Washington,
D.C. — Today, the Energy & Environment Legal Institute (E&E
Legal), a 501 (c) (3) watchdog group, released an investigative report,
Private Interests & Public Office: Coordination Between Governors,
the Obama White House and the Tom Steyer-“Founded and Funded” Network
of Advocacy Groups to Advance the “Climate” Agenda (and anappendix of
source documents),
revealing a vast,
coordinated, three-track effort by public officials and private
interests to promote EPA’s expansive, overreaching and economically
devastating greenhouse gas rules, specifically the section 111(d)
regulation to shut the nation’s fleet of existing coal-fired power
plants, as well as the December Paris climate treaty President Obama is
expected to sign to replace the Kyoto Protocol.
“Our report pulls the curtain back on a carefully planned and heavily
funded ‘orchestration’ by individuals who have placed their personal
interests ahead of the public interest,” said Chris Horner, E&E
Legal’s Senior Legal Fellow and the report’s author.
The
scheme took shape at a meeting in the White House in December 2013,
after which the Obama administration launched coordinated with the
“core group” of activist Democrat governors to design one of what we
see are three tracks to promote the climate agenda
The report is the product of open records requests over the course of a
year at the federal level and nearly 30 offices in over a dozen states.
The exposé contains appendices with over a hundred pages of source
emails and attachments. It details a campaign to use public offices, in
very close collaboration with wealthy benefactors, to advance and
defend President Obama’s climate change regulatory and treaty agenda.
This quasi-governmental campaign involves more than a dozen governors’
offices, with a parallel advocacy network and political operation
funded and staffed by activists paid through ideologically ,
economically and politically motivated donors.
The report released today points to emails obtained by E&E Legal’s
campaign without litigation, but also in federal district court; others
are the subject of oral arguments made last week in court in Richmond,
Virginia, and a new suit just filed against the Governor of Kentucky.
The latter complaint objects to a false “no records” claim — about
records that this report proves do in fact exist, and even quotes from,
but which are being kept from the public by a governor who claims to be
appalled by EPA rules his office was quietly a “core group” promoter of
for the past two years.
This report is timely given President Obama’s ongoing tour to promote
the same EPA rules that these governors and “major environmental
donors” scheme to promote in the correspondence released today. This
includes a stop today at Harry Reid’s “clean energy economy”
conference, curiously also sponsored by the same donors as those
playing a leading role in today’s report.
Indeed these emails E&E Legal uncovered also show this campaign was
developed with the early, active support and participation of the White
House, which went beyond enthusiastically embracing the plan and follow
up meetings and calls, to even directing the governors to what one
green trade-press outlet calls a “shadowy group” affiliated with
then-Chief of Staff John Podesta. The White House’s followup actions ,
as one governor’s aide praised them, were “moving dials”. Podesta also
convinced the governors’ offices that their plan should be broken into
separate, complementary pillars. The latest email obtained, from May of
this year, shows the governors’ campaign arranging to coordinate with
the State Department.
The scheme took shape at a meeting in the White House in December 2013,
after which the Obama administration launched coordinated with the
“core group” of activist Democrat governors to design one of what we
see are three tracks to promote the climate agenda. One was run by the
Steyer network and left-wing foundations. Another is run by governors
with green groups, which are “useful” but whose “standard NGO shaming
strategy might not deliver”. A third, run by the White House includes,
in the words of a senior aide, “a few other tracks with private sector
and unusual allies”.
Nearly every aspect of this effort, from the key early players to the
funders and even the director the governors’ campaign hired — housed by
some state’s taxpayers in the Hall of States in Washington, DC,
overhead paid for by as-yet unknown means — has direct ties to a
scandal involving “clean energy” donors and conflicts of interest, one
which felled Oregon’s sitting governor earlier this year.
In what is possibly the most intriguing element, seemingly out of an
episode of “House of Cards”, Democratic governors’ aides repeatedly
reference a plan of “creative engagement” to “compel” certain electric
utilities — those subject to their jurisdiction whose businesses cross
lines into states led by Republicans — to bring “red state” governors
around to support the EPA rules: “[B]ecause there are key utilities
whose service territories cross red and blue states Governors in these
states could quietly engineer a breakthrough strategy that compels
utilities in key red states to lead the charge to win over a key
Governor, rather than rely on a standard NGO-shaming strategy that
might not deliver.”
The “core group” of governors also coordinated with Democratic
mega-donor Tom Steyer and his managing partner, Ted White, who directed
them to “affiliated groups that we founded and fund (such as NextGen
Climate Action, or Next Generation, or AEE [Advanced Energy Economy]” .
Those groups in turn underwrote consultants and activists to hand-hold
governors through implementing the Obama EPA’s rules, keeping them from
the clutches of the “just say no” states.
This core group soon expanded to more than a dozen states, coast-to-
coast, embracing a four-point plan which they soon called the
Governor’s Climate Compact or GCC, which was ultimately rebranded as
the Governors’ Climate Accord or GCA and now goes by the name of the
Governors Clean Energy Initiative (none of which have any internet
footprint whatsoever, and begging the question who is indeed paying for
its director and other overhead). The emails do reflect an awareness
that the agenda’s lack of popularity in the “flyover states”
necessitated a flexible timeline and keeping some offices’ involvement
quiet, specifically citing elections as a concern.
“This is the 5th transparency report in a series that E&E Legal has
published on the ‘green movement’ and its network of public, private,
and business interests, and what is clear is that 1%-ers are using
‘climate’ policies to destroy politically disfavored industries in
order to transfer wealth to the politically preferred,” said Craig
Richardson, E&E Legal Executive Director. “The campaign by
self-serving individuals must be made known to the public as
policymakers consider this plan that will destroy parts of our economy
and ruin the most efficient, affordable, and clean energy system ever
created.” [
WATTS Full Megillah]
As for me, I will find some comfort in these words from 
