Thursday, February 05, 2009

Stuff

Yes, I'm talking to f**kn you.


Because f**kn NSA is waiting for me to  f**kn reveal my plans to disintegrate Capitol f**kn Hill with my Deathray 9000, I'll open with these f**kn cookie cutter outakes  from Hardon Crab PS. None of them are funny with the possible exception of the Tom Marr/ Earl Weaver parody of themselves. If only it would have accidentally aired. The rest are Liberal Ass**les being Ass**les. I don't know why the f**kn f**k I even bothered.
Flashback to some quick funnies. Language is VERY strong on some of them so you have been forewarned.....
 
Col. Sanders and KFC 
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1c7k2zyLn6I&feature=related
 
Casey Kasem's American To 40
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDYK2H0ldbo&NR=1
 
Earl Weaver of your BALTIMORE ORIOLES!!!!!!
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QWQbN0jFo_k
 
Barry White (click on the speaker partway down page)
 
http://macksimpson.com/adverb/2006/05/12/white-gets-dark/
 
Chris Berman
 
http://youtube.com/watch?v=3TLG_LtWhj4
 
 
And a brand new one:
 
Christian Bale (makes me want to think twice about seeing another Batman with him in it):
 
http://youtube.com/watch?v=qrvMTv_r8sA
 
Warning: Listening to these mother f**kers is like 8 weeks of boot camp. Be careful when asking your mother to pass the gravy.

Wednesday, February 04, 2009

Shoulder CHAIRS!

Retired Guys Drill Team
Recommended by Jodi's dad.

The eyes have it

Dumbest Speaker, ever

"Dumber than Soap"
'500 MILLION AMERICANS LOSE JOBS EVERY MONTH' - Pelosi


I think she's was thinking about the number of children who went hungry during the Bush Administration.  Or people without health care.  Or, trees cut daily in the rain forest.  But that, jobs lost?  That just don't make sense.

Train your squirrel for fun and profit

NSA

The Spy Factory
NOVA
I watched NOVA's The Spy Factory last night, after the Terps narrow loss to North Carolina-Chapel Hill.  You can watch the 50 minute program on-line, all at once, or in segments.  I promise you won't turn it off, or want to, anyway.  I can't say I was astounded by any one detail, having already been immersed in the subject, but there were plenty of interesting new details presented.  What did astound me, was that not once was the name "Jamie Gorelick," uttered, even though her handiwork was much in evidence throughout.  Sort of like discussing the 1986 World Series without mentioning Bill Buckner.  But then, this is PBS. Watch anyway. 

Obamacare and Daschle

What a relief
The Magic Negro's Plan X From Outer Space



WALLACE: And it -- it becomes clear from your answer that you played a role in the decision for him to...

OBAMA: No. No, no, no, no, no. I don't want to -- I don't want to mistake the issue here. Tom made the decision here. He called me and indicated this was his decision.

I don't want to mistake the issue?  WTF does that mean?  Oh.  No teleprompter.  Sorry. Anyway, Chris Wallace is talking to Obama about the third tax cheat he tried to appoint to his cabinet, Tom Daschle.  Here's the really good part.
Ultimately, I have to take responsibility for a process that resulted in us not having a HHS secretary at a time when people need relief from their health-care costs.
And how does the Magic Negro think gummint can grant Health Care relief?  And how in hell was a political hack like Tom Daschle going to help?  This is an opportune time to snippet George Will's column yesterday, Congress Will Have the Buffet

President Lyndon Johnson, to make the deficit numbers during the Vietnam War less scary, adopted the "unified budget," under which Social Security's surplus was mingled with general revenue, thereby reducing -- disguising, really -- the deficit's size. That, Cooper says, was the "original sin" in the budgeting sleight of hand that prevents the public from knowing, and Congress from being compelled to act on, facts about the entitlement programs' unfunded liabilities -- promises to future beneficiaries that future taxpayers may not be willing to keep.

...  the 188-page 2008 Financial Report of the United States Government -- the only government document that calculates what deficit and debt numbers would be if the government practiced, as businesses must, accrual accounting.

Under such accounting, future outlays to which beneficiaries are entitled by existing law are acknowledged as expenditures before they are paid. Were the Social Security surplus sequestered for accounting purposes, reflecting the truth that it is already obligated, and were there similar treatment of the other entitlement programs' liabilities, the deficit for the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30 would have been $3 trillion rather than $454.8 billion. The report's numbers show that the true national debt is $56 trillion, not the widely reported $10 trillion.

The report says that in 25 years the portion of the population 65 and older will increase from 12 percent to 20 percent, while the share of the population that is working and paying taxes will decrease from 60 percent to 55 percent. If Medicare spending continues to grow, as it has for four decades, more than 1 1/2 times as fast as the economy, the big three entitlements, which currently are 44 percent of all federal expenditures (excluding interest costs of the national debt), will be 65 percent by 2030. Under current law, 30 years from now government revenue will cover only half of anticipated expenditures.

Liberalism's signature achievement -- the welfare state's entitlement buffet -- will, unless radically reduced, starve government of resources needed for everything on liberalism's agenda for people not elderly.
Among Obama's Health Care plan is a proposal to establish an advisory board, which mission must include, of necessity, denying  treatment to coffer-draining elderly, and anyone else who can't return to the tax rolls.  Sort of like decisions the SS made at the entrance to Auschwitz.    You can kiss new medical and pharmaceutical breakthroughs goodbye as well.  That's how you'll spell R-E-L-E-I-F.

Blow Me

Self Entitlement In a Tu Tu


Psycho gaywad activists took pro Proposition 8 contributions data, and are publishing  a mash-up of Google Maps and Prop 8 Donors. 

For what purpose?   Andrew Sullivan, a professional Gay, says:

The second anyone does anything inappropriate with this information Dreher has a right to complain. Until then, it's public information. And Prop 8 donors and anti-Prop 8 donors knew that before they donated.

Andy didn't contribute to either side, (unless his real job is  Product Manager for MCAFEE INC.) so we can't show you how to find him, alas.

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

He's not Albanian ..

Where the Flubber Hirs the Road

Going, Going ...


Marsha was able to make this great leap in faith.  It was obvious to her, obviously, that oil sheiks, like those who drive a silver Mercedes,  would pounce on the opportunity to  marry her, and wallow in her certifiably ample flesh forever, and ever.  Lookers need not apply. Better hurry to the Dubai Craig's List, because she won't be on the market much longer.  I know I'm filled with lust.  Tim Walker too.

PS - I wonder if it would be okay to contact her about a commercial venture?

That's Nice Dear, Mommy's Reading

It was prolly political harassment anyway

DAS BOOT


I don't think anyone here would do this, but if someone else finds themselves Denver Booted, they may want to bitchslap gummint  for messing everything up, and just take it off.  Here's one way, according to a guy who did it.
Removing the boot without tools or damage is actually a very simple matter. Simply let out about half of the air from the "booted" tired. Once you let the air out the prong that holds the boot in place can be slid past the tire, exposing the hubcap. I had initially intended to change the tire but I found that after sliding the clamp off the front of the tire the rest of the boot was only hooked into the wheel from the rear. I got behind the wheel of the car, started it and drove it a few inches forward and the torque of the wheel immediately popped the boot completely off. How to Remove a Parking Boot 

When Something Wicked This Way Comes

Camp Hastings
The showers are open
I've done some searching on impeached federal judge, now Rep. Alcee Hasting's (D FL) National Emergency Centers Establishment Act ( HR  645) , and here's what I found.  Hastings has no cosponsors yet for this law which would, among other things, mandate the building of at least one camp in each FEMA district, to be used as "FEMA feels necessary."  So far, it only serves as validation for  fears that our gummint sees a need for detainment camps.  Since Obama happens to be president now, the Grathwohl video fits in.  Despite his protestations to the contrary, there is no person Obama had more association with during his Chicago years than William Ayers.  FEMA is a bad president's nuggie stick.   Bad people need to be watched rigorously, and there are very bad people. 

RBO has some level headed treatment of 645.
WHAT FEMA CAN DO NOW
Larry Grathwohl was recruited into the Weather Underground by Bill Ayers ...





Yes, it's safe for work

I dunno.  Just doesn't seem proper.

Way TMI

Loving Peter
Real Stories About Peter


For the past 7-8 years MoSup has regaled me with Peter and Jane stories, as related by coworker and mother "Mrs. X."  Peter is now 10,  and sister Jane is 11.  I could write a book on them. From this morning.
The family was busy getting ready for the Superbowl party when Peter announced that he had "hairs on his pee-pee."  That stopped all conversation, so Peter continued, "If you think that's something, you should see what comes out of it in the morning."  Sister Jane replied,  "That's way TMI Peter."

Onama's CHEKA




Holder also said that he would look askance at efforts to "criminalize policy differences" but did not conclusively rule out prosecution of Bush administration officials for their involvement in detainee questioning and warrantless surveillance operations.
As chief political police (Cheka) enforcer, Eric Holder will function as Obama's "Felix Dzerzhinsky" - the backbone of of his new regime.

Monday, February 02, 2009

War Drums

Your worst nightmare ....
You're at home making popcorn for the Cub Scout meeting when you hear trucks pulling up your driveway.  California  plates.  When  Maxine Waters jumps off the deuce-and-a-half, sporting a chicken bone through her nose, and carrying a machete, you realize your worst nightmare is upon you. All 34 US House of Representative Democrats from CA are here to take you out!

 Yes, you're a crack shot, but as you pull  your 1911 ACP from it's custom RAK crafted holster,.you know that even with the two clips you have at the ready, you'll only be able to take out 15 of them before they swarm you  Here they come .  Pow pow pow.  Matui, Woolsey and Waters. Pow pow pow pow pow.   McNerney, Stark, Honda and Lofgren down.  New clip!  Pow pow pow pow. Costa, Capps Sherman and Sanchez.  Arghhhhh! Pow pow pow click!  Davis, Filner, Baca and ... no!  Out of ammo. 

Waxman and Schiff are beating you with iron frying pans, and pushing knitting needles into your eye sockets.  The kids are crying as things turn black, Waxman's spittle dripping onto your face.  If only ..... 
... if only you had 40 round drum magazine for your Colt, you'd still be alive, and Democrats would no longer control the House of Representatives.  The Rangel Rule would become law.  



I can't have that Pocket Model 45, but I can have this ... if it was in stock.  Anyone have any experience with this beauty?  Will my barrel melt after firing 41 rounds in 10 seconds?

New Hampshire's HCR 6

Smartest Thing The Past Half-Century


Tailgunner Dick linked to this, and wow.  I have read no review, article, or critique of this New Hampshire HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION 6, affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.   I have read it, every word, and felt a surge of positive emotion run through me such as I haven't felt for at least 25 years.  I will move to any state that adopts this common sense resolution as foundation law, and defend it with my life.  And I'll whistle while I work.

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Nine

A RESOLUTION affirming States’ rights based on Jeffersonian principles.

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 1, Article 7 declares that the people of this State have the sole and exclusive right of governing themselves as a free, sovereign, and independent State; and do, and forever hereafter shall, exercise and enjoy every power, jurisdiction, and right, pertaining thereto, which is not, or may not hereafter be, by them expressly delegated to the United States of America in congress assembled; and

Whereas the Constitution of the State of New Hampshire, Part 2, Article 1 declares that the people inhabiting the territory formerly called the province of New Hampshire, do hereby solemnly and mutually agree with each other, to form themselves into a free, sovereign and independent body-politic, or State, by the name of The State of New Hampshire; and

Whereas the State of New Hampshire when ratifying the Constitution for the United States of America recommended as a change, “First That it be Explicitly declared that all Powers not expressly & particularly Delegated by the aforesaid are reserved to the several States to be, by them Exercised;” and

Whereas the other States that included recommendations, to wit Massachusetts, New York, North Carolina, Rhode Island and Virginia, included an identical or similar recommended change; and

Whereas these recommended changes were incorporated as the ninth amendment, the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people, and the tenth amendment, the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people, to the Constitution for the United States of America; now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the House of Representatives, the Senate concurring:

That the several States composing the United States of America, are not united on the principle of unlimited submission to their General Government; but that, by a compact under the style and title of a Constitution for the United States, and of amendments thereto, they constituted a General Government for special purposes, -- delegated to that government certain definite powers, reserving, each State to itself, the residuary mass of right to their own self-government; and that whensoever the General Government assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force; that to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party: that the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among powers having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions as of the mode and measure of redress; and

7 That the Constitution of the United States, having delegated to Congress a power to punish treason, counterfeiting the securities and current coin of the United States, piracies, and felonies committed on the high seas, and offences against the law of nations, slavery, and no other crimes whatsoever; and it being true as a general principle, and one of the amendments to the Constitution having also declared, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people,” therefore all acts of Congress which assume to create, define, or punish crimes, other than those so enumerated in the Constitution are altogether void, and of no force; and that the power to create, define, and punish such other crimes is reserved, and, of right, appertains solely and exclusively to the respective States, each within its own territory; and

That it is true as a general principle, and is also expressly declared by one of the amendments to the Constitution, that “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people;” and that no power over the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, or freedom of the press being delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, all lawful powers respecting the same did of right remain, and were reserved to the States or the people: that thus was manifested their determination to retain to themselves the right of judging how far the licentiousness of speech and of the press may be abridged without lessening their useful freedom, and how far those abuses which cannot be separated from their use should be tolerated, rather than the use be destroyed. And thus also they guarded against all abridgment by the United States of the freedom of religious opinions and exercises, and retained to themselves the right of protecting the same. And that in addition to this general principle and express declaration, another and more special provision has been made by one of the amendments to the Constitution, which expressly declares, that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press:” thereby guarding in the same sentence, and under the same words, the freedom of religion, of speech, and of the press: insomuch, that whatever violated either, throws down the sanctuary which covers the others, and that libels, falsehood, and defamation, equally with heresy and false religion, are withheld from the cognizance of federal tribunals. That, therefore, all acts of Congress of the United States which do abridge the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, are not law, but are altogether void, and of no force; and

That the construction applied by the General Government (as is evidenced by sundry of their proceedings) to those parts of the Constitution of the United States which delegate to Congress a power “to lay and collect taxes, duties, imports, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States,” and “to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested by the Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof,” goes to the destruction of all limits prescribed to their power by the Constitution: that words meant by the instrument to be subsidiary only to the execution of limited powers, ought not to be so construed as themselves to give unlimited powers, nor a part to be so taken as to destroy the whole residue of that instrument: that the proceedings of the General Government under color of these articles, will be a fit and necessary subject of revisal and correction; and

7That a committee of conference and correspondence be appointed, which shall have as its charge to communicate the preceding resolutions to the Legislatures of the several States; to assure them that this State continues in the same esteem of their friendship and union which it has manifested from that moment at which a common danger first suggested a common union: that it considers union, for specified national purposes, and particularly to those specified in their federal compact, to be friendly to the peace, happiness and prosperity of all the States: that faithful to that compact, according to the plain intent and meaning in which it was understood and acceded to by the several parties, it is sincerely anxious for its preservation: that it does also believe, that to take from the States all the powers of self-government and transfer them to a general and consolidated government, without regard to the special delegations and reservations solemnly agreed to in that compact, is not for the peace, happiness or prosperity of these States; and that therefore this State is determined, as it doubts not its co-States are, to submit to undelegated, and consequently unlimited powers in no man, or body of men on earth: that in cases of an abuse of the delegated powers, the members of the General Government, being chosen by the people, a change by the people would be the constitutional remedy; but, where powers are assumed which have not been delegated, a nullification of the act is the rightful remedy: that every State has a natural right in cases not within the compact, (casus non foederis), to nullify of their own authority all assumptions of power by others within their limits: that without this right, they would be under the dominion, absolute and unlimited, of whosoever might exercise this right of judgment for them: that nevertheless, this State, from motives of regard and respect for its co-States, has wished to communicate with them on the subject: that with them alone it is proper to communicate, they alone being parties to the compact, and solely authorized to judge in the last resort of the powers exercised under it, Congress being not a party, but merely the creature of the compact, and subject as to its assumptions of power to the final judgment of those by whom, and for whose use itself and its powers were all created and modified: that if the acts before specified should stand, these conclusions would flow from them: that it would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights: that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism -- free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence; it is jealousy and not confidence which prescribes limited constitutions, to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power: that our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no further, our confidence may go. In questions of power, then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. That this State does therefore call on its co-States for an expression of their sentiments on acts not authorized by the federal compact. And it doubts not that their sense will be so announced as to prove their attachment unaltered to limited government, whether general or particular. And that the rights and liberties of their co-States will be exposed to no dangers by remaining embarked in a common bottom with their own. That they will concur with this State in considering acts as so palpably against the Constitution as to amount to an undisguised declaration that that compact is not meant to be the measure of the powers of the General Government, but that it will proceed in the exercise over these States, of all powers whatsoever: that they will view this as seizing the rights of the States, and consolidating them in the hands of the General Government, with a power assumed to bind the States, not merely as the cases made federal, (casus foederis,) but in all cases whatsoever, by laws made, not with their consent, but by others against their consent: that this would be to surrender the form of government we have chosen, and live under one deriving its powers from its own will, and not from our authority; and that the co-States, recurring to their natural right in cases not made federal, will concur in declaring these acts void, and of no force, and will each take measures of its own for providing that neither these acts, nor any others of the General Government not plainly and intentionally authorized by the Constitution, shall be exercised within their respective territories; and

That the said committee be authorized to communicate by writing or personal conferences, at any times or places whatever, with any person or person who may be appointed by any one or more co-States to correspond or confer with them; and that they lay their proceedings before the next session of the General Court; and

FThat any Act by the Congress of the United States, Executive Order of the President of the United States of America or Judicial Order by the Judicatories of the United States of America which assumes a power not delegated to the government of United States of America by the Constitution for the United States of America and which serves to diminish the liberty of the any of the several States or their citizens shall constitute a nullification of the Constitution for the United States of America by the government of the United States of America. Acts which would cause such a nullification include, but are not limited to:

I. Establishing martial law or a state of emergency within one of the States comprising the United States of America without the consent of the legislature of that State.

II. Requiring involuntary servitude, or governmental service other than a draft during a declared war, or pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

III. Requiring involuntary servitude or governmental service of persons under the age of 18 other than pursuant to, or as an alternative to, incarceration after due process of law.

IV. Surrendering any power delegated or not delegated to any corporation or foreign government.

V. Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press.

VI. Further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition; and

That should any such act of Congress become law or Executive Order or Judicial Order be put into force, all powers previously delegated to the United States of America by the Constitution for the United States shall revert to the several States individually. Any future government of the United States of America shall require ratification of three quarters of the States seeking to form a government of the United States of America and shall not be binding upon any State not seeking to form such a government; and

That copies of this resolution be transmitted by the house clerk to the President of the United States, each member of the United States Congress, and the presiding officers of each State’s legislature.


The Rangel Rule

The angle of your rangel ...


Wednesday, January 28, 2009


The "Rangel Rule"   [Ramesh Ponnuru]

Rep. John Carter, a Texas Republican, sent out a press release earlier today about his innovative new bill:

"Rangel Rule"

All U.S. taxpayers would enjoy the same immunity from IRS penalties and interest as House Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel (D-NY) and Obama Administration Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, if a bill introduced today by Congressman John Carter (R-TX) becomes law.

Carter, a former longtime Texas judge, today introduced the Rangel Rule Act of 2009, HR 735, which would prohibit the Internal Revenue Service from charging penalties and interest on back taxes against U.S. citizens. Under the proposed law, any taxpayer who wrote “Rangel Rule” on their return when paying back taxes would be immune from penalties and interest.

Thanks to Casca for the heads up

More pre-impeachment stuff

Wow ... the Times does some actual reporting ...


Obama appointed more than 17 lobbyists after talking big on anti-lobbyist, clean Governance
It is easy to project yourself as a clean politician after making your debut in South Side Chicago with buddies like Rahm Emanuel. US president Obama has appointed more than 17 lobbyists after talking big on anti-lobbyist Governance and rooting corruption out of the American Government.

Dreams are dreams. Facts are facts. President Obama is surrounded by corrupt lobbyists ready to sell America cheap. One good silver lining – if Obama Adminsitration’s corruption index is 10, Bush Administration’s was 95.

Take the example of the newest exposure of doubletalk from Obama! After calling for clean Governance, he appoints a Treasury Secretary who “forgot” to pay for his ‘business tax’ for years! Tom Daschle, a top lobbyist in Washington, who has amended his U.S. tax forms to pay back taxes with interest, is now Obama’s best choice for America’s chief health official.

Daschle, 61, paid more than $140,000 in back taxes and interest on Jan. 2, the New York Times reported, citing unidentified administration officials. The back taxes involved unreported consulting fees, questionable charitable contributions and a car and driver provided by Democratic Party donor Leo Hindery Jr., a founder of the private equity firm InterMedia Advisors, according to a confidential draft report prepared by the Senate Finance Committee, the Washington Post reported.

No wonder Obama does not want to prosecute the Bush Administration for their wrong doings! No wonder Obama spent 170 million dollars in inauguration extravaganza when common American families were facing loss of jobs, lack of healthcare, and foreclosures!

Would you believe, Obama had to issue 17 waivers on his own rule in less than two weeks for allowing lobbyist enter his Administration and control Governance of America!
uh ... that's the Times of INDIA

Timmy Himmlers dad

irs nazis

Amazing Stuff

Weird Science



Have you ever noticed that if you rearrange the letters in "illegal immigrants" and add a few more letters, it actually spells out:

"Fu*k off and go home all you benefit stealing, kid producing, non English-speaking coc*suckers, and take those hairy-faced, sandal wearing, bomb making, goat fu*king, mutton eating, smelly raghead bastards with you. And that includes you Obama."

How weird is that ??
Tim W

End Times

4 things I didn't know but thought I did
Over the past few days I've been showered by -- epiphanies is too strong a word -- surprising revelations.  All came from areas that I pay more than casual attention too. and all the information was available beforehand, but none of it reported by popular western media.  I'll offer as a corollary to my position, Obama voters.  People who think they know what's happening, because they listen to the popular media reports.  Here they are for your entertainment, and possible education.

#4 - Final Fatima prediction.  This is how the  message was delivered to most of us in the Americas, in 2000.
Some believed the third, unrevealed secret was a doomsday prophecy foretelling the end of the world.

But a top Vatican cardinal said otherwise on Saturday as the pope visited Fatima to beatify the two shepherd children from the story. Cardinal Angelo Sodano said the "interpretations" of the children spoke of a "bishop clothed in white" who, while making his way amid the corpses of martyrs, "falls to the ground, apparently dead, under a burst of gunfire."

The description recalled the 1981 assassination attempt against John Paul, who was wounded when a Turkish gunmen opened fire in St. Peter's Square. The shooting came on May 13 -- the same day as the first of the reported Fatima visions in 1917.

Sodano recalled that John Paul has credited the Virgin of Fatima with intervening and saving his life. He quoted the pope as saying a "motherly hand" guided the bullet's path, enabling the "dying pope" to halt "at the threshold of death."

Here's a truth just a tad different.



Next - The Shroud of Turin (after I take care of the IRS Nazis,  and find out why the electricity went out in two upstairs rooms.

I hear Zulu chants

How Con-ven-ient, this  market collapse
seeded with socialist intervention


Time for a new world order: PM

 
[Australian PM] KEVIN RUDD has denounced the unfettered capitalism of the past three decades and called for a new era of "social capitalism" in which government intervention and regulation feature heavily.

"Neo-liberalism and the free-market fundamentalism it has produced has been revealed as little more than personal greed dressed up as an economic philosophy. And, ironically, it now falls to social democracy to prevent liberal capitalism from cannibalising itself."

Mr Rudd writes in The Monthly that just as Franklin Roosevelt rebuilt US capitalism after the Great Depression, modern-day "social democrats" such as himself and the US President, Barack Obama, must do the same again. But he argues that "minor tweakings of long-established orthodoxies will not do" and advocates a new system that reaches beyond the 70-year-old interventionist principles of John Maynard Keynes.

"A system of open markets, unambiguously regulated by an activist state, and one in which the state intervenes to reduce the greater inequalities that competitive markets will inevitably generate," he writes.
Tadamichi Kuribayashi   faced much the same problem.  But, we're not quite that besieged.  Yet.

Sunday, February 01, 2009

Super Bowl Thug

Exciting game, but ...
James Harrison, the Steeler who accounted for the margin of victory with his stunning 100 yard interception return, is also the winner of the Nancy Pelosi Award, given to the biggest piece of human crap in any event.  A thug, pure and simple, who ought to have been ejected from the game. 

Liquiidation Special

A modest proposal
DIY


California has failed to repay taxpayers for excessive tax withholding, so here's what should happen.  I know, I know, you're way ahead of me with "How does the state treat me when I can't pay my tax?" formula. Send them a bill for a $500 fine, and monthly interest compounded at 18%.   And don't argue that by charging the state, you're just charging yourself.  That's crap.  You have no more influence over the state than I do, and I don't live there.  How many times in the past ten years have voters passed an initiative only to have some pissant judge throw it out?  'Exactly.  You're serfs.

Anyway, sending them a bill is useless.  Useless because, what do crooks do when they can't pay the rent?  That's right,  they mug people.  Fixing to do that now, count on it.   Why not turn the next page from the tax man's book, and seize state proppity.  Auction it off.  The Governor's mansion, state house, parks, office buildings. Sell it all off, and pay yourselves what's owed.  I'm not kidding.  State gummint will become a lot less intrusive when they have to assemble in a Motel 6  meeting room, without pay.  It's the recipe for great gummint, actually.

You're welcome.


1-31-07

Intrepid Bostonians
Gekded Celt

Beautiful Things

Gun Pr0n


There are things that are so esthetically pleasing to me, that I must have one.  Without fail, however, the cost is always prohibitive, either monetarily, or socially.  Like this Cylinder & Slide M2008 Historical Pocket Model 45 ACP, at $2,995. In fact I prefer it over the C&S $8000 custom build that's featured here.  If I did get my hands on one though, it would create a problem for me.  I would never use it defensively for fear the cops would confiscate it as evidence in my justifiable homicide trial.  Even found innocent, I'd never get it back. It would go missing from the evidence room.  Pricks.

Only in Detroit

Judge Gives 7-Year-Old Right To Decide 


Only in Detroit
Detroit MI (AP) - A seven-year old boy was at the center of a Wayne County courtroom drama yesterday when he challenged a court ruling over who should have custody of him.   The boy has a history of being beaten by his parents and the judge initially awarded custody to his aunt, in keeping with child custody law and regulation requiring that family unity be maintained to the highest degree possible. The boy surprised the court when he proclaimed that his aunt beat him more than his parents and he adamantly refused to live with her.  When the judge then suggested that he live with his grandparents, the  boy cried and said that they also beat him. After considering the remainder of the immediate family and learning that domestic violence was apparently a way of life among them, the judge took the unprecedented step of allowing the boy to propose who should have custody of him.

After two recesses to check legal references and confer with the child welfare officials, the judge granted temporary custody to the Detroit Lions, whom the boy firmly believes are not capable of beating anyone.
Grinning Celt

MOCKBA COPS

The Week's Best Two Crack Москва Cop Pics
Blouses Up & Primed for Action

Pedo the Bear

The Week's Best Two Education Pics
Pedo the Bear and  Science Fair

Ice Rink and Ice Slip

The Week's Best Two Winter Sports Pics
Ice Clean and Ice Slip

Bear-Wolf and Brown Sugar

The Week's Best Two Animal Cathartics
Bear/Wolf and Brown Sugar


What men do at church

Mass, he stares at ya

Miss Poopy Pants

Keepin' the flies off the watermelon

Tim W

Brits realize they F***'d up

The British called - They want their guns back!
Need I say more?
Merrily

Friday, January 30, 2009

What Fart?

One More Example of American Ingenuity
When Democrats don't interfere
CR

Meet the Stupids



Government spending, deficits, and debt creation of this magnitude is simply unheard of. So the added TARP money will surely imperil the entire stimulus package as taxpayers around the country begin to digest the enormity of these proposed government actions. Financing of this type would not only destroy the U.S. fiscal position for years to come, it could destroy the dollar in the process. What's more, the likelihood of massive tax increases -- which at some point will become front and center in this gargantuan funding operation -- would doom the economy for decades. - Larry Kudlow
Thank the 177 Republicans (100%),  and 11 democrats who voted against this monstrosity.  Whether you believe this entire affair was orchestrated by the likes of Soros and friends (I do), or that democrats are just piss poor money managers (I do), this has to be stopped.  But Rodge, what should we do?  I'll tell you what to do.  Go back to what made us a great nation.  Encourage the creation of new manufacturing and business ventures.
  1. Eliminate all Cap Gains taxes now.
  2. Eliminate all environmental business mandates.
  3. Drill for oil like a madman.
  4. Eliminate all possible restrictions aimed at capital creation (new businesses).
  5. Curtail tort lawyers stranglehold on business.
  6. Cut government services to the bone.
  7. Eliminate the IRS in favor of the 17% flat tax.
In less than two years we'll be the only nation in the world growing like gangbusters.
Because this is who we are, when gummint doesn't get in the way.



Fault Jumping

I think this'll work
Fault Jumping