayed at home looking after the children.
His plane was shot down in 1967 when he ignored mission instructions to stay above 15,000 feet he went “down on the deck” and was shot down, survived and became a Prisoner Of War, POW.

[...]

His father and grandfather were both decorated Navy Admirals. He was given special privileges and extreme preferential treatment while he served in the Navy. He was a pilot but according to his colleagues, he was a very bad pilot. He actually crashed three planes. There was a horrendous incident that happened on his aircraft carrier, the U.S.S. Forrestal, that killed 134 men. There has been a rolling debate since the incident and some are convinced John McCain was responsible.

Witnesses reported McCain attempted a “wet start.”  When a pilot wants to be a show-off, with a “wet start” his engine start creates a large startling flame and lots of surprise noise from the rear of a jet engine on startup. McCain did the “Wet Start.”  The flames torched the launch of a Zuni rocket on the plane behind him.  Zuni rockets were notorious for problems. It shot across the carrier’s deck hitting other parked planes that were packing 1,000 high-explosive pound bombs which exploded.  Destruction and fire went several decks below and nearly sunk this major 82,000 ton U.S. aircraft carrier.

This stunt caused the death of 134 sailors and blew off arms, legs, and caused blindness and burns to another 161 sailors. McCain jumped from his plane, rolled across the flames, and escaped. He watched the men dying and the burning from a closed circuit television on the ship.

The ship off line for two years in port for $76 million dollars of major repairs, not including the cost of the airplanes or ammunition.  Any other Navy pilots causing this type of death and destruction would have been arrested and still be in prison, but not John McCain III .... There is much more


I'm late with thisand other things but for the past week I've been too filled with hatre ... dissatisfaction for the filthy Left to discuss anything rationally.  As regard the late John McCain, even though he was a self serving bag of shite, as a Catholic he knew that by asking forgiveness of God he could avoid an eternity in Hell.  However, it seems that he was so filled with matters like instructing that Sarah Palin not be allowed at his funeral services to  save his sorry ass.   Spit

Saturday, April 08, 2017

So much to choose from ....





Saturday, December 31, 2016

What am I missing here?






(Via Reuters) […]  Republican John McCain, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on Friday that Russia must face a penalty for the cyber attacks and that is was possible to impose many sanctions.

“When you attack a country, it’s an act of war,” McCain said in an interview with the Ukrainian TV channel “1+1” while on a visit to Kiev. Blah-Blah-Blah
I think I speak for the greater nation that hoped the McCain-Palin ticket had won 2008.  Not just because it would have spared us the near demolishing of the Republic by the Kenyan; but because there was reason to hope the sonabitch would soon die in office and leave us with a potentially great President Palin. And, because he's unhinged.  Anyway, can somebody tell me what it was the Russians did with the "cyber attacks."  And, has any proof of said attack been shown?  And, even if Putin did somehow arrange for the Hillary-Podesta e-mails, illegally saved on an illegal cell phone, to surface, is he claiming they were counterfeit?  No?  Then, if the Russians did what he sad they did, shouldn't he be promoting a Medal of Honor for Putin?  For saving us from the final disaster,  a Hillary White House? 

Friday, July 24, 2015

Mommy, I smell stink ..


  Poll: 22% of the GOP agree McCain is a douche
                                
only 22%  ???  ....                      



The festering carbuncle that is today's GOP festers on, only more.

[...] In other words, as many Republicans think McCain is a douche as are supporting Jeb Bush + Ben Carson. In fact, more Republicans think McCain is a douche than actually support Trump. Half may disagree but half either agree or don’t care enough to have an opinion.

Before we go any further… I am not a Trump supporter. But I do agree with Erick, that if he is the nominee I will support him and do so more enthusiastically than I did either McCain or Romney.

This result should scare the bejeezus out of a lot of people… some of my colleagues among them. It should really be a wake-up call to GOP donors and apparatchiks who are trying to use mean-girl tactics learned in the middle school bathroom to hurt Trump:

“ Many national Republican officials are increasingly resigned to Mr. Trump’s looming presence. At a meeting of the Republican Governors Association this week in Aspen, Colo., donors and operatives mused about how to prevent him from hijacking the debate.

One idea that came up was to urge three leading candidates — Jeb Bush, the former Florida governor; Mr. Walker; and Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) 91% of Florida — to band together and state that they would not participate in any debate in which Mr. Trump was present, using his refusal to rule out a third-party bid as a pretext for taking such a hard line. The thinking, according to a Republican involved in the conversations, was that the lesser-funded prospects who have been eclipsed by Mr. Trump would follow suit, and the TV networks airing the debates would be forced to bar Mr. Trump in order to have a full complement of candidates.
FULL

The more of these little games the GOP Establishment plays the more adamant and entrenched Trump’s support will become. It these people want to get rid of him, they need to start ignoring him or start talking about the issues he’s talking about that are drawing crowds. And if they don’t want him to run as a third party candidate they had better lay off these shenanigans and try to win the primary on their own merits. You don’t even need to be a Trump supporter to be in favor of that.

Tuesday, April 14, 2015

Lois Lerner Meets John McCain

                         
 Obama's Waffen Schutzstaffel  







Tom Fitton, senior official for Judicial Watch (Mark Levin's group), wrote the Breitbart article below.  Yes, you will blow a gasket reading it.  But just wait till you get to the part Sen. John McCain plays.  If you hated him before, you will hate him even more now.  And the bastard has the audacity to announce he will run for another term! -skoonj

Judicial Watch has just released a new batch of documents forced out of the IRS that show the Obama administration’s scandalous misuse of the IRS to target Tea Party and other conservatives goes far deeper than realized.

Included in the new batch of documents is a February 2012 email from Lois Lerner, who was then head of the IRS’ Exempt Organizations Branch, asking that a special program be set up to “put together some training points to help [IRS staffers] understand the potential pitfalls” of revealing too much information to
A May 1, 2013, email exchange between Lois Lerner and other top IRS staffers revealed that she met with select top staffers from the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee in a “marathon” meeting to discuss concerns raised by both Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI) and McCain that the IRS was not reining in political advocacy groups in response to the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision.
Congress. Amid the hundreds of released pages, Judicial Watch also found a remarkable Lerner email from 2013 in which she says she is willing to take the blame for not having provided sufficient direction to her underlings on how best to investigate the targeted groups, and then concedes that she “understands why the IRS criteria” leading to targeting of Tea Party groups and other opponents of President Obama “might raise questions.”

In May 2013, the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) released an audit revealing the IRS had used “inappropriate criteria” to identify potential political cases. “Early in Calendar Year 2010,” TIGTA wrote, “the IRS began using inappropriate criteria to identify organizations applying for tax-exempt status to (e.g., lists of past and future donors).” The illegal IRS reviews continued for more than 18 months and, TIGTA reported, “delayed processing of targeted groups’ applications” preparing for the 2012 presidential election.”

Not so coincidentally, during this period of time, Lerner emailed former Director of the Office of Rulings and Agreements Holly Paz, attempting to limit information provided by the IRS to Congress about non-profit classifications. Here is the exchange:
Thursday, February 16, 2012 1:28 PM– Lois Lerner to Holly Paz:

Subject: Review of Classification Write -Ups

While you were gone, Judy [Kindell – former Lerner advisor] and Sharon [Light – Lerner advisor] had the opportunity to look at some of the write –up from the referral committee and classification folks on cases they had reviewed. We are all a bit concerned about the mention of specific Congress people, practitioners and political parties. Our filed folks are not as sensitive as we are to the fact that anything we write can be public–or at least be seen by Congress. We talked with Nan [Downing – Director of EO Examinations] and she thought it would be great if R & A could put together some training points to help them understand the potential pitfalls, as well as how to think about referrals. As a starting point, Nan has sent up a bunch of papers that I asked Tom Miller [EO technical advisor] to review to provide feedback to Sharon/Judy –or whomever we decide should draft the training.

Continue

Not that there wasn't enough evidence to send Lois Lerner to the electric chair before, but she is a Democrat appointee of Bronc-O-Bama so her 1200 get out of jail free cards must be burned one at a time. 

And McCain? He, I think, sees the world through a get-even entitlement  prism that trumps any integrity he may have once had. To wit:  Why did he get so riled at the Swiftboaters who exposed Kerry as the liar and phony that he is?  Because there are a cadre of his fellow Hanoi Hilton POW who claim that he collaborated with his Vietnamese captors. So he saddled up with Kerry because either he felt: that

   1.   Kerry was being victimized by the same ilk of jealous liars, or
   2.   out of some psychological need to aid other phony heroes in order to protect the elaborate wall of denial he's built. 

Either way, he's flawed.  And because so many Conservatives (people valuing integrity he so lacks) have, over the years, pointed out his massive flip-floppery, and worked so hard to deny his nomination for president, we are become in his eyes just more Hanoi Hilton people who need carpet bombing.  That's what I see.


Monday, February 18, 2013

McCain does good then does bad

Meet The MSNBC Press

McCain claims ‘massive cover-up’ on Benghazi


Visit CNBC for the best in sycophancy, DNC ass- licking, and fabricated world news,


While discussing the contentious confirmation hearings for defense secretary nominee Chuck Hagel, things got a bit heated on Sunday's "Meet The Press" when Sen. John McCain referred to the lack of information from the White House surrounding the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks in Benghazi as a "massive cover-up."

A retired four-star admiral is now claiming that Barack Obama intentionally conspired withAmerica’s enemies to stage a bogus attack and the kidnapping of an American ambassador so he could “negotiate” the release of a “hostage” and bolster his mediocre approval ratings just prior to the election!
Gregory then pressed McCain on what the Arizona senator meant by "a massive cover-up."

"I'm asking you, do you care whether four Americans died?" McCain said. "And shouldn't people be held accountable for the fact that four Americans died?"

"Well, what you said was the cover-up--a cover-up of what?" Gregory asked.

David Gregory, as always his contentious self, does his best to deflect McCain's charge that the Administration have lied through their teeth about what really happened .  In the end McCain reverts to being the McCain and the GOP we know and love do well (cough-cough) by stating—

"I don't believe he is qualified, but I don't believe that we should hold up his nomination any further."


Sunday, November 27, 2011

Without Irony ...





Saturday, June 05, 2010

McCain-Sphincter 2012?

I'm going to push you
over with a feather


Why not just stab me in the liver?


It is quite a contrast to his 2000 presidential campaign, when he openly criticized and needled conservatives. This last Saturday, he even gave a graduation talk at Jerry Falwell’s Liberty University (though, for balance, he will also be addressing this week graduates at New York City’s very left-wing New School). 

Reporters speculated on Meet the Press on Sunday that McCain wants to make amends with conservatives well before he officially announces his candidacy for president next year. So can he convince people he is still sufficiently conservative?
 
Let’s consider just one of these issues: McCain’s claimed pro-gun record. This was true a decade ago, but since then, on issues such as regulating gun shows, banning less expensive guns and so-called assault weapons, and requiring gunlocks, McCain has supported central portions of the gun-control agenda. Indeed, in a couple cases, McCain authored the proposed legislation himself.  [Friendly Fire continued]

Ain't we been here before?
In deference to his service to our nation, I have in the past attempted to give McCain the benefit of the doubt.  "His Vietnamese captors beat his brains out"; "He receives instructions from the Manchurian micro-chip  the commies planted."  Regardless, the man is, like Obama, a threat to our democracy.   That he is planning to run again for president is all the proof I need to offer. It's also proof that McCain is still comfortable with the people running the Republican Party.  But, alas, I have a long record of not being right about such things.

Thursday, December 04, 2008

Obama's Money

McCain Couldn't Compete With Obama's Money
... and whose fault was that?
Please Sir, can I have two nickels?
Karl Rove knows why McCain lost, and of course he's right.  I also think it's poetic justice.
If money talks, we'll likely soon hear the real reason why Barack Obama beat John McCain. Both men and the national parties will report to the Federal Election Commission today how much money they raised in October and November. And what the numbers will probably show is that Mr. Obama outspent Mr. McCain by the biggest margin in history, perhaps a quarter of a billion dollars.--  [Continued]
Poetic Justice that McCain was hoist on his own McCain Feingold Campaign Finance petard.  But, come to think of it, the very restrictions that  did him in, were also what allowed the media to make him the nominee in the first place, despite the fact that we, the Republican base, hated his guts.  Just a taste of what happens when only certain people have access to the First Amendment.  I suspect we'll be getting progressively larger helpings of that particular gruel.

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Now go to your room, and don't show your face again

Take this punch in the gut, you coward
Finally: McCain speaks out on Palin — and doesn't say a whole lot

Hot Air links to this Yahoo News  story about McCain's appearance with Leno last night.  This version is more enlightening.  Yesterday the WSJ set the marker.
So it will be telling if Mr. McCain stands up for his partner and says how offended he has been by what some of his staffers have done to her.
 Leno gave him an opening, and he passed it up.

Asked by Leno to address griping about Palin from unidentified McCain operatives in the days following the election, the Arizona senator said, "These things happen in campaigns.

"I think I have at least a thousand, quote, top advisers," he scoffed. "A top adviser said? ... I've never even heard of ... a top adviser or a high-ranking Republican official."

As if to anticipate the charge that 75% of the Palin bashing is/was manufactured by in-the-tank media, AP adds gratuitously ..
However, McCain never directly addressed the embarrassing controversy over Palin's expensive campaign wardrobe purchased by the Republican National Committee, or statements by unidentified McCain aides who have reportedly said she was not prepared on foreign policy or other issues. The Alaska governor has said in interviews she did not ask for, or want, the $150,000-plus wardrobe for her and her family.
"Embarrassing controversy?" What pissants.  Of more importance: Obama has received over $300 million that is unEXPLAINED. That's an actual  "Embarrassing controversy."

Friday, October 31, 2008

Jews for McCain?

Watching The Sausage Being Made Here Boss
First exit poll of actual American votes from Israel shows big McCain win


On the Bizarre-O-Meter, Jewish support for Obama makes the needle disappear.  So maybe those 76% projections are nuts, as this report could indicate.

[NRO]

Within the last hour, the first exit poll of 817 Americans in Israel, who attended U.S. election voting events in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv on Tuesday evening to vote by absentee ballot, has been released.

A startling 76 percent of those polled said that they had voted for John McCain. This contrasts sharply with pre-election polls of American Jews in the U.S., which indicate a strong preference for Obama.

The exit poll findings of American voters in Israel are all the more surprising because less than one in four were registered Republicans, and 46% of registered Democrats living in Israel said they had crossed party lines to vote McCain. By contrast, the Republican crossover to Obama was minimal – just 2%.

The votes are significant as almost half of the 42,000 registered U.S. voters living in Israel come from key swing states including Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

In the 2000 and 2004 elections, Israel had the third-largest group of American voters abroad, after Canada and Britain.

The exit poll was commissioned by Votefromisrael.org, an independent, non-partisan organization dedicated to promoting voter registration and participation amongst American citizens living in Israel.

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

McCain Debate II

 Mood
[Kathryn Jean Lopez]

The Corner's  Kathryn Jean Lopez is a personal bellwether, so it was to her that I turned this morning, hoping to learn that my initial fears  -  that caused me to throw McCain from my living room 3 minutes into the debate - were unfounded. 
This is a fuller elucidation of what a lot of people are e-mailing me:

    Kathryn, love your articles, you seem to have the pulse of the country much more than most. McCain kissed it away tonight. Without some unforeseen event, he will lose by about 6-8 points and assure a Democratic majority in the Congress and the Senate, although I still think the Republicans will hold onto about 42 seats or so in the Senate, although with Snowe and others, I’m not sure that means much. However, he has created the future and maybe that was his role in everything. The same way that Ford created Reagan by allowing Carter to win with his bad debate performance, I think McCain has created our future with Palin. Her instincts and idealogy with 4 more years of experience coupled with an Obama Administration (ala Carter) will lead to a conservative revival which hopefully, at 43 years old, will be the last one that I have to experience in my life. The next 4 years are going to be brutal, although hopefully, the Democrats will overreach during the first two years and usher in Republicans to the House and Senate that understand the mistakes of the past and start acting like Republicans. With Gov. Jindall, Gov. Palin and Gov. Romney (who I voted for in the primary in Georgia, because I saw this coming, and I loved Gov. Romney’s message), the Republicans will be reborn. We, as a party, need to say never again to moderate, old Senators, or even VP’s (see Dole, McCain and Bush 1) and start putting forward young, energetic and idea driven governors. They have executive experience, ideas and the ability to communicate the ideals that make our party great. I hate that we have to go through the next 4 years with Obama at the helm. We will be tested severely by every adversary we have in the world and Obama’s instinct to talk and negotiate above every other action will serve us terribly.

    My family and I will suffer serious financial hardship over the next 4 years. Obama has no understanding of those of us who work 80 hour weeks, spend countless nights away from our families to provide a good life for them and aren’t some notorious CEO’s ( could that guy from Lehman be a bigger idiot?).Gov. Romney’s speech at CPAC and Gov. Palin in this campaign are the only two people that I have seen that speak to us who bust our backsides to support our family, don’t want Government to give us anything and understand what we are all about.

    It is time for the younger conservatives to rise up, take control of our party and start expelling the idiots like [continued]
While KJL obviously knows those sentiments, she channels me and issues a demurrer.  She will not roll over and quit.

I'm not there. I still have the fight in me. You know why? Tuesday night: What Barack Obama said about 9/11 encapsulated it for me. As Gov. Palin might put it: He just doesn't get it. "A lot of you remember the tragedy of 9/11." Were there five-year-olds in the room there I missed? We all remember, Senator. And tragedy? Maybe we should elect the head of the Red Cross commander-in-chief. 

I'm still confident that the good guys will crack the Jap code and be waiting for them at Midway.  USA! UAS! USA!

Saturday, September 27, 2008

It's down to Palin-Biden folks

Today's Inquest
Debate
College Humor's President Palin

There was nary a "YES!" McCain moment  last night, but a few verged.

MCCAIN: Well -- well, let me give you an example of what Senator Obama finds objectionable, the business tax.

Right now, the United States of American business pays the second-highest business taxes in the world, 35 percent. Ireland pays 11 percent.

Now, if you're a business person, and you can locate any place in the world, then, obviously, if you go to the country where it's 11 percent tax versus 35 percent, you're going to be able to create jobs, increase your business, make more investment, et cetera.


There were several "YOU STUPID MFCSMF" moments when Obama was responding.   Here was one ...

OBAMA:  Just one last point I want to make, since Senator McCain talked about providing a $5,000 health credit. Now, what he doesn't tell you is that he intends to, for the first time in history, tax health benefits.

So you may end up getting a $5,000 tax credit. Here's the only problem: Your employer now has to pay taxes on the health care that you're getting from your employer. And if you end up losing your health care from your employer, you've got to go out on the open market and try to buy it.


What a great concept! Didn't we do that once?  Everyone  going to the markets for their health care would mean competition, and lower cost. A concept utterly lost on Obamanation.  And how many of Obama's statements were entirely devoid of falsehood?  Maybe the eight times he said "Well, Senator McCain is absolutely right.

But that's not what I was gonna talk about.  This is.

The left have been using the prospect of McCain dying in office as a scare tactic (my graphic is a screen cap from this College Humor home movie).  First, guess whose mother was alive and attended her son's nomination ceremony?  Hint: It wasn't Obama's. Second.   That sort of reasoning only serves to make this a Palin-Obama race, and puts a huge emphasis on the Palin-Biden  vice-presidential debate.  Not what Democrats want, I'll assure you.


Friday, September 26, 2008

Mississippi Mud

Debate between Sen. McCain and "We"

Enough, I watched with the Corner stars, and cherry picked below.  Mo Sup watched in a separate room.  Her opinion is that Obama will be perceived the winner -- because he "sounded" knowledgeable.  When you're going after the undecided vote, you're going after people who are disengaged, and easy prey for a good liar, which Obama is.  Worked for Clinton.  We'll see.

Notes from the Corner
It needs more cowbell.

...won't have to rehash whether or not we should have gone into Iraq. Good answer, McCain. Obama looks small trying to gain credit for opposing the war when he was a state senator. 

40 mins in.

And Lehrer compares it to Vietnam. Nice unbiased question.

Did he just say the president RULES the country?

We're at war. Do we get a foreign-policy debate?

I can't watch this without the Newshour music.

And I miss McNeil.

I think McCain scored there—Obama looked wishy-washy. And also scores on nuclear and drilling.

  • I understand why the NYTimes won't defend McCain's tax policies    [Michael Graham]

...but can someone explain to my why SEN. MCCAIN won't defend them?  Sen. Obama got away with the "$4 billion in tax cuts for oil companies" scam because McCain didn't point out that he wants to lower taxes on every business across the board.  It would have pointed out that Sen. Obama's blatantly misleading people about McCain.

Meanwhile, Obama is sharing a laundry list of new spending and McCain is letting him walk.  Why not just ask "Sen. Obama, you just listed billions in new spending. How will you pay for it?"

This is supposed to be a national-security debate. Half hour in, we're still on econ.

Obama shouldn't have said "John" when McCain is saying "Senator Obama."

  • Not His Debate   [Mark R. Levin]

Iraq, al-Qaeda, Afghanistan ... Obama is rambling now.

  • Yowzer!    [Amy Holmes]

When asked about his failure to hold a single oversight hearing on NATO, or visit Iraq for 900 days, or consult with General Patreus, Obama smiled and said that he's very proud of his VP! Basically inferring that he doesn't need to worry about that Commander in Chief stuff because he's got Joe Biden to handle all of that!

Obama admit Joe Biden is his foreign-policy cred?

Nasty doesn't look good on Obama.

  • From a Civilian Mom    [Amy Holmes]

Watching at home here in NYC with her husband and two little babies: "I hope I am not assessing out of my pro-McCain bias, but McCain has had Obama on the defensive 90% of the time. And Obama is rambling on so much- good lord I can barely follow him!"

Did Obama really just do that? Try and contradict "don't let my son die in vain"?

tell O'Reilly Iran is a serious threat?

  • McCain Pounds the Precondition Point   [Rich Lowry]
  • Obama's Problem   [Mark R. Levin]

What strikes me most about this debate is how often Obama dissembles — both about what he has said in the past and his policies. Say what you might about McCain, but you cannot say he dissembles.

  • McCain's the Aggressor in the Debate   [Rich Lowry]

But Obama is counter-punching well enough for his purposes—basically holding his own in a national-security debate.

I hate it when Obama refers to himself that way. I wish McCain would turn to him and say, "Who is `we' Sen. Obama?"

  • "Senator Obama Doesn't Quite Understand"   [Rich Lowry]

There it is again.

(I'm off to walk the dog)

Ghost of Agnew

The Ghost of Spiro to the Rescue
Real Straight Talk Expressing
David Brinkley, NBC on Agnew
Howard K. Smith, CBS on Agnew
Spiro Agnew on Vietnam



The 1969 era commercials are an extra added attraction.
If John McCain had the temper attributed to him, he'd already have shot Reid betwixt his beady eyes.

  1. ... Earlier this week that Reid told the White House it was essential McCain take an active role in crafting the bailout—something that would certainly keep McCain off the campaign trail.
  2. McCain announced he was suspending his campaign and possibly postponing a presidential debate in order to get to Washington to work on the bill. 
  3. "It appears to me John McCain is trying to divert attention to his failing campaign," Reid said during a press conference Wednesday. 
  4. Reid indicated Thursday that he will not hold any votes in the Senate on Friday so McCain has “no excuses” to skip the debate scheduled for that day.
Town Hall   
 
Obama is a platitudinous pop-tart, and ought not have a chance against McCain debating this issue. But, his financial acumen is on a par with my own, and the media are lined up to attack him no matter what he says. The answer is  "Straight Talk Express."  It's here that Sarah Palin can come to his rescue for a second time. 

If she independently gets off the "fat cat Wall Street" bus, and assaults the democrats, and the media for covering for them, listing the string of Democrat failure,  and complicity in setting the climate for the free-for-all credit debacle, she forces his hand. That's right.  Sarah puts the boss on the spot.   At that point he has to react one of two ways.  Join her in the attack, or wave the white flag.  (Watch archive videos of Spiro Agnew for style, Sarah.  The media hated Agnew's guts, but the American voting public loved him. )

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

George Will Loses His Mind

Blah-Balh-Blah

George Will' says McCain Loses His Head.  Duh.  McCain, deserves the smackdown for his wretched behavior during the financial crisis, -- which almost identically mirrors Obama's own, but not as bad, and McCain can rant without a script.  In fact,  McCain blaming Chris Cox is nearly as egregiously stupid as Will himself inferring  that the only impediment to a successful  Obama presidency is inexperience. Maybe someone will pen "Will Loses His Head."

The lefty blogs of course are going bananas with Will quotations, which they largely misread  and distort.  Here's a sample:

Has George Will ever opposed any Republican nominee before? I don't think so.

But in today's Washington Post, the most influential conservative columnist of them all addresses the main reason McCain should not be President. His temperament. Will views McCain as an intemperate hothead, an irrational rager, a scapegoater, and a hater.


This guy is also uninformed, and dead wrong.
  • George Will, "the most influential conservative columnist of them all?"
    •  Not even close. He's three pickles removed from being a RINO burger.
  • Has George Will "ever opposed any Republican nominee before?"  Yup.  George Herbert Walker Bush, whom he referred to as Reagan's lap dog. 
 

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Horry Clap Batman

Obama-Biden ejected


The only difference in this Sienna September Poll, over one in August that had Obama way up is "that in September, Siena polled likely voters, whereas in August it only polled registered voters."  The likely voter method is significantly more accurate, and thus tens not to be used by in the Obama tank media polls.  Oy Vey Jay Jay!! 
Via Gatewaypundit

Sunday, September 14, 2008

The Atlantic hires Leni Riefenstahl

Did you lie to me?
Please don't spank me Daddy.

My first take when I saw this earlier was Alexander "I'm in charge here" Haig.  Just for a second.  It was McCain, obviously not photographed by an admirer, but I didn't yet know the story behind it. The more I looked at it, the more I saw some  merit in presenting McCain as the stern enforcer.  It could have appeal to voters who want someone tough in the White House, or peeps into kinky sex. That would be a kick in Atlantic's ass, eh wot?  On the order of The New Yorker's Obama cover
Islamo Terrorists
backfire. Either way, the left media are green snot. 

Saturday, September 13, 2008

Hey Barry, you have crap on your shoes - again


STAND UP CHUCK!

McCain's severe war injuries prevent him from combing his hair, typing on a keyboard, or tying his shoes. - McCain character loyal to a fault Boston Globe Staff, 3/4/2000

McCain is so stupid he can't use a computer! - Barack Obama


Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Rubicon Crossed

Intrade quotes:

McCain Wins Bid - 49.5 Ask - 49.6

Obama Wins Bid - 48.6 Ask - 48.9
Fliteline Lounge