Showing posts with label Impeach Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Impeach Obama. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 08, 2014

Biblical Proportions











Unplugged


How Much for that little boy?

Boned Jello
AFP – Lebanon's Head Booblah, Hassan Nasrallah delivers a televised speech during a ceremony marking …

CONSIDER THIS - A hot war in the Middle East seems inevitable.  As things stand, I expect the UN  will side with Iran and its client states Syria, Lebanon, and the Palestinians,  against Israel.  Would Obama join with the UN, a body to which he's showed more allegiance to than he has the United States?  Or with Israel, whom he's been undermining since he took office?  If he follows form, US troops under UN command would find themselves  fighting alongside  radical Islam, and  against the Israelis.  In the event Bin-Barry gave that order, what would you expect to happen?

#####
Bin-Barry does not have the cahones to give that order, much as he'd like to, because the danger of a mutiny in the US forces would be too great.
~
#####
Nope.
As Anon. said, too many "Sorry, message garbled in transmission."
I wouldn't put it past him to call for some sort of Abraham Lincoln Brigade (again composed mainly of commies, socialists, anarchists, and suckers), though.
He would probably cancel all military cooperation/funding programs, though.
~
#####
They will do what they are told because they are American soldiers and just because they may despise the person who is their CIC doesn't mean that they won't obey him. 

Now if they are ordered to attack Americans then all bets are off. However, ordering them to stand with the UN even against an ally would be tough, but obeyed.
~
#####
Chris is correct in that they (as I was once part of "they" for 20 some odd years) will obey any lawful order given. Having us act as an agent of the UN (and yes, we have done that before in the former Yugoslavia -if memory serves correctly-, and during Korea.) and directly oppose our, up to now, staunchest Allie in the Middle East, would be folly of the greatest order.

Though I would not put it past the current occupant of the oval office to attempt such a thing.

So no, I don't think the majority of the Armed Forces would stand behind such an order.
~
#####
As the prospect of a hot war picks up in the middle east, owing mostly to dithering on the part of the Obama white house, we should probably start now to insure that the conflict is called "Obama's War"

It's possible that the prospect of having a war named after him might seem even worse than having an environmental disaster with your name on it.
~
#####
That ude needs to wear a burqua.
~
#####
This would be a very bad mistake on Obumbles part. And it wouldn't be our fault. Muahahaha!

The rollover Impeach Him is directly related to Obama's utter mismanagement (in the kindest sense) of the middle east,  Obama has from day one worked against Israel and for the Islamos.  This was predictable, and predicted.  Four years ago I wondered when and if Obama would put US troops under UN command  in support of Hamas ....

One more thought.  I'm wondering if  phony Hollywood Jews who largely made Obama possible will beat breasts over Israels plight now?



Oh, and ...





Saturday, January 25, 2014

Yes, Let's Do Impeach the Sumbitch



 Dems’ ‘don’t impeach Obama’ email backfires Suddenly, millions of Americans talking about ousting president
DNC EMAIL
I hadn't seen this before reading it via WND, but I promise you that if I was a DNC muck-a-muck I'd have cautioned against sending this to the herds.  The LoFo voters who comprise the bulk of Dem voters would likely have no idea that the word impeachment had even been uttered.  Evidently several news services picked it up and, in effect, put the idea into play. 

Nice to know that DNC puppeteers are as clueless as their GOP counterparts when it comes to knowing what their clientèle know, or want.


Among the offenses enumerated in one book:


    * Obamacare not only is unconstitutional but illegally bypasses Congress, infringes on states’ rights and marking an unprecedented and unauthorized expansion of IRS power.
    * Sidestepping Congress, Obama already has granted largely unreported de facto amnesty to millions of illegal aliens using illicit interagency directives and executive orders.
    * The Obama administration recklessly endangered the public by releasing from prison criminal illegal aliens at a rate far beyond what is publicly known.
    * The president’s personal role in the Sept. 11, 2012, Benghazi attack, with new evidence regarding what was transpiring at the U.S. mission prior to the assault – arguably impeachable activities in and of themselves.
    * Illicit edicts on gun control in addition to the deadly “Fast and Furious” gun-running operation intended, the book shows, to collect fraudulent gun data.
    * From “fusion centers” to data mining to drones to alarming Department of Homeland Security power grabs, how U.S. citizens are fast arriving at the stage of living under a virtual surveillance regime.
    * New evidence of rank corruption, cronyism and impeachable offenses related to Obama’s first-term “green” funding adventures.
    * The illegality of leading a U.S.-NATO military campaign without congressional approval.
    * Obama has weakened America both domestically and abroad by emboldening enemies, tacitly supporting a Muslim Brotherhood revolution, spurning allies and minimizing the threat of Islamic fundamentalism.






Google Auto Complete






What Your State Wants, According to Google Autocomplete


Google Autocomplete is notorious for taking a standard search and anticipating something completely ridiculous.

In the style of Tumblr user [garbled, looks like Assclown], we conducted our own experiment and created a map of what each state wants (according to Autocomplete).

SEE ALSO: 20 Searches Made Ridiculous by Google Autocomplete



Tell us what your state really wants and I'll make an accurate map.







Friday, September 20, 2013

It's Time


Tap ... Tap... Tap...

Remember when Obama promised to bankrupt coal? That’s tomorrow.
Obama is set to ban all future coal-fired power plant construction tomorrow by regulatory fiat.

Res Ipsa Loquitor

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

Obamagate

OBAMUNISM, The Party,
                Obama's Gate

Res Ipsa Loquitor

"Benghazi-gate," "IRS-gate," "AP-gate" -- it would seem the intrepid investigators in the dinosaur media, in an effort to repair their shredded reputations, are finally catching up to the truths known months or years ago to those of us who get our news from the internet.

IRS targeting "patriots"?  Not a problem for the dinosaurs; those racist lovers of the Constitution deserved it.  Hillary, Susan, and crew covering up the Benghazi terrorist attack with a bald-faced lie about a video trailer?  The dinosaurs had no problem swallowing this lie until the whistleblowers made it apparent what fools they were for doing so.  Then they had to quickly regroup.  But the Obama administration sucking their vitals from the Obama-friendly Associated Press? 
If you have not yet recognized this truth, then you are waiting for acceptance -- for a lot of people to agree with you -- so you won't be attacked as a raving lunatic should you dare to bring up the subject.
Well, that hurts them directly.  They're under attack!  Unforgivable!

Hey, dinosaurs, now that we have your attention, we have a hot tip for you: there's one big Obama lie that's two years old that you completely missed.  In fact, you suppressed the truth.  And you don't have to dig very hard to find this lie; it can still be downloaded at any time from whitehouse.gov for your own inspection and analysis.  It's the Obama long-form "birth certificate" forgery. [American Thinker]



This very AmThink article, the gist anyway, has been dancing with my brain for a few days.  Yesterday's BENGHAZI-GATE video released a flood of Serotonin.  Why?  I only got to the end of Bill Maher's opening soliloquy, but I saw him speaking with the irritability of anxiety.  Using Maher, then,  as a fair proxy for the entire Dem media complex, I posit that they are—all of them—at some state of  realizing what they've done, and what's about to happen.  Maybe like German industrialists, and other elites who accommodated his rise to power felt when Schickelgruber began snapping necks.  Theirs.

Res Ipsa Loquitor
As a corollary aside,  I was  surprised when stories about Joe Biden running for the presidency in 2016 (Historian bullish on Biden run... ^) started appearing.  I mean Biden, at best,  is viewed as an amiable dunce.  Plus, Hillary has all but been been nominated by the press.  But, if this thing gets really bad, there is no way Hillary Clinton skates out of it.  So who's left?  That's right.  They shoveling sand here boss.

  • Image - Ron "Legal" Metziger
  • Amer Tinker - Tom Mann


Friday, April 05, 2013

Get 'em while they're free






He sees unsecured loans as part of his reparations to minorities agenda.

cuzzin "half-track" ricky



Sunday, February 17, 2013

Obama Taunts Republicans





Obama’s Threat of Climate Change Executive Order Taunts Republicans
"Some congressional Republicans continue to privately discuss the idea of impeaching the President were he to continue bypassing Congress and ignoring the constitutional limitations on his authority."
Res Ipsa Loquitor
  • Some?
  • Privately?
  • "...were he to continue? "


Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Yes, He Deserves Impeachment





Strokes of the Pen


If ever a president deserved impeachment, it's this guy.  I want to focus on Executive Orders here, because after 15 years of trying to make sense of this presidential prerogative, I am still left with too much gobbledygook gook.  Consider:

Although there is no constitutional provision or statute that explicitly permits executive orders, there is a vague grant of "executive power" given in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, and furthered by the declaration "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" made in Article II, Section 3, Clause 5. Most executive orders use these Constitutional reasonings as the authorization allowing for their issuance to be justified as part of the President's sworn duties,[2] the intent being to help direct officers of the U.S. Executive carry out their delegated duties as well as the normal operations of the federal government: the consequence of failing to comply possibly being the removal from office.[3] [Wikipedia]
Ahem;
 Article 2, Section 1, Clause 1

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows

Res Ipsa LoquitorArticle 2, Section 1, Clause 5

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. 



Technically, these regulations and executive decrees are not “laws” — but they might as well be. Over the past century, Congress has granted so much power to the regulatory agencies that the executive branch, not Congress, now writes the majority of new federal rules, averaging about 70,000 pages of regulations per year. But in a last minute orgy, Clinton’s administration is scheduled to issue about 29,000 pages of new regulations made just in the last three months of his term. " - [Here]

In a nation of 315,165,272 people there must be at least  200,000 who are not lawyers, and I'm one of them.  Which is why I cannot do the mental gymnastics necessary to find where presidents find the power to  legislate via the Executive Order.  Maybe it's in the same box where the courts discovered theirs?

Up until Abraham Lincoln (3), there were few if any orders by Presidents that would classify as legislation. The biggest leap in EO use came from Teddy Roosevelt. Before his presidency there had been a TOTAL 158 uses of the EO.   T.R.  issued 1,006!  Wilson had  1,791; FDR  3,723 (over 12+ years and a World War).

It's not really the number of Ex-Orders issued, although to me they're all extra constitutional, and outside of the framer's intent.  It's the degree of maliciousness that really counts.  For instance, Bill Clinton actually issued 364 E.O., but they actually numbered in the thousands, thanks to what regulatory agencies did with them. Coal-Gate was one of his most  outrageous.


" When the president signed the Executive Order designating 1.7 million acres of land in southwest Utah as the Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, his action placed the area off limits to mineral extraction and development. The New York Times reported that the monument encloses the largest coal field in the nation, the Kaiparowitz Plateau, which contains at least 7 billion tons of coal worth over $1 TRILLION. "

He did this without even mentioning it to any of Utah's congressional delegation.  The primary beneficiary?  The Lippo Group, which Clinton was highly indebted to.  Stroke of the Pen! 

Obama has been testing what he could get away with since he took office.  Stopping the deportation of illegals, which directly contravene US law, is impeachable. Now, finally, it appears he may be thwarted by threatening to Executive Order the Second Amendment into the trash bin.  But he won't give up.  Obamacare give Democrats the ability to tax anything, or designate anything health hazard

What's really scary is how congress has gone belly-up to this usurpation of their power.  Traditionally congress goes bat-shat over any Executive Branch meddling, but not now.  Not by the Senate, especially.  Both Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have urged Obama to use E.O/ powers to get what they cannot pass legislatively.  That's how evil they, and their intentions are. And what makes me believe that Obama was " purpose built."



Friday, January 11, 2013

Biden's Gang of Four

                Hitler's Mustache


And you can't stop us!
mao-hitler-stalin-biden

"Vice President Joe Biden’s gun policy recommendations to President Barack Obama will likely include universal background checks, new regulations on high-capacity magazines, and using a federal agency to compile data about gun-related deaths, he said Thursday.

After speaking with his bi-partisan advisory board for  Sane Gun Policy (photo), Biden said that he had 'committed' to Obama to pass along his recommendations by next Tuesday." My panel overwhelmingly  recommends using the Executive Order to save us before it's too late. "The Right Wing NRA nuts and the GOP House have terrorized us long enough."


Authentic enough.


Monday, November 19, 2012

Fictional president's Fictional cabinet

Oh My




Saturday, October 27, 2012

IT WAS OBAMA!

BUMPED UP from 10/27 8:59 PM

BOMBSHELL: US troops in Benghazi would not have been painting targets on the ground unless there was air support overhead. see GATEWAY PUNDIT




"I'm giving you a lot of inside baseball stuff, and maybe putting myself in peril for doing it, but In Extremis Force was turnd down by POTUS at his 5PM Eastern time meeting  .."
This Benghazi thing is breaking six ways to Sunday. What is absolutely for certain is that Obama, Biden and Hillary, the top three officials in an in extremis force situation, are either so staggeringly incompetent as to be criminally negligent, or worse;  were actively working for and with the Islamos who killed the Stevens group. There is no third possibility.

It is also unquestionable that Obama has lied at every juncture of Benghazi, and continues to this day. 

This is one of the damnedest phone calls Rush has ever taken.  The caller—unquestionably an insider, lays out why its a certainty that the POTUS THREE are singularly responsible for this debacle. 



CBS Aks Itself ...





A Plaintiff's Cry
The Lame-stream media reluctance to report anything negative about anything Democrat just got more bizarre.  Here they more or less ask themselves "at what point do we do what we're supposed to?"

At what point does this become a story beyond Fox News? Fox News has learned from sources who were on the ground in Benghazi that an urgent request from the CIA annex for military back-up during the attack on the U.S. consulate and subsequent attack several hours later was denied by U.S. officials — who [...]

This comment pretty much says it all:

Abbey Cavanuagh · Top Commenter
Just read today's Washington Post. Nothing on the front page. Did a word search, a brief mention about 3 weeks ago. Shameful. The media is going to pay for the last 5 years propping Obama up...and this...THIS is unbelievable that they are tamping down on a story of such importance. What I want to know is WHY the Ambassador was set up, and that is exactly what it looks like, even if you just look at the little bit out that's available on the web. To me, and of course, I'm guessing like everybody else that cares, it looks like the Egyptian Brotherhood was going to kidnap the Ambassador in exchange for the Blind Sheik. Those two heroes that finally ignored the stand down order JUST GOT IN THE WAY of a planned kidnapping. Gee, ya think Obama had something to do with this? Oh, and by the way, we might not have to guess if the MEDIA DID IT'S JOB.

Other comments
  • IF George Bush had done these things, what else would be on the front pages but this before the election?
  • There is something beneath this story of such profound significance that they are going to such extremes to hide the truth. What was it? A gun running operation?
 
Now that it's all over for the Obamas, look for CBS's Sixty Minutes, which has assiduously avoided any negative reporting on Obama, to start getting on the record (just as they did with Bill Clinton after he'd been impeached). 


Sunday, October 14, 2012

Let the kids do it

Kids at Play
 K.I.S.S.
An abstract for the paper debunks the claim that the president has the Constitutional to not enforce civil laws crafted and passed by Congress.

Res Ipsa Loquitor


“It’s the duties of the president. He must always uphold the law.”

- John Yoo, Berkeley law professor and former State Department attorney

In the paper entitled, “The Obama Administration, the Dream Act and the Take Care Clause,” authors Robert Delahunty of the University of St. Thomas [Minnesota] and John Yoo, a law professor at University of California at Berkeley and former U.S. deputy assistant attorney general, blast Obama's moratorium on deporting certain illegal immigrants. The professors dismissed the idea that the decision on whether to deport illegal immigrants who are arrested for minor infractions is a matter of prosecutorial discretion.

“If there’s one case and it’s left to the prosecutor well that’s fine, but what Obama did was take a million cases and leave it up to prosecutorial discretion, “John Yoo said to FoxNews.com. “The only reason it’s under [Department of Homeland Security Secretary] Janet Napolitano’s discretion is because Obama had made his decision. If she’s doing it under her own, she would have to be fired.” [Full]

Let's say you could take a group of 3rd graders,  and in a flash inculcate their little brains with the full text and meaning of the U.S. Constitution; and an honest history of the United States.  Having done this, we have them read the law professor's argument, and ask— " what should be done?"   The answers would undoubtedly be:
  1. Impeach and remove this President
  2. If the Congress will not impeach and remove the President, remove them.
  3. If they resist, nourish our "Tree of Liberty" with their blood. 
  4. Give Free Ice Cream to Everyone*
That's how simple this is.  So where have we gone wrong?



* There's always one retard in every class,





Wednesday, June 20, 2012

In contempt of congress - what do it mean?



Obama grants 11th-hour Holder executive privilege request

Res Ipsa Loquitur

The question on everyone's lips is — so what does it mean if he's found in contemptby vote of the full House?  Predictably the law is difficult for the layman to understand.  For instance (from Wikipedia)

.Under this process, the procedure for holding a person in contempt involves only the chamber concerned. Following a contempt citation, the person cited is arrested by the Sergeant-at-Arms for the House or Senate, brought to the floor of the chamber, held to answer charges by the presiding officer, and then subjected to punishment as the chamber may dictate (usually imprisonment for punishment reasons, imprisonment for coercive effect, or release from the contempt citation).

But then, under "Statutory Proceedings," and after this Wikipedia citation —
Res Ipsa Loquitur
This article contains weasel words: vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. Such statements should be clarified or removed. (July 2008)

we read:

.Following a contempt citation, the presiding officer of the chamber is instructed to refer the matter to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia;[9] according to the law it is the "duty" of the U.S. Attorney to refer the matter to a grand jury for action.

We have one instance of an Attorney General of the United States being held in contempt.

Person Subcommittee/Committee Ultimate Disposition
Janet Reno (Democrat),
Attorney General
6 August 1998, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Documents in question were revealed during the impeachment of President Clinton.

That would be a satisfactory outcome here, although I won't hold my breath. In the final analysis, Holder's and Obama's culpability in this effort (F&F) to stage events as a precursor to imposing gun control on us,  is manifestly unmistakable.


Thursday, March 08, 2012

New Meaning for "Bully Pulpit"

Hitler's Mustache               

Giving new meaning to "bully pulpit"









                                                                                                                                                       Res Ipsa Loquitur



















Res Ipsa Loquitur
Threat copy via Sondrakistan

Conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh is being targeted by multiple death threats after President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party ignored his apology for controversial remarks and continued to single him out for rebuke. The assault has
Obama's Thug Nation
become so nakedly partisan and opportunistic that even HBO host Bill Maher--who recently donated $1 million to Obama's Super PAC--has called it a witch hunt with intimidation as its goal. [Breitbart]




There are indications that even the wacko left are realizing the threat Obama represents.  What will they do about it?  Nada.  If Obama started executing opponents today,  under a pretext of some internal security threat, they'd do nothing.  Until after the election.  Like the accommodation Franz von Papen, Alfred Hugenberg, and several industrialists and businessmen forced on Hindenburg, to make Hitler Chancellor ("We can control him."), Democrats first instincts are focused on keeping the government  in party hands.


Pertinent - Did threats silence media on Obama probe?
Is it true?  Maybe
 Does it comport with how Obama has reacted in the past?  Absolutely



Sunday, October 23, 2011

Mr. Obam's Neighborhood Friends ...........


Beware the U.S. 'day of rage'
a retrospective look



Domestic Terrorists
Obama's announcement for the Illinois Senate in 1996 was held here (rollover), in the home of Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.  During his 2008 campaign he said he barely knew Ayers.  "He's just some guy in the neighborhood."


In 1969 Leftwing domestic terrorist William 'Bill' Ayers, head of the group known as 'the Weathermen,' staged the 'days of rage' in Chicago during which acts of violence, mayhem, and destruction of property were conducted as a means by which Progressive extremists would... so disrupt the country that its economic and social system would crumble and be replaced by a Marxist and pacifistic model.
[...]
Ayers called on the Marxist minions to kill their parents.
[...]

On September 17 of this year yet another 'day of rage' is scheduled to occur in New York City on Wall Street, as once again the militant Marxist Progressives attempt to shut down the stock market and bring to ruin several large firms. ...  And the key players in this year's display of mayhem have a direct connection with those who staged the first event in 1969.

The usual suspects are involved--the union SEIU, former directors of ACORN, and other Leftist organizations that have come to the forefront of attention since the Presidential election of 2008. But as a special report published in 2003  [FULL]

There are inescapable conclusions to be drawn from this.


Tuesday, September 20, 2011

ATTACK WATCH

Maybe The HAMster's Best
The ATTACK WATCH IS WATCHING







Monday, September 19, 2011

So let's impeach the sumbitch

Obama tears up the Constitution
The scope of his lawless disregard expands by the day

Exercise Yard, Raila Odinga Prinson, Kenya.
2013 - Exercise Yard, Raila Odinga Prinson, Kenya.


The Constitution of the United States, whose adoption we celebrate every Sept. 17, clearly lists the powers of each branch of the national government. Let’s take a look at what Barack Obama, like any president, is empowered to do and see if it squares with his actions. In Article II, Section 1, he is sworn to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.” Section 2 names the president as commander in chief of the armed forces, grants him the power to make treaties with the advice and consent of the Senate and to appoint ambassadors, federal judges, Cabinet officials and other federal officers. Section 3 says the president “shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”

In his two years and nine months in office, President Obama has compiled a spectacular record of noncompliance with the Constitution. Here are just some of the ways his administration has failed to execute the laws while using raw, unauthorized power:



Obama could without question be impeached by the House if the political will existed.  It doesn't for a few reasons, not the least of which is the Democrat controlled Senate would never vote to remove him (nor would half the Republicans).  Which is a shame because Obama deserves being removed from office, the sooner the better.

This list presented by the ass-hat left as justification for impeaching Bush  establishes the bar.

Anyway, I will add this article to my Sack of Stuff (Defining Articles) that are kept in the cellar,  for readers who want to reference it in the future.

BTW, Knight does not present a comprehensive list here, but his are fine, and recent additions to others already presented. 

The Reasons