Thursday, April 02, 2009

Coming Of The Him

President Obama flies over Fortress London


First impressions count, and for Obama that was July, 2008, when then candidate putz gave a speech in front of 10 Downing Street while the Prime Minister and family pretended they weren't home.  So much for the Obama who promised to restore the world  respect that "President Bush had squandered."   Brits remain underwhelmed by the Him.
It says a lot about a man, how he makes his big entrance. A motorcade says brute power, as everyone stops to make way for The Leader and an arrival that no one can ignore. But a helicopter out of the night sky? An other-worldly presence coming down out of the starry heavens, bright lights cutting through the darkness as the divine presence comes down to earth?

That is how Barack Obama arrived in London last night, with a deafening chugga-chugga of helicopter engines as he landed by the US Ambassador’s residence in Regent’s Park. This is how the Second Coming will be, if the Lord chooses to make His appearance in a VH-3D helicopter fitted with anti-missile flares.

Only an American president can make such an entrance.


“We were having a discussion before whether it was cool to be seeing Obama, or really sad to be waiting for him,” he (Ad Agency employee "Joe"] said. “I think it has just gone over the boundary from cool to sad.” [Story]
Putz.
Linda Sue ...

No teleprompter machine here

The scripted interview
ChiCom Man-on-the-street interview?
or
Impromptu Obama Q&A?

World Gummint

Sharia Law
Coming to a place near you ...?


Even a broken clock is right twice a day, and it appears that moment happened for KOS.   Proof that the nominated Legal Adviser for the State Department said he "had no problem with Sharia Law," is based on hearsay.  KOS makes the point and prances about with it.

There’s no question about Fox’s agenda here: they are trying to fan the flames of hysterical anger against the Obama administration for their own partisan purposes. -  KOS OUTRAGE

Puh-leeeze.   FOX NEWS gets "due vigilance" points here.  Harold Koh's acknowledged mentor is a proponent of  turning the UN into the World's government.  And, whereas FOX news is consistently rated  the most balanced broadcast news provider [sorry Lefty's but it's twue], KOS is  just a baby step above Moveon.org when it comes to shilling for the left, and never deserves a gloat for landing on "Get Out of Jail."

There is an additional reason to brace against the coming assault on  our judicial system -- the appointment of Anne-Marie Slaughter, the dean of Princeton University's Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, as Director of Policy Planning at State. Her support for an international system dominated by the U.N., and other global institutions and networks is documented by her own hand.  And, of course the SEC/STATE is Her Filthiness. Here's an example of what "other global institutions and networks" allow. What many of us fear is coming.

When the decapitated body of Aasiya Zubair Hassan was found early last month in Orchard Park, N.Y., there was widespread speculation that the gruesome death was an “honor killing” based on Islamic religious or cultural beliefs. The dead woman had recently filed for divorce from her husband, Muzzammil Hassan, whom police promptly arrested and charged with second-degree murder.

It is, of course, ironic that the defendant had founded a Muslim-American television station to help fight Muslim stereotypes and noteworthy that the Muslim community strongly protested suggestions that the murder was either motivated or condoned by Islamic tradition.

But there is good reason to believe so.

At least three similar murders have occurred in the United States over the past year and thousands have been reported worldwide.

As unfathomable as it is to Western minds, “honor killing” occurs frequently. Though largely a vestige of traditional patriarchy and not explicitly approved by Islamic law (Sharia), it remains part of the fundamentalist culture. In that world, a man’s honor consists of two primary components: his reputation, as determined by his own actions in the community, and the chastity or virtue of the female members of his family.  [`Honor Killings’ Rife In Islamic World]


Which is out of place?

Today's Quiz

Yes, Obama is a Neo-Commie

Finally!

Today's Help with that "Secret Shame"


If it's one thing I've learned from the internet, it's that every man will find much needed succor in Dr. Richard Jacob's 8.7 x 4.7 in book, How to Live with a Huge Penis: Advice, Meditations, and Wisdom for Men Who Have Too Much.  Ladies who meet men on the internet can also benefit, with a better understanding of what their pen pals have to live with.

You're welcome.

Polar Bear Scam

The Truth About the Left's Favorite Polar Bear Photo


Next time the media paves the front of every paper with a picture of animals allegedly in distress due to the nonexistent global warming crisis, bear this in mind: - Moonbattery
Is there any group on the left not populated by wretchedly dishonest slugs?  No.   No, there is not. 

Continuing adventures of an arsehole.

What nincompoopery will the teleprompter President come up with next?   How about bowing to the Saudi King?   Watch out President Zero, the Saudi King might cut your apostate Muslim head off.
Putz to the Google Power

Gateway Pundit


What is the only country that doesn't dip its flag in the Olympics?


Although at games held in the US, other countries are still expected to dip their flag in mutual respect, America is the only country refusing to return the gesture. This originated from the 1908 Summer Olympics in London, where countries, as historically done, dipped their flag to the head of state in whose country they were guests: the team was dominated by anti-British Irish-Americans and started the tradition of not showing respect by dipping a flag whilst participating in international games abroad.  We don't bow to Islamo dictators either.

Are we being scripted?

Can we talk?


Remember how excited many of us were over New Hampshire's resolution affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles?  I loved that approach because it was defacto secession, with the onus placed  on the federal gummint for failure to adhere to the constitution.  Alas, a house majority voted to  "Die" rather than "Live Free!"  Anyway, I found the same excitment yesterday, April 1st.  The multitudes, I among them, sprung into full bloom of  manhood over this FreeRepublic post, TEXAS ORDINANCE OF SECESSION(Texas is going for it!) 

Sooo...what does one have to do to become a citizen of Republic of Texas?

Just curious.

5 posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:41:17 PM by madison10


To: madison10; xzins
Sooo...what does one have to do to become a citizen of Republic of Texas?I was born there. So I can be president.
16 posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:46:13 PM by P-Marlowe

I always felt Texas would be the ideal anchor for a United States reformation movement.  First, they are the only state that was once a country, which imputes to them, in my mind, standing the others lack.  Second, it's big.  Several years ago, in response to forerunners of todays Global-warmist freaks, the Population Bomb-ists, I read a book (?) that demonstrated that the entire Earth population could live in Texas, with  living space more generous than Hong Kong. That's important, because a whole lotta people would be moving there.  Third, Texas offers port facilities.  Fourth, With all it's military bases, it's likely that the new Texas nation would possess nuclear weaponry, which by itself would end any Lincolnesqe response by the Obama jingoists, or others with misplaced  patriotism.

Here was an intriguing comment ...

Well, there’s that Nubian in the fuel supply known as Texas vs White to get around first.

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=74&invol=700

To bumper-sticker it, it says that no state has the right to secede once becoming part of the United States.


34 posted on Wednesday, April 01, 2009 11:59:16 PM by decal (Too many people mistake "tolerance" for "approval.")

I read much of it, until I thought of something better to do, like take a leak.  STATE OF TEXAS v. WHITE, 74 U.S. 700 (1868)  concerns  unclaimed United States Texan indemnity bonds, issued January 1, 1851, payable in fourteen years, of the denomination of $1000 each, and coupons attached thereto to the amount of $ 1287.50, amounting in the aggregate, bonds and coupons, to the sum of $156, 287.50.  Said bonds had been used to pay a company for war materials, and evidently the long legal hassle conveys to the United States the right to bar secession, something that did not exist in 1861.

Whether it does, or does not it seems to me a moot point. As Lincoln proved when he used force of arms to nudge the Confederate States back into the Union, "might makes right." The same holds today. Any state seceding must anticipate a war against such of the United States military that chooses to fight against Freedom, which might just consist entirely of Obama's Brown Shirts.  Interesting, and Invigorating thought.


Final thought: The more I think about what's happening, the more I tend to believe that our discontent has been orchestrated.

Wednesday, April 01, 2009

Obama Meets the Queen

OBAMA REGIFTS QUEEN!
Anchor Hocking Glassware - She already had some

Buffalo Wings

Alton Wings
Original Buffalos
I've made several Alton Brown recipes, but never repeated one.  Never got a result worth all the labor most of his deals require.  His chicken wings will be an exception.  Every thing he does with these wings is counter intuitive.
  • Steams wings for 10 minutes,
  • In the fridge for at least an hour. 
  • Bakes them at 425° for 40 minutes - 20 min./side. 
The  wing sauce is true to the original Buffalo Wing's - 3/4 stick of  of butter plus chopped garlic, melted;  add 1/4 cup of hot sauce and toss hot wings.

 The steaming removes enough fat that they won't smoke the house up when baking. The fridge time is for drying the wings, which makes them crispy.  And crispy they are, even after tossing in the sauce.  Mo Sup ate twice as many as me.  Click the pic for the recipe.  Oh - I put the wings on a rack in my fry pan and steamed them in 2 shifts.  The hell with all that other crap. 


Our idiot President

Words Do Not suffice
... except for arsehole, dimwit, schmuck, teabagger, nincompoop, did I say asshole?, jerk-off, berk, wanker, pillock, slubberdegullion druggel, snot-slurper, self-aggrandizing egotistical self-centered commie blowhard of a knob gobbler and pissant scumbag.

Bear Attack

I still think he did it

Astounding Scope


Cincinnati Times Union , July 1937
This is cherry-snipped, but it's obvious where Obama and Senate Democrats are heading.  One vote is all it will take to effectively strike the First Amendment by fiat.  JFC, I can't keep up with the pace of outrages this government is inflicting.   And yet  .....  Go figure
On Mar. 24, the Supreme Court heard arguments in Citizens United v. FEC, the latest installment in an ongoing series of challenges to the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA), better known as McCain-Feingold.

The group Citizens United produced a documentary critical of Hillary Clinton during her failed presidential campaign. (Citizens United also made a similar film about Barack Obama, though this lawsuit focused on the Clinton movie.) But when the group sought to market the movie through Video On Demand, the FEC blocked it. The FEC cited BCRA, which makes it a federal felony to fund any TV or radio broadcast that names a candidate for federal office in the thirty days prior to a primary election or sixty days prior to a general election, called the "blackout" periods.

The Obama Justice Department defended the FEC's action with a team from the department's elite Solicitor General's Office. But that team was outmatched by the lawyer representing Citizens United, renowned former Solicitor General Ted Olson.

Far more important than the specific facts in this case was the enormous scope of power that the Obama Administration was claiming under BCRA, an array so broad that the justices balked at the government's answers to their questions. The Obama Administration claimed that BCRA allows the federal government to ban a 600-page book if it mentions a candidate's name only once, a 90-minute movie if it mentions a candidate's name once, or even a toy action figure of a candidate. If the organization uses a single dime of its general funds to produce, promote or distribute any such materials during the "blackout" periods, it becomes a federal crime.

The key justices in this case seemed astonished at the broad powers the Obama Administration was claiming under BCRA, and seem poised to rule 5-4 in favor of Citizens United. This would continue a steady trend over the past couple years, with moderate Justice Kennedy siding with the four conservative justices on issues of political speech. This will be the third BCRA suit in as many years, and should be decided by the same split as they others.

Erstwhile Liberties

Four Gays Walk Into a Bar ...
and they find a problem.  There's only one stool left.
One guy says "Lets flip for it"
But another says "No, Lets flip it over"
But another says "No, I'm smugglin' jokes up me rectum."
I used to think that Britain's erstwhile colony lagged behind the mother country by about 15 years in the race to socialistic tyranny.  That's been adjusted downward on an ever accelerated pace, and today I've adjusted my SOC-DEFCON  (Socialism Defense Condition) to LEVEL 0. Hell, we might actually be an exporter in some areas. Any bets on how long before one of our commie nincompoops proposes the same legislation? Listen to the Brit government's explanation of why free speech can't apply in this instance.
 ...   ministers said if the “free speech” amendment was accepted it could provide a loophole for people wishing to incite hatred.
And, no, this is sadly not an April Fools joke. 

In The News

TODAY'S NEWS INDEX



The Guardian goes all Twitter, ditching the printed version and the website. “Experts say any story can be told in 140 characters.”

Another early project for Cadie: making a 3D version of Google Chrome, since “81% of households had red/blue 3D glasses lying around.”

There’s no gentle way of putting this, but YouTube just flails with upside down video viewing.

Gmail now has AutoPilot.

Google Brain Search uses CADIE technology to index your brain.

Google Books is in on it too. See this monograph signed by the CADIE team for example.

Google Australia introduces the gBall, which will change Australian rules football as we know it.

There is also a featured YouTube video of a panda by the user ‘cadiesingularity’ with a profile stating “Cadie - the world’s first Cognitive Auto-Heuristic Distributed-Intelligence Entity”.

When browsing Street View in Google Maps, a panda is shown in the bottom right map instead of the yellow person usually shown.

CADIE even has its own blog on Blogger.

There is also a “CADIE’s recommended places for humans” link in Google Maps, which leads to the “Panda Mapplet” and includes several marked locations with “CADIE’s” commentary. Under Redmond WA a link is listed which will rick roll the viewer.

Meanwhile, Identi.ca has acquired Twitter. A Twitter executive was quoted afterwards saying: “I was worried we were going to have to make a business out of that whole Twitter thing! I’m really glad it’s someone else’s problem now.”

Google is apparently also building a new $100 laptop together with Alienware (Dell). It will have a built-in brain wave reading chip, with sensors that need to be applied onto the user’s skull.

Scientists at CERN have found the cell that basically triggered the Big Bang.

The Pirate Bay sells out to Warner Bros.

There’s a new social network for your nose, a friendspace for your fragrance, a place to share your opinions on perfumes and vote for your favorite smells. They call it smellr and it’s online now.

Grandson of Kenyan Mau-Mau, now an Indonesian Muslim elected U.S. President.

Mostly purloined

Daily flossing, maybe ...

Wedgie-cide?

A splendid idea



Samarui A.G. TFV found this wonderfully  refreshing answer to all our problems. 
The Prez has flown to England and there’s only one thing to do while he’s gone: Let’s get our country back. Okay, it’s not going to be easy, there are a lot of hurdles.  I’m pretty sure I can take Harry Reid, Chris Dodd, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, and that puffball press secretary Gibbs.  Multiple adversary bash-a-thon!!!   Hai-Yah!!

Barney Frank I ain’t touchin’… I’m not a homophobe; I simply suffer from an irrational childhood fear of Elmer Fudd.

And Nancy Pelosi?  I’m sending my friend Andrew Breitbart in to cross-check her hard into the glass.  (I know he’s been dyin’ to get the go-ahead.)  I am certain that if I confronted her, she would hit me with that death ray from those Neutronium eyeballs of hers…the same ones that hypnotize the Washington press corps into not busting up every time she opens her mouth.

But seriously, folks.  I don’t know why anyone’s surprised.  Obama for two years told us what he’s all about.  Made it clear as day.  And everyone just sort of…looked the other way. ”Oh, he’s not a socialist!  He’s just saying those things to keep the far left loonies happy.  You watch, he’ll govern from the center.”

Oh really?  Well, it’s been only two months and let’s take a look at what he’s done.  (Everybody follow along, and please feel free to add anything I’m missing.) -- Continued

Pounce

Faces of Evil Incompetence
Dodd/Blumenthal
Barney Frank

If you haven't yet seen Glenn Beck's confrontation with Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal , it's a priceless example of a democrat being asked, probably for the very first time, to explain his feckless administration of the law for political gain.  To wit: why he hasn't gone after Chris Dodd with the same vigor as AIG bonus recipients, who broke no laws?
Beck evaluates Barney Frank as a public servant, which he has been since 1972.
Chilling words: "The government is now 80% owner."


FWIW, Beck has a Kieth Olbermann-ish style of delivery that I find unsettling.  I guess I miss Brit Hume's sober and dignified delivery.

DIY Car Window

Why We Win
Don't need no stinkin' $400 replacement

Tuesday, March 31, 2009

UN ABUSE

UN Abuse
ckick-click


Given the current situation -- Obama nationalizing American business, funding ACORN, his own personal terror group to the tune of $5B,  Obama 's top legal nominee Koh has "No Problem With Sharia Law," blah-blah-blah, given all that, it should come as no surprise if Obama brings in the UN, under some guise, as a hedge against U.S. military commanders backing the wrong side when the time comes.  But, Linda Sue did send some good news.  A video of what the UN-mandated KFOR peacekeepers in Bosnia do with their time -- jerk-off, if this French soldier is any indication. Ought to be a piece of cake, they.

Remember, I did say "jerk-off," and that would be in the biblical sense, so click at the risk of your immortal soul.
Here's the link for direct WMV viewing.   Here's the original video with Kosavocky talk and sniggering..